This schema assigns costs to users and posts fields. The posts cost multiplies by the userId argument.
The sample query fetches users and posts for user 123.
GraphQL
type Query {
users: [User] @cost(complexity: 3)
posts(userId: ID!): [Post] @cost(complexity: 2, multipliers: ["userId"])
}
# Sample query
{
users {
id
name
}
posts(userId: "123") {
title
}
}
OutputSuccess
Important Notes
Costs help prevent very expensive queries from slowing down your server.
Multipliers let you adjust cost based on input values, like list sizes.
Always test your cost settings to balance protection and usability.
Summary
Field-level cost analysis assigns a cost number to each GraphQL field.
This helps track and limit query resource use.
Use @cost directive with complexity and optional multipliers.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using the @cost directive in GraphQL field-level cost analysis?
easy
A. To rename a field in the schema
B. To define the data type of a field
C. To specify the default value of a field
D. To assign a numeric cost to each field to track resource usage
Solution
Step 1: Understand the purpose of field-level cost analysis
Field-level cost analysis helps monitor and limit resource use by assigning costs to fields.
Step 2: Identify the role of the @cost directive
The @cost directive assigns a numeric complexity cost to each field to estimate query cost.
Final Answer:
To assign a numeric cost to each field to track resource usage -> Option D
Quick Check:
@cost assigns cost = A [OK]
Hint: Remember: @cost tracks resource use per field [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing cost with data type definition
Thinking @cost renames fields
Assuming it sets default values
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to add a cost directive with complexity 5 to a GraphQL field named books?
easy
A. books: [Book] @cost(complexity: 5)
B. books: [Book] @cost(5)
C. books: [Book] @cost(complexity=5)
D. books: [Book] @cost { complexity: 5 }
Solution
Step 1: Recall the correct directive syntax
The @cost directive uses parentheses with named arguments, e.g., @cost(complexity: 5).
Step 2: Check each option's syntax
books: [Book] @cost(complexity: 5) uses correct syntax with named argument and colon. The other three options use incorrect syntax forms.
Final Answer:
books: [Book] @cost(complexity: 5) -> Option A
Quick Check:
Correct directive syntax = B [OK]
Hint: Use parentheses and colon for directive args: @cost(complexity: 5) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using equal sign instead of colon
Omitting parentheses
Using braces instead of parentheses
3. Given the schema snippet:
type Query {
users: [User] @cost(complexity: 2, multipliers: ["first"])
}
input UserFilter {
first: Int
}
And the query:
{ users(first: 3) { id name } }
What is the total cost of this query assuming id and name fields have cost 1 each?
medium
A. 3
B. 6
C. 8
D. 5
Solution
Step 1: Calculate base complexity and multipliers
Base complexity is 2. The multiplier is the argument "first" with value 3, so multiply 2 * 3 = 6.
Step 2: Add cost of requested fields
Fields id and name each cost 1, total 2. Add to 6 gives 8.
Final Answer:
8 -> Option C
Quick Check:
2 * 3 + 1 + 1 = 8 [OK]
Hint: Multiply complexity by argument, then add field costs [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring multipliers
Not adding field costs
Multiplying fields cost instead of adding
4. Consider this incorrect directive usage:
type Query {
posts: [Post] @cost(complexity: "high")
}
What is the main error here?
medium
A. The complexity value must be an integer, not a string
B. The field name posts is invalid
C. The directive @cost cannot be used on lists
D. The directive syntax is missing parentheses
Solution
Step 1: Check the type of complexity argument
The complexity argument expects an integer value, but "high" is a string.
Step 2: Verify other parts of the directive usage
The field name and directive usage are valid; parentheses are present.
Final Answer:
The complexity value must be an integer, not a string -> Option A
Quick Check:
Complexity expects integer = D [OK]
Hint: Complexity must be a number, not text [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using string instead of integer for complexity
Thinking directive can't be on lists
Missing parentheses in directive
5. You have a GraphQL field comments with @cost(complexity: 1, multipliers: ["limit"]). The query requests comments(limit: 4) with subfields text and author, each costing 2. What is the total cost of this query?
hard
A. 12
B. 8
C. 10
D. 6
Solution
Step 1: Calculate base complexity with multiplier
Base complexity is 1. Multiplier is argument "limit" with value 4, so 1 * 4 = 4.
Step 2: Add cost of subfields
Subfields text and author each cost 2, total 4. Add to 4 gives 8.
Step 3: Verify the total
Subfields are added flatly without further multiplication by list size: 4 (base) + 4 (subfields) = 8.
Final Answer:
8 -> Option B
Quick Check:
1*4 + (2+2) = 8 [OK]
Hint: Add base cost times multiplier plus subfields cost [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Multiplying subfields cost by multiplier (e.g., getting 20)
Adding costs without multiplier
Confusing which costs to multiply
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.