Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Typescriptprogramming~10 mins

Top K Frequent Elements Using Heap in DSA Typescript - Interactive Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to count the frequency of each number in the array.

DSA Typescript
const frequencyMap = new Map<number, number>();
for (const num of nums) {
  frequencyMap.set(num, (frequencyMap.get(num) || 0) [1] 1);
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A-
B+
C*
D/
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using '-' instead of '+' will decrease the count.
Using '*' or '/' will not correctly count frequency.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to push elements into the heap with their frequency as priority.

DSA Typescript
for (const [num, freq] of frequencyMap.entries()) {
  heap.push({ value: num, priority: [1] });
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Afreq
Bnum
Cfreq + 1
Dfreq - 1
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Multiplying or dividing frequency changes the priority incorrectly.
Subtracting 1 may cause wrong priority.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the code to maintain the heap size at most k by removing the smallest frequency element.

DSA Typescript
if (heap.size() > k) {
  heap.[1]();
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Ainsert
Bpush
Cpeek
Dpop
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using push or insert adds elements instead of removing.
peek only returns the top without removing.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to extract the top k frequent elements from the heap into the result array.

DSA Typescript
const result: number[] = [];
while (heap.size() > 0) {
  const top = heap.[1]();
  result.[2](top.value);
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Apop
Bpush
Cpeek
Dshift
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using peek does not remove elements from the heap.
Using shift is for arrays, not heaps.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to return the result array reversed so the most frequent elements come first.

DSA Typescript
return result.[1]().[2]((a, b) => b [3] a);
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Areverse
Bsort
C-
D+
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using '+' in the sort comparison will not sort correctly.
Not reversing will give least frequent first.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using a heap in the Top K Frequent Elements problem?
easy
A. To store elements without any order
B. To sort all elements in ascending order
C. To remove duplicates from the list
D. To efficiently keep track of the top K frequent elements by frequency

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem goal

    The goal is to find the K elements that appear most frequently in a list.
  2. Step 2: Role of heap in this context

    A heap helps efficiently keep track of the top K elements by frequency without sorting the entire list.
  3. Final Answer:

    To efficiently keep track of the top K frequent elements by frequency -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Heap = Efficient top K tracking [OK]
Hint: Heap keeps top K elements efficiently by frequency [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking heap sorts all elements fully
  • Confusing heap with simple array storage
  • Assuming heap removes duplicates
2. Which of the following TypeScript code snippets correctly initializes a min-heap to store pairs of [frequency, element] for the Top K Frequent Elements problem?
easy
A. const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{freq: number, val: number}>({priority: x => x.freq});
B. const minHeap = new Array();
C. const minHeap = new Map();
D. const minHeap = new Set<[number, number]>();

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify correct heap initialization syntax

    TypeScript with modern libraries uses MinPriorityQueue with a priority function for min-heap.
  2. Step 2: Check each option

    const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{freq: number, val: number}>({priority: x => x.freq}); correctly creates a min-heap with priority based on frequency. Others are arrays, maps, or sets which do not provide heap behavior.
  3. Final Answer:

    const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{freq: number, val: number}>({priority: x => x.freq}); -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    MinPriorityQueue with priority function = correct heap [OK]
Hint: Use MinPriorityQueue with priority function for min-heap [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using Array instead of heap
  • Using Map or Set which are not heaps
  • Missing priority function in heap initialization
3. What will be the output of the following TypeScript code snippet for nums = [1,1,1,2,2,3] and k = 2?
function topKFrequent(nums: number[], k: number): number[] {
  const freqMap = new Map();
  for (const num of nums) {
    freqMap.set(num, (freqMap.get(num) || 0) + 1);
  }
  const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{val: number, freq: number}>({priority: x => x.freq});
  for (const [num, freq] of freqMap.entries()) {
    minHeap.enqueue({val: num, freq});
    if (minHeap.size() > k) {
      minHeap.dequeue();
    }
  }
  const result = [];
  while (minHeap.size() > 0) {
    result.push(minHeap.dequeue().element.val);
  }
  return result.reverse();
}
console.log(topKFrequent([1,1,1,2,2,3], 2));
medium
A. [3, 2]
B. [1, 2]
C. [2, 1]
D. [1, 3]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Calculate frequencies

    Frequencies: 1 -> 3 times, 2 -> 2 times, 3 -> 1 time.
  2. Step 2: Use min-heap to keep top 2 frequent elements

    Insert (1,3), (2,2), (3,1). When size > 2, remove smallest freq. So 3 with freq 1 is removed.
  3. Step 3: Extract elements from heap and reverse

    Heap contains (1,3) and (2,2). Extracted order reversed gives [1, 2].
  4. Final Answer:

    [1, 2] -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Top 2 frequent = [1, 2] [OK]
Hint: Keep heap size ≤ k, remove smallest frequency [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not reversing result array
  • Removing wrong element from heap
  • Confusing frequency counts
4. Identify the bug in the following TypeScript code for finding top K frequent elements:
function topKFrequent(nums: number[], k: number): number[] {
  const freqMap = new Map();
  for (const num of nums) {
    freqMap.set(num, freqMap.get(num) + 1);
  }
  const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{val: number, freq: number}>({priority: x => x.freq});
  for (const [num, freq] of freqMap.entries()) {
    minHeap.enqueue({val: num, freq});
    if (minHeap.size() > k) {
      minHeap.dequeue();
    }
  }
  const result = [];
  while (minHeap.size() > 0) {
    result.push(minHeap.dequeue().element.val);
  }
  return result.reverse();
}
medium
A. Map should be replaced with Set
B. minHeap.dequeue() removes wrong element
C. freqMap.get(num) + 1 causes error when num not in map
D. result.reverse() is unnecessary

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check frequency map update line

    freqMap.get(num) returns undefined if num not present, so undefined + 1 causes NaN.
  2. Step 2: Correct way to update frequency

    Use freqMap.get(num) || 0 to default to 0 if undefined, then add 1.
  3. Final Answer:

    freqMap.get(num) + 1 causes error when num not in map -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Undefined + 1 = NaN error [OK]
Hint: Use (freqMap.get(num) || 0) + 1 to avoid undefined [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not handling undefined in map get
  • Removing wrong element from heap
  • Thinking reverse is unnecessary
  • Replacing Map with Set incorrectly
5. Given a large array nums with many elements having the same frequency, how can you modify the heap approach to ensure the Top K Frequent Elements always returns the smallest elements when frequencies tie? Choose the best approach.
hard
A. Use a heap with priority comparing frequency first, then element value to break ties
B. Sort the entire array before building the heap
C. Use a max-heap instead of a min-heap without tie-break logic
D. Ignore tie cases as they do not affect the result

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand tie frequency problem

    When multiple elements share frequency, we want consistent ordering by element value.
  2. Step 2: Modify heap priority to handle ties

    Use a comparator that first compares frequency, then element value to break ties, ensuring smallest elements come first.
  3. Step 3: Why other options fail

    Sorting entire array is inefficient; max-heap without tie-break can give inconsistent results; ignoring ties causes unpredictable output.
  4. Final Answer:

    Use a heap with priority comparing frequency first, then element value to break ties -> Option A
  5. Quick Check:

    Priority with tie-break = correct tie handling [OK]
Hint: Add tie-break by element value in heap priority [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Sorting entire array wastes time
  • Ignoring tie-break leads to wrong output
  • Using max-heap without tie-break causes inconsistency
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard