What is the main idea behind using a heap to find the top K frequent elements?
Use a heap to keep track of the K elements with the highest frequency by pushing elements and popping the least frequent when size exceeds K.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What type of heap is commonly used to solve the Top K Frequent Elements problem efficiently?
A min-heap is used to keep the smallest frequency element at the top, so when the heap size exceeds K, the least frequent element can be removed.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why do we use a frequency map before using the heap in this problem?
The frequency map counts how many times each element appears, which helps us know the frequency to compare when adding elements to the heap.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
In TypeScript, which data structure can be used to implement a min-heap for this problem?
A priority queue or a custom binary heap class can be implemented to act as a min-heap since TypeScript does not have a built-in heap.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of finding the top K frequent elements using a heap?
O(N log K), where N is the number of elements, because each element is pushed and popped from the heap of size K.
Click to reveal answer
What does the heap store in the Top K Frequent Elements problem?
AElements with their frequencies
BOnly elements without frequency
COnly frequencies without elements
DSorted list of all elements
✗ Incorrect
The heap stores pairs of elements and their frequencies to compare and keep track of the top K frequent elements.
Why do we remove elements from the heap when its size exceeds K?
ATo keep only the K most frequent elements
BTo sort the elements
CTo count frequencies
DTo convert heap to array
✗ Incorrect
Removing elements when heap size exceeds K ensures only the K elements with highest frequency remain.
Which data structure is used to count the frequency of elements before using the heap?
AArray
BHash map or dictionary
CStack
DQueue
✗ Incorrect
A hash map or dictionary is used to count how many times each element appears.
What is the role of a min-heap in this problem?
ATo sort elements alphabetically
BTo keep the most frequent element on top
CTo keep the least frequent element on top for easy removal
DTo store all elements
✗ Incorrect
The min-heap keeps the smallest frequency element on top so it can be removed when heap size exceeds K.
What is the overall time complexity of this approach?
AO(N)
BO(N^2)
CO(K log N)
DO(N log K)
✗ Incorrect
Building the frequency map is O(N), and pushing/popping from a heap of size K for N elements is O(N log K).
Explain step-by-step how to find the top K frequent elements using a heap.
Think about counting first, then keeping only K elements with highest counts.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe why a min-heap is preferred over a max-heap for this problem.
Focus on how to efficiently keep only K elements.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using a heap in the Top K Frequent Elements problem?
easy
A. To store elements without any order
B. To sort all elements in ascending order
C. To remove duplicates from the list
D. To efficiently keep track of the top K frequent elements by frequency
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem goal
The goal is to find the K elements that appear most frequently in a list.
Step 2: Role of heap in this context
A heap helps efficiently keep track of the top K elements by frequency without sorting the entire list.
Final Answer:
To efficiently keep track of the top K frequent elements by frequency -> Option D
Quick Check:
Heap = Efficient top K tracking [OK]
Hint: Heap keeps top K elements efficiently by frequency [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking heap sorts all elements fully
Confusing heap with simple array storage
Assuming heap removes duplicates
2. Which of the following TypeScript code snippets correctly initializes a min-heap to store pairs of [frequency, element] for the Top K Frequent Elements problem?
easy
A. const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{freq: number, val: number}>({priority: x => x.freq});
TypeScript with modern libraries uses MinPriorityQueue with a priority function for min-heap.
Step 2: Check each option
const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{freq: number, val: number}>({priority: x => x.freq}); correctly creates a min-heap with priority based on frequency. Others are arrays, maps, or sets which do not provide heap behavior.
Final Answer:
const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{freq: number, val: number}>({priority: x => x.freq}); -> Option A
Quick Check:
MinPriorityQueue with priority function = correct heap [OK]
Hint: Use MinPriorityQueue with priority function for min-heap [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using Array instead of heap
Using Map or Set which are not heaps
Missing priority function in heap initialization
3. What will be the output of the following TypeScript code snippet for nums = [1,1,1,2,2,3] and k = 2?
function topKFrequent(nums: number[], k: number): number[] {
const freqMap = new Map();
for (const num of nums) {
freqMap.set(num, (freqMap.get(num) || 0) + 1);
}
const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{val: number, freq: number}>({priority: x => x.freq});
for (const [num, freq] of freqMap.entries()) {
minHeap.enqueue({val: num, freq});
if (minHeap.size() > k) {
minHeap.dequeue();
}
}
const result = [];
while (minHeap.size() > 0) {
result.push(minHeap.dequeue().element.val);
}
return result.reverse();
}
console.log(topKFrequent([1,1,1,2,2,3], 2));
Step 2: Use min-heap to keep top 2 frequent elements
Insert (1,3), (2,2), (3,1). When size > 2, remove smallest freq. So 3 with freq 1 is removed.
Step 3: Extract elements from heap and reverse
Heap contains (1,3) and (2,2). Extracted order reversed gives [1, 2].
Final Answer:
[1, 2] -> Option B
Quick Check:
Top 2 frequent = [1, 2] [OK]
Hint: Keep heap size ≤ k, remove smallest frequency [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not reversing result array
Removing wrong element from heap
Confusing frequency counts
4. Identify the bug in the following TypeScript code for finding top K frequent elements:
function topKFrequent(nums: number[], k: number): number[] {
const freqMap = new Map();
for (const num of nums) {
freqMap.set(num, freqMap.get(num) + 1);
}
const minHeap = new MinPriorityQueue<{val: number, freq: number}>({priority: x => x.freq});
for (const [num, freq] of freqMap.entries()) {
minHeap.enqueue({val: num, freq});
if (minHeap.size() > k) {
minHeap.dequeue();
}
}
const result = [];
while (minHeap.size() > 0) {
result.push(minHeap.dequeue().element.val);
}
return result.reverse();
}
medium
A. Map should be replaced with Set
B. minHeap.dequeue() removes wrong element
C. freqMap.get(num) + 1 causes error when num not in map
D. result.reverse() is unnecessary
Solution
Step 1: Check frequency map update line
freqMap.get(num) returns undefined if num not present, so undefined + 1 causes NaN.
Step 2: Correct way to update frequency
Use freqMap.get(num) || 0 to default to 0 if undefined, then add 1.
Final Answer:
freqMap.get(num) + 1 causes error when num not in map -> Option C
Quick Check:
Undefined + 1 = NaN error [OK]
Hint: Use (freqMap.get(num) || 0) + 1 to avoid undefined [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not handling undefined in map get
Removing wrong element from heap
Thinking reverse is unnecessary
Replacing Map with Set incorrectly
5. Given a large array nums with many elements having the same frequency, how can you modify the heap approach to ensure the Top K Frequent Elements always returns the smallest elements when frequencies tie? Choose the best approach.
hard
A. Use a heap with priority comparing frequency first, then element value to break ties
B. Sort the entire array before building the heap
C. Use a max-heap instead of a min-heap without tie-break logic
D. Ignore tie cases as they do not affect the result
Solution
Step 1: Understand tie frequency problem
When multiple elements share frequency, we want consistent ordering by element value.
Step 2: Modify heap priority to handle ties
Use a comparator that first compares frequency, then element value to break ties, ensuring smallest elements come first.
Step 3: Why other options fail
Sorting entire array is inefficient; max-heap without tie-break can give inconsistent results; ignoring ties causes unpredictable output.
Final Answer:
Use a heap with priority comparing frequency first, then element value to break ties -> Option A
Quick Check:
Priority with tie-break = correct tie handling [OK]
Hint: Add tie-break by element value in heap priority [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Sorting entire array wastes time
Ignoring tie-break leads to wrong output
Using max-heap without tie-break causes inconsistency
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.