IS NULL vs equals NULL in SQL - Performance Comparison
We want to understand how checking for NULL values in SQL affects the time it takes to run a query.
Specifically, we ask: Does using IS NULL or = NULL change how long the query takes as data grows?
Analyze the time complexity of these two queries:
-- Using IS NULL
SELECT * FROM employees WHERE manager_id IS NULL;
-- Using equals NULL
SELECT * FROM employees WHERE manager_id = NULL;
Both queries try to find rows where manager_id is missing, but use different syntax.
Look at what repeats as the database checks each row:
- Primary operation: Checking the
manager_idvalue for each row. - How many times: Once per row in the
employeestable.
As the number of rows grows, the database must check more values:
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | 10 checks |
| 100 | 100 checks |
| 1000 | 1000 checks |
Pattern observation: The number of checks grows directly with the number of rows.
Time Complexity: O(n)
This means the time to run the query grows in a straight line as the table gets bigger.
[X] Wrong: "Using = NULL works the same as IS NULL and returns the right rows."
[OK] Correct: In SQL, = NULL never matches any row because NULL means unknown, so this condition always fails. Only IS NULL correctly finds rows with missing values.
Understanding how NULL checks work and their cost helps you write correct and efficient queries, a skill valued in real projects and interviews.
"What if we add an index on manager_id? How would that change the time complexity of the IS NULL query?"
Practice
age has missing (NULL) values?Solution
Step 1: Understand NULL in SQL
NULL means unknown or missing data, and it cannot be compared with = or != operators.Step 2: Use IS NULL to check for missing values
The correct way to check for NULL is usingIS NULL, which returns true for missing values.Final Answer:
age IS NULL-> Option AQuick Check:
Use IS NULL to check missing values [OK]
- Using = NULL returns no rows
- Confusing IS NULL with equality operator
- Using == NULL which is invalid in SQL
salary is NULL?Solution
Step 1: Review SQL syntax for NULL checks
SQL usesIS NULLto check for NULL values; equality operators (=, ==) are invalid here.Step 2: Identify the correct syntax
OnlyWHERE salary IS NULLis valid and will run without error.Final Answer:
WHERE salary IS NULL -> Option AQuick Check:
IS NULL is correct syntax for NULL checks [OK]
- Using = NULL causes syntax errors or no matches
- Using == NULL is invalid SQL
- Using != NULL does not find NULLs
employees with column manager_id that can be NULL, what will this query return?SELECT * FROM employees WHERE manager_id = NULL;
Solution
Step 1: Understand comparison with NULL using = operator
In SQL,= NULLdoes not match any rows because NULL is unknown and cannot be compared with =.Step 2: Result of the query
The query returns zero rows because no value equals NULL using = operator.Final Answer:
No rows -> Option CQuick Check:
= NULL returns no rows [OK]
- Expecting = NULL to find NULL values
- Confusing NULL with empty string or zero
- Assuming syntax error instead of empty result
email:SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = NULL;
But it returns no rows. What is the fix?
Solution
Step 1: Identify incorrect NULL comparison
Using= NULLdoes not find NULL values because NULL is not equal to anything.Step 2: Correct NULL check syntax
UseIS NULLto properly find rows whereemailis missing.Final Answer:
Change to email IS NULL -> Option DQuick Check:
Use IS NULL to find missing values [OK]
- Using != NULL expecting to find NULLs
- Using string 'NULL' instead of NULL keyword
- Using IS NOT NULL which finds non-missing values
SELECT * FROM customers WHERE ???
Solution
Step 1: Understand NULL and empty string difference
NULL means missing data, empty string means data is present but empty.Step 2: Combine conditions correctly
Usephone IS NULLto find missing phone numbers andphone = ''to find empty strings, combined with OR to get either case.Final Answer:
phone IS NULL OR phone = '' -> Option BQuick Check:
Use IS NULL for missing, = '' for empty [OK]
- Using = NULL which never matches
- Using AND instead of OR excludes all rows
- Confusing empty string with NULL
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
