Given a GraphQL schema with nested types, and a depth limit of 2, what will be the result of this query?
{ user { id name posts { title comments { text } } } }Assume the depth limit blocks fields nested deeper than 2.
Depth limit 2 means fields nested more than 2 levels are blocked.
The query requests user (level 1), posts (level 2), and comments (level 3). Since depth limit is 2, comments are blocked, so only posts' titles are returned.
Choose the best reason why depth limiting is used in GraphQL APIs.
Think about server load and query complexity.
Depth limiting prevents clients from making very deep nested queries that can overload the server or cause slow responses.
Given a max depth of 3, which query will exceed the depth limit?
Count the nesting levels carefully.
Option B has nesting: user (1), posts (2), comments (3), author (4) which exceeds max depth 3.
Which approach best optimizes a GraphQL server to safely handle deep nested queries?
Think about server-side protections.
Depth limiting middleware protects the server by rejecting overly deep queries before execution.
Given a depth limit of 3, this query passes but the server is slow:
{ user { posts { comments { text } } } }Why might this happen?
Depth limit controls nesting, not number of items returned.
Even with limited depth, if each nested list is large, the total data volume can be huge causing slow performance.