Bird
Raised Fist0
Elasticsearchquery~5 mins

Nested aggregations in Elasticsearch

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Introduction

Nested aggregations help you group and analyze data inside other groups. This lets you explore details step by step, like looking inside boxes within boxes.

You want to find the average price of products grouped by category and then by brand.
You need to count how many users visited each country and then each city inside that country.
You want to see sales totals by year and then by month within each year.
You want to analyze customer reviews by product and then by rating score.
Syntax
Elasticsearch
{
  "aggs": {
    "group1": {
      "terms": { "field": "field1.keyword" },
      "aggs": {
        "group2": {
          "terms": { "field": "field2.keyword" }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Each aggregation can contain another aggregation inside the aggs key.

The inner aggregation works on the results of the outer aggregation.

Examples
This groups products first by category, then inside each category by brand.
Elasticsearch
{
  "aggs": {
    "by_category": {
      "terms": { "field": "category.keyword" },
      "aggs": {
        "by_brand": {
          "terms": { "field": "brand.keyword" }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
This groups data by year, then inside each year by month using date histograms.
Elasticsearch
{
  "aggs": {
    "by_year": {
      "date_histogram": {
        "field": "date",
        "calendar_interval": "year"
      },
      "aggs": {
        "by_month": {
          "date_histogram": {
            "field": "date",
            "calendar_interval": "month"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
Sample Program

This query counts documents grouped by country, then inside each country by city.

Elasticsearch
{
  "size": 0,
  "aggs": {
    "by_country": {
      "terms": { "field": "country.keyword" },
      "aggs": {
        "by_city": {
          "terms": { "field": "city.keyword" }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
OutputSuccess
Important Notes

Nested aggregations let you explore data step by step, like peeling layers of an onion.

Make sure the fields you use for grouping are keyword or not analyzed fields for exact matches.

Summary

Nested aggregations group data inside other groups.

Use the aggs key inside an aggregation to add a nested aggregation.

This helps analyze data in multiple levels, like country then city.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of nested aggregations in Elasticsearch?
easy
A. To sort documents by a single field
B. To group data inside other groups for multi-level analysis
C. To filter documents based on a condition
D. To update documents in bulk

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall aggregation basics

    Aggregations group data to summarize or analyze it.
  2. Step 2: Examine nested aggregations

    Nested aggregations group data inside other groups for detailed multi-level insights.
  3. Final Answer:

    To group data inside other groups for multi-level analysis -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Nested aggregations = multi-level grouping [OK]
Hint: Nested aggs always use 'aggs' inside another aggregation [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing nested aggregations with filters
  • Thinking nested aggregations sort data
  • Assuming nested aggregations update documents
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to add a nested aggregation inside a terms aggregation in Elasticsearch?
easy
A. "aggs": { "country": { "terms": { "field": "country" }, "aggs": { "city": { "terms": { "field": "city" } } } } }
B. "nested": { "aggs": { "terms": { "field": "city" } } }
C. "aggs": { "nested_agg": { "terms": { "field": "city" } } }
D. "aggs": { "terms": { "field": "city" }, "aggs": { "nested_agg": { "terms": { "field": "country" } } } }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify correct nested aggregation structure

    Nested aggregations are placed inside the "aggs" key of a parent aggregation.
  2. Step 2: Check "aggs": { "country": { "terms": { "field": "country" }, "aggs": { "city": { "terms": { "field": "city" } } } } } structure

    "aggs": { "country": { "terms": { "field": "country" }, "aggs": { "city": { "terms": { "field": "city" } } } } } shows a terms aggregation on "country" with a nested terms aggregation on "city" inside its "aggs" key, which is correct syntax.
  3. Final Answer:

