Thinking it modifies data instead of analyzing text
Assuming it deletes or updates documents
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to test the standard analyzer on the text "Hello World" using the /_analyze API?
easy
A. { "analyzer": "standard", "text": "Hello World" }
B. { "analyzer": "standard" "text": "Hello World" }
C. { "text": "Hello World", "analyzer": standard }
D. { analyzer: "standard", text: "Hello World" }
Solution
Step 1: Check JSON syntax for /_analyze request body
The body must be valid JSON with keys as strings and values properly quoted. { "analyzer": "standard", "text": "Hello World" } uses correct JSON syntax.
Step 2: Identify errors in other options
{ "analyzer": "standard" "text": "Hello World" } misses a comma between keys. { "text": "Hello World", "analyzer": standard } lacks quotes around "standard". { analyzer: "standard", text: "Hello World" } uses unquoted keys, invalid in JSON.
Final Answer:
{ "analyzer": "standard", "text": "Hello World" } -> Option A
Quick Check:
Valid JSON with quoted keys and values = { "analyzer": "standard", "text": "Hello World" } [OK]
Hint: Always use quotes around keys and string values in JSON [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Missing commas between JSON fields
Not quoting string values
Using unquoted keys in JSON
3. Given this request to /_analyze API with the standard analyzer:
{ "analyzer": "standard", "text": "Quick brown fox" }
What is the expected list of tokens returned?
medium
A. ["quick brown", "fox"]
B. ["quick", "brown", "fox"]
C. ["Quick", "brown", "fox"]
D. ["quick", "brown fox"]
Solution
Step 1: Understand standard analyzer behavior
The standard analyzer lowercases text and splits on whitespace and punctuation, so "Quick brown fox" becomes tokens "quick", "brown", "fox".
Step 2: Check options for token case and splitting
["quick", "brown", "fox"] shows all lowercase separate tokens. ["Quick", "brown", "fox"] keeps uppercase 'Quick' which standard analyzer lowercases. Options that combine words are incorrect.
Final Answer:
["quick", "brown", "fox"] -> Option B
Quick Check:
Standard analyzer lowercases and splits words [OK]
Hint: Standard analyzer lowercases and splits on spaces [OK]
But the output tokens include punctuation marks like "Hello," instead of just "Hello". What is the likely cause?
medium
A. Using the whitespace analyzer which only splits on spaces, not removing punctuation
B. The standard analyzer was used instead of whitespace
C. The text was not provided in the request body
D. The analyzer automatically removes punctuation by default
Solution
Step 1: Recall whitespace analyzer behavior
The whitespace analyzer splits text only on spaces and does not remove punctuation, so tokens keep punctuation marks.
Step 2: Eliminate other options
The standard analyzer was used instead of whitespace is incorrect because the standard analyzer removes punctuation. The text was not provided in the request body is invalid because text is provided. The analyzer automatically removes punctuation by default is false; whitespace analyzer does not remove punctuation.
Final Answer:
Using the whitespace analyzer which only splits on spaces, not removing punctuation -> Option A
Quick Check:
Whitespace analyzer keeps punctuation in tokens [OK]
Hint: Whitespace analyzer splits only on spaces, keeps punctuation [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Expecting punctuation removal with whitespace analyzer
Confusing analyzer names
Omitting text in request body
5. You want to test a custom analyzer named "my_custom_analyzer" that uses a lowercase filter and a stopword filter removing "the" and "and". Which /_analyze request body will correctly show tokens for the text "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog"?
hard
A. { "analyzer": "standard", "filter": ["lowercase", "stop"], "text": "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog" }
B. { "analyzer": "my_custom_analyzer", "text": "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog", "stopwords": ["the", "and"] }
C. { "tokenizer": "standard", "filter": ["lowercase", "stop"], "text": "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog" }
D. { "analyzer": "my_custom_analyzer", "text": "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog" }
Solution
Step 1: Use the custom analyzer name in the /_analyze request
To test a custom analyzer, specify its name under the "analyzer" key with the text to analyze. { "analyzer": "my_custom_analyzer", "text": "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog" } does this correctly.
Step 2: Understand why other options are incorrect
{ "analyzer": "my_custom_analyzer", "text": "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog", "stopwords": ["the", "and"] } incorrectly tries to add stopwords in the request body, which is not supported here. { "tokenizer": "standard", "filter": ["lowercase", "stop"], "text": "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog" } tries to define tokenizer and filters inline, which is invalid for /_analyze without full analyzer definition. { "analyzer": "standard", "filter": ["lowercase", "stop"], "text": "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog" } uses standard analyzer, not the custom one.
Final Answer:
{ "analyzer": "my_custom_analyzer", "text": "The quick brown fox and the lazy dog" } -> Option D
Quick Check:
Use custom analyzer name directly in /_analyze [OK]
Hint: Pass custom analyzer name directly to /_analyze [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Trying to redefine filters in /_analyze request
Using standard analyzer instead of custom
Adding unsupported keys like stopwords in request body
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.