Which scenario best indicates that a microservices architecture should be reverted back to a monolith?
Think about when microservices add more complexity than benefits.
Too many small services can increase operational overhead and make debugging difficult, which is a common reason to revert to a monolith for simplicity.
A startup has a small team and a product in early development. Which architecture choice is most suitable?
Consider simplicity and speed for small teams.
Starting with a monolith helps small teams move faster and avoid the overhead of managing many services.
Which scaling challenge is a strong signal to consider reverting from microservices to a monolith?
Think about communication overhead between services.
High network latency between many microservices can degrade performance, suggesting a monolith might be more efficient.
What is a major tradeoff when reverting from microservices back to a monolith?
Consider how deployment and team workflows change.
Reverting to a monolith simplifies deployment but reduces the ability for teams to deploy independently, potentially slowing releases.
A system has 50 microservices, each requiring 2 hours of daily maintenance. If reverted to a monolith requiring 10 hours daily maintenance, what is the daily operational overhead saved?
Calculate total hours before and after, then find the difference.
50 services * 2 hours = 100 hours before; monolith = 10 hours; saved = 100 - 10 = 90 hours.