Bird
Raised Fist0
Postmantesting~10 mins

Default and conditional responses in Postman - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to set a default response status code in Postman test script.

Postman
pm.test('Status code is 200', function () { pm.response.to.have.status([1]); });
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A201
B404
C500
D200
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 404 or 500 as default success status codes.
Confusing 201 (Created) with 200 (OK).
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to check if the response body contains the word 'success'.

Postman
pm.test('Body contains success', function () { pm.expect(pm.response.text()).to.include([1]); });
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A'error'
B'success'
C'fail'
D'warning'
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using incorrect strings like 'error' or 'fail'.
Forgetting to include quotes around the string.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the conditional test to check if status code is 404.

Postman
pm.test('Status code is 404', function () { pm.response.to.have.status([1]); });
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A404
B400
C200
D500
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 400 or 500 instead of 404.
Confusing 200 with 404.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to check if response JSON has a key 'status' equal to 'success'.

Postman
pm.test('Response status is success', function () { const jsonData = pm.response.json(); pm.expect(jsonData.[1]).to.eql([2]); });
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Astatus
B'success'
C'status'
Dsuccess
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using quotes around the key when accessing jsonData (should be without quotes).
Not quoting the expected string value.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to write a conditional test that checks if response code is 200 and response body contains 'OK'.

Postman
pm.test('Status 200 and body contains OK', function () { pm.expect(pm.response.code).to.equal([1]); pm.expect(pm.response.text()).to.include([2]); if (pm.response.code === [3]) { console.log('Response is OK'); } });
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A200
B'OK'
C404
D'Error'
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using wrong status codes like 404 in conditions.
Forgetting quotes around string 'OK'.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using default and conditional responses in Postman tests?
easy
A. To send multiple requests at the same time
B. To change the API endpoint dynamically
C. To check different API responses in one test script
D. To automatically generate API documentation

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the role of conditional responses

    Conditional responses allow testing different API replies based on conditions in one place.
  2. Step 2: Identify the main purpose

    This helps verify various outcomes without writing separate tests for each response.
  3. Final Answer:

    To check different API responses in one test script -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Default and conditional responses = test multiple replies [OK]
Hint: Think: one test script, many response checks [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing response testing with sending requests
  • Assuming it changes API endpoints
  • Mixing testing with documentation generation
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to write a conditional test in Postman to check if the response status is 200?
easy
A. pm.test('Status is 200', () => { if (pm.response.code === 200) { pm.expect(true).to.be.true; } });
B. pm.test('Status is 200', () => { pm.expect(pm.response.code).to.equal(200); });
C. pm.test('Status is 200', () => pm.response.code == 200);
D. pm.test('Status is 200', () => { if (pm.response.status == 200) pm.expect(true); });

Solution

  1. Step 1: Review Postman test syntax

    Postman uses pm.test with a callback function and pm.expect for assertions.
  2. Step 2: Identify correct assertion for status code

    pm.expect(pm.response.code).to.equal(200) correctly asserts status code equals 200.
  3. Final Answer:

    pm.test('Status is 200', () => { pm.expect(pm.response.code).to.equal(200); }); -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    pm.expect with .to.equal(200) = correct syntax [OK]
Hint: Use pm.expect with .to.equal for exact value checks [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using '==' instead of .to.equal() in assertions
  • Checking pm.response.status instead of pm.response.code
  • Not calling pm.expect properly inside pm.test
3. Given this Postman test code, what will be the test result if the response status is 404?
pm.test('Check response', () => {
  if (pm.response.code === 200) {
    pm.expect(pm.response.json().success).to.be.true;
  } else {
    pm.expect(pm.response.code).to.equal(404);
  }
});
medium
A. Test passes because status is 404 and matches else condition
B. Test fails because success property is missing
C. Test throws an error due to missing JSON body
D. Test passes only if success is true

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the if-else condition with status 404

    Status 404 triggers the else block which asserts pm.response.code equals 404.
  2. Step 2: Check assertion in else block

    pm.expect(pm.response.code).to.equal(404) will pass since status is 404.
  3. Final Answer:

    Test passes because status is 404 and matches else condition -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    404 status triggers else assertion = pass [OK]
Hint: Match status code to correct if/else branch [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming test fails due to missing success property
  • Thinking JSON parsing fails on 404
  • Ignoring else block assertions
4. Identify the error in this Postman test script that checks for a 201 status or a 400 error:
pm.test('Status check', () => {
  if (pm.response.code = 201) {
    pm.expect(pm.response.code).to.equal(201);
  } else if (pm.response.code = 400) {
    pm.expect(pm.response.json().error).to.exist;
  }
});
medium
A. No else block to handle other status codes
B. Missing pm.expect in the first if block
C. Incorrect JSON parsing method
D. Using assignment '=' instead of comparison '===' in if conditions

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check if condition syntax

    The code uses '=' which assigns value instead of '===' for comparison.
  2. Step 2: Understand impact of assignment in conditions

    Assignment always returns true, causing logic errors and wrong test behavior.
  3. Final Answer:

    Using assignment '=' instead of comparison '===' in if conditions -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Use '===' for comparisons, not '=' [OK]
Hint: Use '===' for comparisons, '=' is assignment [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing '=' with '==' or '==='
  • Ignoring that assignment returns a value
  • Not validating all possible status codes
5. You want to write a Postman test that checks if the response status is 200 and the JSON body has a 'data' field, but if the status is 404, it should check for an 'error' message. Which code snippet correctly implements this conditional response test?
hard
A. pm.test('Conditional response test', () => { if (pm.response.code === 200) { pm.expect(pm.response.json().data).to.exist; } else if (pm.response.code === 404) { pm.expect(pm.response.json().error).to.exist; } else { pm.expect.fail('Unexpected status code'); } });
B. pm.test('Conditional response test', () => { pm.expect(pm.response.code === 200 && pm.response.json().data).to.exist; pm.expect(pm.response.code === 404 && pm.response.json().error).to.exist; });
C. pm.test('Conditional response test', () => { if (pm.response.code = 200) { pm.expect(pm.response.json().data).to.exist; } else if (pm.response.code = 404) { pm.expect(pm.response.json().error).to.exist; } });
D. pm.test('Conditional response test', () => { pm.expect(pm.response.json().data || pm.response.json().error).to.exist; });

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check correct use of comparison operators

    pm.test('Conditional response test', () => { if (pm.response.code === 200) { pm.expect(pm.response.json().data).to.exist; } else if (pm.response.code === 404) { pm.expect(pm.response.json().error).to.exist; } else { pm.expect.fail('Unexpected status code'); } }); uses '===' for comparisons correctly. Using '=' causes assignment instead of comparison.
  2. Step 2: Verify conditional logic and assertions

    The code checks 'data' field existence for status 200, 'error' for 404, and explicitly fails for unexpected codes using pm.expect.fail().
  3. Step 3: Evaluate other options

    One option incorrectly combines status and field checks in single pm.expect statements, causing failures. Another does not condition on status codes at all.
  4. Final Answer:

    pm.test('Conditional response test', () => { if (pm.response.code === 200) { pm.expect(pm.response.json().data).to.exist; } else if (pm.response.code === 404) { pm.expect(pm.response.json().error).to.exist; } else { pm.expect.fail('Unexpected status code'); } }); -> Option A
  5. Quick Check:

    Use if-else with '===' and proper assertions [OK]
Hint: Use if-else with '===' and separate assertions [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using '=' instead of '===' in conditions
  • Combining conditions inside one pm.expect
  • Not handling unexpected status codes