Which scenario best justifies adopting a microservices architecture?
Think about when splitting into smaller services helps manage complexity and team independence.
Microservices are most beneficial when multiple teams work independently on different parts of a large system, allowing for better scalability and deployment flexibility.
What is a common downside of using microservices for a small, simple project?
Consider the management effort required for multiple services versus a single app.
For small projects, microservices add complexity and operational overhead that may not be justified by the benefits.
A company has a monolithic app that is growing rapidly. Which architectural change best supports scaling development and deployment?
Think about how to enable teams to work independently and deploy features separately.
Splitting into microservices by business capabilities allows independent scaling, deployment, and development, which suits a rapidly growing app.
What is a common challenge when scaling microservices that does not typically occur in monolithic apps?
Consider what happens when data is spread across multiple independent services.
Microservices often require complex strategies to keep data consistent across services, unlike monoliths where data is centralized.
A company plans to migrate from a monolith to 20 microservices. Which factor most increases operational overhead?
Think about what multiplies as the number of services grows.
Each microservice requires its own monitoring, logging, and alerting setup, increasing operational complexity significantly.