    "aggs": { "country": { "terms": { "field": "country" }, "aggs": { "city": { "terms": { "field": "city" } } } } } -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Nested aggs inside parent's "aggs" key = "aggs": { "country": { "terms": { "field": "country" }, "aggs": { "city": { "terms": { "field": "city" } } } } } [OK]
Hint: Nested aggs go inside parent's "aggs" key, not outside [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Placing multiple "aggs" keys at the same level
  • Using "nested" keyword incorrectly
  • Missing the "aggs" key inside parent aggregation
3. Given this Elasticsearch aggregation query snippet:
{
  "aggs": {
    "by_country": {
      "terms": { "field": "country" },
      "aggs": {
        "by_city": {
          "terms": { "field": "city" }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

What does the nested aggregation by_city do?
medium
A. Groups documents by city inside each country group
B. Filters documents only from one city
C. Sorts countries by city name
D. Counts total documents ignoring country

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the outer aggregation

    "by_country" groups documents by the "country" field.
  2. Step 2: Analyze the nested aggregation

    Inside each country group, "by_city" groups documents by the "city" field.
  3. Final Answer:

    Groups documents by city inside each country group -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Nested terms aggregation groups inside parent group [OK]
Hint: Nested terms aggs group data inside parent buckets [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking nested aggs filter data
  • Assuming nested aggs sort data
  • Ignoring the parent aggregation grouping
4. Identify the error in this nested aggregation query:
{
  "aggs": {
    "countries": {
      "terms": { "field": "country" },
      "terms": {
        "field": "city"
      }
    }
  }
}
medium
A. Using "terms" twice at the same level is correct
B. Aggregation names cannot be plural
C. Field names "country" and "city" must be the same
D. Missing nested "aggs" key for the city aggregation

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check aggregation structure

    Each aggregation can have only one aggregation type key like "terms" at its level.
  2. Step 2: Identify nested aggregation placement

    Nested aggregations must be inside an "aggs" key, but here "terms" is repeated instead of nesting inside "aggs".
  3. Final Answer:

    Missing nested "aggs" key for the city aggregation -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Nested aggs require "aggs" key inside parent [OK]
Hint: Nested aggs must be inside "aggs", not repeated aggregation keys [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Repeating aggregation type keys at same level
  • Not nesting inside "aggs" key
  • Confusing aggregation names with field names
5. You want to analyze sales data by region, then by product category, and finally by brand using nested aggregations. Which of the following query structures correctly implements this three-level nested aggregation?
hard
A. { "aggs": { "region": { "terms": { "field": "region" }, "terms": { "field": "category" }, "terms": { "field": "brand" } } } }
B. { "aggs": { "region": { "terms": { "field": "region" } }, "category": { "terms": { "field": "category" } }, "brand": { "terms": { "field": "brand" } } } }
C. { "aggs": { "region": { "terms": { "field": "region" }, "aggs": { "category": { "terms": { "field": "category" }, "aggs": { "brand": { "terms": { "field": "brand" } } } } } } } }
D. { "aggs": { "brand": { "terms": { "field": "brand" }, "aggs": { "category": { "terms": { "field": "category" }, "aggs": { "region": { "terms": { "field": "region" } } } } } } } }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the required nesting order

    We want to group first by region, then inside each region by category, then inside each category by brand.
  2. Step 2: Check each option's structure

    { "aggs": { "region": { "terms": { "field": "region" }, "aggs": { "category": { "terms": { "field": "category" }, "aggs": { "brand": { "terms": { "field": "brand" } } } } } } } correctly nests "category" inside "region"'s "aggs", and "brand" inside "category"'s "aggs". Others either flatten or reverse order.
  3. Final Answer:

    { "aggs": { "region": { "terms": { "field": "region" }, "aggs": { "category": { "terms": { "field": "category" }, "aggs": { "brand": { "terms": { "field": "brand" } } } } } } } -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Nested aggs inside parent's "aggs" in correct order = { "aggs": { "region": { "terms": { "field": "region" }, "aggs": { "category": { "terms": { "field": "category" }, "aggs": { "brand": { "terms": { "field": "brand" } } } } } } } [OK]
Hint: Nest each level inside previous level's "aggs" key [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Placing all aggregations at top level without nesting
  • Repeating aggregation keys at same level
  • Reversing the desired grouping order
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard