Performance: Resource controllers
Resource controllers affect server response time and client load speed by organizing route handling efficiently.
Route::resource('posts', PostController::class);
Route::get('/posts', [PostController::class, 'index']); Route::post('/posts', [PostController::class, 'store']); Route::get('/posts/create', [PostController::class, 'create']); Route::get('/posts/{id}', [PostController::class, 'show']); Route::put('/posts/{id}', [PostController::class, 'update']); Route::delete('/posts/{id}', [PostController::class, 'destroy']);
| Pattern | Route Definitions | Route Matching Cost | Server Response Time | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual route definitions for each CRUD action | Multiple lines | Multiple lookups per request | Higher due to overhead | [X] Bad |
| Single resource controller route | One line | Single lookup per request | Lower due to optimized matching | [OK] Good |
resource controller in Laravel?PostController for the route /posts?Route::resource('uri', ControllerClass::class) to register all resource routes.controller which is different. Route::get('posts', PostController::resource()); is invalid syntax. Route::resource('PostController', 'posts'); swaps parameters incorrectly.Route::resource('photos', PhotoController::class);destroy method in PhotoController for photo with ID 5?Route::resource('users', UserController::class);show method?Product but only want to generate routes for index, show, and store methods. Which is the correct way to register this in routes/web.php?only method with an array of method names.except(['create', 'edit']) which excludes only create and edit, leaving index, store, show, update, and destroy. B correctly uses only(['index', 'show', 'store']). C and D use invalid methods skip and filter.Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown