Why When to use microservices (and when not to)? - Purpose & Use Cases

The Big Idea

What if fixing one small part of your app didn't mean stopping the whole thing?

The Scenario

Imagine running a big online store where every part--like payments, product listings, and user accounts--is all tangled together in one giant program.

When something breaks or needs an update, you have to stop the whole store, fix it, and start again.

The Problem

This big program is slow to change and hard to fix.

One small problem can crash everything.

Teams get stuck waiting on each other, and the store can't grow easily.

The Solution

Microservices split the big program into smaller, independent parts.

Each part can be built, fixed, and updated alone without stopping the whole store.

Teams can work faster and the system can grow smoothly.

Before vs After

✗ Before

def handle_request(request):
    process_payment(request)
    update_inventory(request)
    send_confirmation(request)

✓ After

def payment_service(request):
    # handle payment
    pass

def inventory_service(request):
    # update stock
    pass

def notification_service(request):
    # send confirmation
    pass

What It Enables

It lets you build big, flexible systems that can change and grow without breaking everything.

Real Life Example

Think of a popular streaming app where video playback, user profiles, and recommendations are separate services.

If the recommendation service needs an update, the rest of the app keeps working smoothly.

Key Takeaways

Big, tangled systems are hard to change and fix.

Microservices break systems into smaller, independent parts.

This makes updates safer, faster, and easier to manage.

Practice

1. Which scenario is best suited for using microservices architecture?

easy

A. A large, complex application requiring independent scaling of components

B. A simple, single-function app with a small user base

C. A small script running on a single machine

D. A static website with no backend logic

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand microservices purpose

   Microservices are designed for complex apps where parts can scale or update independently.

2. Step 2: Match scenario to microservices benefits

   A large app needing flexibility and scaling fits microservices well; small or simple apps do not.

3. Final Answer:

   A large, complex application requiring independent scaling of components -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Complex app = microservices [OK]

Hint: Use microservices only for complex, scalable apps [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Choosing microservices for small or simple apps
• Ignoring team size and management overhead
• Assuming microservices always improve performance

2. Which of the following is a correct reason NOT to use microservices?

easy

A. The app requires frequent updates to parts

B. The application is very small and simple

C. The app needs to scale independently

D. The app has multiple teams working on different features

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify when microservices are unnecessary

   Microservices add complexity and overhead, so small simple apps don't benefit.

2. Step 2: Evaluate options

   Options A, B, and D are reasons to use microservices, not avoid them.

3. Final Answer:

   The application is very small and simple -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Small app = avoid microservices [OK]

Hint: Avoid microservices for small, simple apps [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing scaling needs as a reason to avoid microservices
• Ignoring complexity added by microservices
• Assuming microservices fit all team sizes

3. Consider a microservices app with 5 services. If each service requires 2 developers and the team has only 6 developers total, what is the likely outcome?

medium

A. The team can easily manage all services independently

B. The services will merge into a monolith automatically

C. The team will struggle due to insufficient resources for each service

D. The app will automatically scale without developer input

Solution

1. Step 1: Calculate developer needs

   5 services x 2 developers each = 10 developers needed.

2. Step 2: Compare with available team size

   Only 6 developers are available, which is less than 10, causing resource strain.

3. Final Answer:

   The team will struggle due to insufficient resources for each service -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Dev shortage = struggle managing microservices [OK]

Hint: Check if team size matches microservices needs [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Assuming microservices scale developer needs automatically
• Ignoring team size constraints
• Thinking services merge automatically without effort

4. A team tries to convert a small monolithic app into microservices but faces deployment failures and communication errors. What is the most likely cause?

medium

A. Microservices do not support deployment automation

B. The app was too large for microservices

C. They used too many developers

D. They underestimated the complexity of managing microservices

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze the problem context

   Small apps converted to microservices often face complexity in communication and deployment.

2. Step 2: Identify the cause

   Deployment failures and communication errors usually come from underestimating microservices management overhead.

3. Final Answer:

   They underestimated the complexity of managing microservices -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Underestimating complexity = deployment issues [OK]

Hint: Expect extra management work with microservices [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Blaming microservices for deployment automation lack
• Assuming more developers cause deployment errors
• Thinking large apps cause these specific errors

5. A startup with a small team plans to build a new app. They want to decide between microservices and a monolithic design. Which approach should they choose and why?

hard

A. Start with a monolith to reduce complexity and switch later if needed

B. Start with microservices to prepare for future scaling immediately

C. Use microservices only if the app is a static website

D. Avoid both and build multiple separate apps

Solution

1. Step 1: Consider team size and app complexity

   A small team benefits from simpler monolithic design to reduce overhead and speed development.

2. Step 2: Plan for future growth

   Starting monolithic allows easier initial development; microservices can be adopted later if scaling is needed.

3. Final Answer:

   Start with a monolith to reduce complexity and switch later if needed -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Small team = start monolith [OK]

Hint: Small teams start monolith, scale to microservices later [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Choosing microservices too early for small teams
• Confusing static websites with microservices use
• Ignoring future scalability planning