Application performance monitoring helps you see how well your app works. It shows if parts are slow or have errors.
Application performance monitoring in Elasticsearch
PUT /apm-7.17.0 { "settings": { "index": { "number_of_shards": 1 } }, "mappings": { "properties": { "transaction.duration.us": { "type": "long" }, "transaction.name": { "type": "keyword" }, "service.name": { "type": "keyword" }, "timestamp": { "type": "date" } } } }
This example creates an index for storing APM data in Elasticsearch.
Fields like transaction.duration.us measure how long a request takes in microseconds.
GET /apm-7.17.0/_search { "query": { "match": { "service.name": "my-app" } } }
GET /apm-7.17.0/_search { "aggs": { "avg_duration": { "avg": { "field": "transaction.duration.us" } } } }
POST /apm-7.17.0/_doc { "service.name": "my-app", "transaction.name": "GET /home", "transaction.duration.us": 150000, "timestamp": "2024-06-01T12:00:00Z" }
This query finds the average response time for the service named "my-app" from the APM data.
POST /apm-7.17.0/_search { "size": 0, "aggs": { "avg_response_time": { "avg": { "field": "transaction.duration.us" } } }, "query": { "term": { "service.name": "my-app" } } }
APM data is often stored in Elasticsearch indexes with specific mappings for performance metrics.
Use Kibana or other tools to visualize APM data easily.
Keep your APM data size manageable by setting retention policies.
Application performance monitoring helps track app speed and errors.
Elasticsearch stores and queries APM data using indexes and aggregations.
Average response time is a key metric to watch for app health.
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand APM's role
APM is designed to monitor how fast an application runs and to find any errors it produces.Step 2: Match purpose with options
Only To track application speed and detect errors describes tracking speed and errors, which fits APM's main goal.Final Answer:
To track application speed and detect errors -> Option AQuick Check:
APM purpose = Track speed and errors [OK]
- Confusing APM with security or backup tools
- Thinking APM manages cluster nodes
- Assuming APM stores user credentials
Solution
Step 1: Identify aggregation for average
The query uses "avg" aggregation on the field "transaction.duration.us" which stores response times in microseconds.Step 2: Confirm query structure
Size is 0 to avoid returning documents, focusing only on aggregation results, which is correct for average calculation.Final Answer:
GET /apm-*/_search {"size":0, "aggs": {"avg_response_time": {"avg": {"field": "transaction.duration.us"}}}} -> Option CQuick Check:
Average aggregation query = GET /apm-*/_search {"size":0, "aggs": {"avg_response_time": {"avg": {"field": "transaction.duration.us"}}}} [OK]
- Using match_all without aggregation
- Using update_by_query instead of search
- Using max aggregation instead of avg
GET /apm-*/_search
{
"size": 0,
"aggs": {
"avg_response_time": {
"avg": { "field": "transaction.duration.us" }
}
}
}Solution
Step 1: Understand aggregation type
The query requests the average of the field "transaction.duration.us" which holds response times in microseconds.Step 2: Match output to aggregation
The output shows an aggregation named "avg_response_time" with a numeric value representing the average, matching {"aggregations":{"avg_response_time":{"value":250000}}}.Final Answer:
{"aggregations":{"avg_response_time":{"value":250000}}} -> Option DQuick Check:
Average aggregation output = {"aggregations":{"avg_response_time":{"value":250000}}} [OK]
- Confusing hits total with aggregation result
- Expecting max instead of avg
- Assuming error without checking field existence
Fielddata is disabled on text fields by default. What is the likely cause?Solution
Step 1: Analyze error message
The error says fielddata is disabled on text fields, which means aggregation was attempted on a text field.Step 2: Understand aggregation requirements
Aggregations like average require numeric fields, so using a text field causes this error.Final Answer:
Trying to aggregate on a text field instead of a numeric field -> Option AQuick Check:
Fielddata error = Aggregation on text field [OK]
- Blaming index pattern or auth for this error
- Assuming syntax error without checking field type
- Ignoring field data type requirements
Solution
Step 1: Identify filter for transactions with errors
Transactions with errors have a non-empty "error.id" field, so we use "exists" query on "error.id".Step 2: Confirm aggregation on filtered data
The aggregation calculates average response time only on filtered documents, which is correct.Final Answer:
{ "size": 0, "query": { "exists": { "field": "error.id" } }, "aggs": { "avg_response_time": { "avg": { "field": "transaction.duration.us" } } } } -> Option BQuick Check:
Filter errors with exists + avg aggregation = { "size": 0, "query": { "exists": { "field": "error.id" } }, "aggs": { "avg_response_time": { "avg": { "field": "transaction.duration.us" } } } } [OK]
- Using empty term query instead of exists
- Calculating average without filtering errors
- Filtering for success instead of errors
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
