Consider you are building a GraphQL API. What is the primary benefit of defining the schema before writing any resolver code?
Think about how defining the shape of data first helps teams work together.
Schema-first development means you design the API's data types and queries upfront. This helps frontend and backend developers understand and agree on the data format early, making collaboration smoother.
Given the schema below, what will be the result of the query?
type Query {
book(id: ID!): Book
}
type Book {
id: ID!
title: String!
author: String!
}
Query:
{
book(id: "1") {
title
author
}
}Assume the data source has a book with id "1", title "1984", and author "George Orwell".
Look at the query fields and the schema's Book type.
The query asks for title and author of the book with id "1". Since the data source has this book, the response includes both fields under data.book.
Which option contains the syntax error in the schema below?
type User {
id: ID!
name: String!
email: String!
friends: [User]
}
type Query {
user(id: ID!): User
}Assume the schema is used in a GraphQL server.Check the GraphQL list and nullability syntax rules.
The schema is valid. The 'friends' field is a list of User objects that can be null or contain nulls. This is allowed syntax in GraphQL.
You notice your GraphQL API is slow because many resolvers fetch data separately. Which approach best improves performance?
Think about how to reduce repeated database calls in resolvers.
Data loader batches multiple requests into one and caches results, reducing database load and improving performance in GraphQL resolvers.
Given this schema snippet, the server throws an error on startup:
type Query {
getUser(id: ID!): User
}
type User {
id: ID!
name: String!
bestFriend: User
}What is the most likely cause?
Think about whether self-referencing types are allowed in GraphQL schemas.
GraphQL supports self-referencing types like 'User' referencing 'User'. The schema is valid. Startup errors usually come from resolver code or server config, not this schema.