What if you could instantly know if a path in a tree adds up to your number without guessing?
Why Path Sum Root to Leaf in Binary Tree in DSA Typescript?
Imagine you have a family tree drawn on paper, and you want to find if there is a path from the oldest ancestor to a youngest family member where the ages add up to a certain number.
Doing this by looking at every possible path manually is tiring and confusing.
Manually checking each path means you have to remember every step and sum along the way.
This is slow and easy to make mistakes, especially if the tree is big.
You might miss some paths or add numbers wrong.
Using a program to check the tree automatically saves time and avoids mistakes.
The program walks down each path, adding numbers as it goes, and tells you if any path matches the target sum.
function checkPathSum(node, target) {
// Manually track sums for each path
// Very complex and error-prone
}function hasPathSum(node, targetSum) {
if (!node) return false;
if (!node.left && !node.right) return node.val === targetSum;
return hasPathSum(node.left, targetSum - node.val) || hasPathSum(node.right, targetSum - node.val);
}This lets you quickly find if any root-to-leaf path adds up to your target, even in big trees.
Checking if a route in a map adds up to a certain distance, or if a decision path in a flowchart meets a target score.
Manual path checking is slow and error-prone.
Automated path sum checking walks the tree efficiently.
This helps find target sums in complex tree structures easily.
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem statement
The problem asks if there is any path from the root node down to any leaf node where the sum of the node values equals the target sum.Step 2: Differentiate from other tree properties
It is not about depth, total nodes, or sum of all nodes, but specifically about a path sum from root to leaf.Final Answer:
If there exists a root-to-leaf path with a sum equal to a given target -> Option BQuick Check:
Path sum means root-to-leaf sum = D [OK]
- Confusing path sum with total tree sum
- Checking any path, not just root-to-leaf
- Ignoring leaf node condition
class TreeNode { val: number; left: TreeNode | null; right: TreeNode | null; }?Solution
Step 1: Check parameter types
The root should be a TreeNode or null (empty tree), and sum should be a number representing the target sum.Step 2: Check return type
The function returns a boolean indicating if such a path exists.Final Answer:
function hasPathSum(root: TreeNode | null, sum: number): boolean -> Option CQuick Check:
Correct types and return boolean = B [OK]
- Swapping parameter types
- Using wrong return type
- Missing null for root parameter
hasPathSum(root, 22) return?5 / \ 4 8 / / \ 11 13 4 / \ 7 2 1
Solution
Step 1: Identify root-to-leaf paths and their sums
Check paths: 5->4->11->7 = 27, 5->4->11->2 = 22, 5->8->13 = 26, 5->8->4->1 = 18.Step 2: Check if any path sum equals 22
Path 5->4->11->2 sums to 22, so function returns true.Final Answer:
true -> Option DQuick Check:
Path sum 22 exists = true [OK]
- Ignoring leaf node condition
- Calculating sum incorrectly
- Confusing partial paths with full root-to-leaf
function hasPathSum(root: TreeNode | null, sum: number): boolean {
if (!root) return false;
if (!root.left && !root.right) return root.val === sum;
return hasPathSum(root.left, sum - root.val) || hasPathSum(root.right, sum - root.val);
}What does the function return if the tree is empty (root = null) and sum is 0?
Solution
Step 1: Analyze base case for empty tree
When root is null, if (!root) returns false immediately.Step 2: Confirm for sum = 0
Empty tree has no root-to-leaf path regardless of target sum, so false is correct.Final Answer:
Returns false for empty tree and sum 0 -> Option AQuick Check:
Null root always returns false [OK]
- Thinking empty tree with sum 0 should return true
- Expecting runtime error without null check
- Confusing empty tree with single-node tree
Solution
Step 1: Understand requirement to collect all matching paths
We need to find all root-to-leaf paths whose sums equal the target, not just check existence.Step 2: Choose traversal and tracking method
DFS (depth-first search) allows tracking the current path and sum, and collecting paths when leaf and sum match.Step 3: Evaluate other options
BFS is less natural for path tracking; queues without paths lose information; returning boolean stops early.Final Answer:
Use DFS to track current path and sum, collect paths when sum matches at leaf -> Option AQuick Check:
DFS with path tracking = A [OK]
- Using BFS without path tracking
- Stopping at first match instead of collecting all
- Ignoring leaf node condition
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
