Bird
Raised Fist0
Elasticsearchquery~5 mins

Field and document level security in Elasticsearch

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Introduction

Field and document level security helps control who can see specific parts of your data. It keeps sensitive information safe by limiting access.

You want to hide salary details from most employees but show them to HR.
You need to show only customer names but not their contact info to support staff.
You want to restrict access to certain documents based on user roles.
You want to protect confidential fields like social security numbers from being visible.
You want to allow users to search only within documents they own.
Syntax
Elasticsearch
PUT /_security/role/role_name
{
  "indices": [
    {
      "names": ["index_name"],
      "privileges": ["read"],
      "field_security": {
        "grant": ["field1", "field2"]
      },
      "query": {
        "term": {
          "user_id": "{{_user.username}}"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

field_security.grant lists fields the user can see.

query filters documents the user can access.

Examples
This role lets HR read only name, salary, and department fields from the employees index.
Elasticsearch
PUT /_security/role/hr_role
{
  "indices": [
    {
      "names": ["employees"],
      "privileges": ["read"],
      "field_security": {
        "grant": ["name", "salary", "department"]
      }
    }
  ]
}
This role lets support staff read only name and email fields from customers in the 'us-east' region.
Elasticsearch
PUT /_security/role/support_role
{
  "indices": [
    {
      "names": ["customers"],
      "privileges": ["read"],
      "field_security": {
        "grant": ["name", "email"]
      },
      "query": {
        "term": {
          "region": "us-east"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}
This role allows users to read only documents they own, no field restrictions.
Elasticsearch
PUT /_security/role/owner_role
{
  "indices": [
    {
      "names": ["documents"],
      "privileges": ["read"],
      "query": {
        "term": {
          "owner": "{{_user.username}}"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}
Sample Program

This example creates a role that lets users read only the report_name and total_revenue fields from financial_reports index, but only for documents where department is 'finance'.

When a user with this role searches, they see only allowed fields and documents.

Elasticsearch
PUT /_security/role/finance_role
{
  "indices": [
    {
      "names": ["financial_reports"],
      "privileges": ["read"],
      "field_security": {
        "grant": ["report_name", "total_revenue"]
      },
      "query": {
        "term": {
          "department": "finance"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

# After creating this role, assign it to a user to restrict their access.

GET /financial_reports/_search
{
  "query": {
    "match_all": {}
  }
}
OutputSuccess
Important Notes

Field and document level security works together to limit data exposure.

Use {{_user.username}} to personalize document access based on the logged-in user.

Remember to assign roles to users after creating them.

Summary

Field level security controls which fields a user can see.

Document level security controls which documents a user can access.

Together, they protect sensitive data in Elasticsearch.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of field-level security in Elasticsearch?
easy
A. To restrict access to specific fields within documents
B. To encrypt the entire Elasticsearch index
C. To limit the number of documents returned in a query
D. To control user login credentials

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand field-level security concept

    Field-level security controls which fields in a document a user can see or query.
  2. Step 2: Compare with other options

    Encryption and login control are unrelated to field-level security; limiting documents is document-level security.
  3. Final Answer:

    To restrict access to specific fields within documents -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Field-level security = restrict fields [OK]
Hint: Field-level security hides fields, not whole documents [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing field-level with document-level security
  • Thinking it encrypts data
  • Assuming it controls user passwords
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to define field-level security in an Elasticsearch role?
easy
A. "fields": ["title", "author"]
B. "field_security": { "deny": ["title", "author"] }
C. "field_security": { "grant": ["title", "author"] }
D. "field_access": { "allow": ["title", "author"] }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall correct field-level security syntax

    Elasticsearch uses "field_security" with a "grant" array to specify allowed fields.
  2. Step 2: Eliminate incorrect options

    "deny" is not valid here; "fields" and "field_access" are incorrect keys.
  3. Final Answer:

    "field_security": { "grant": ["title", "author"] } -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Use "field_security" with "grant" for allowed fields [OK]
Hint: Use "field_security" with "grant" to allow fields [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using "deny" instead of "grant"
  • Wrong key names like "fields" or "field_access"
  • Confusing syntax with document-level security
3. Given this role definition snippet:
{
  "indices": [
    {
      "names": ["books"],
      "privileges": ["read"],
      "query": { "term": { "genre": "fiction" } },
      "field_security": { "grant": ["title", "author"] }
    }
  ]
}

What documents and fields will a user with this role see when querying the books index?
medium
A. All documents showing all fields
B. All documents showing only 'title' and 'author' fields
C. Only documents where genre is 'fiction' showing all fields
D. Only documents where genre is 'fiction' showing only 'title' and 'author' fields

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze document-level security query

    The "query" limits documents to those with genre 'fiction'.
  2. Step 2: Analyze field-level security grant

    Only "title" and "author" fields are visible due to "field_security".
  3. Final Answer:

    Only documents where genre is 'fiction' showing only 'title' and 'author' fields -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Query filters docs + grant limits fields = Only documents where genre is 'fiction' showing only 'title' and 'author' fields [OK]
Hint: Query filters docs; field_security limits fields shown [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring the query filter on documents
  • Assuming all fields are visible
  • Confusing document and field level restrictions
4. You defined this role snippet:
{
  "indices": [
    {
      "names": ["library"],
      "privileges": ["read"],
      "query": { "term": { "category": "science" } },
      "field_security": { "grant": ["title", "summary"] }
    }
  ]
}

But users report they see all documents and fields. What is the likely error?
medium
A. The query filter is incorrect or not applied properly
B. Field names in grant are misspelled
C. Privileges should include "write" to restrict fields
D. Role must include "manage" privilege for security to work

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check query filter correctness

    If the query filter is malformed or ignored, document filtering won't happen.
  2. Step 2: Verify field_security and privileges

    Field names look correct; "read" privilege is enough for filtering; "write" or "manage" not needed.
  3. Final Answer:

    The query filter is incorrect or not applied properly -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Query filter controls docs; if ignored, all docs show [OK]
Hint: Check query syntax if document filtering fails [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming 'write' privilege needed for filtering
  • Ignoring query filter syntax errors
  • Thinking field names cause document filtering issues
5. You want to create a role that allows users to read only documents where status is active and see only the name and email fields. Which role definition snippet correctly implements this?
hard
A. { "indices": [ { "names": ["users"], "privileges": ["read"], "query": { "match": { "status": "active" } }, "field_security": { "deny": ["password"] } } ] }
B. { "indices": [ { "names": ["users"], "privileges": ["read"], "query": { "term": { "status": "active" } }, "field_security": { "grant": ["name", "email"] } } ] }
C. { "indices": [ { "names": ["users"], "privileges": ["read"], "query": { "term": { "status": "active" } }, "fields": ["name", "email"] } ] }
D. { "indices": [ { "names": ["users"], "privileges": ["read"], "query": { "term": { "status": "active" } } } ] }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Verify document-level security query

    Using "term" query on "status" with "active" correctly filters documents.
  2. Step 2: Verify field-level security syntax

    "field_security" with "grant" array specifying "name" and "email" fields is correct.
  3. Step 3: Eliminate incorrect options

    { "indices": [ { "names": ["users"], "privileges": ["read"], "query": { "match": { "status": "active" } }, "field_security": { "deny": ["password"] } } ] } uses "deny" which is invalid; { "indices": [ { "names": ["users"], "privileges": ["read"], "query": { "term": { "status": "active" } }, "fields": ["name", "email"] } ] } uses wrong key "fields"; { "indices": [ { "names": ["users"], "privileges": ["read"], "query": { "term": { "status": "active" } } } ] } lacks field-level security.
  4. Final Answer:

    Role with "query" term filter and "field_security" grant for "name" and "email" -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Use "query" for docs + "field_security" grant for fields [OK]
Hint: Use "query" for docs and "field_security" with "grant" for fields [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using "deny" instead of "grant" in field_security
  • Using wrong keys like "fields" instead of "field_security"
  • Omitting field-level security to restrict fields