Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Typescriptprogramming~10 mins

Path Sum Root to Leaf in Binary Tree in DSA Typescript - Interactive Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to check if the current node is null.

DSA Typescript
if (node [1] null) return false;
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A===
B>
C!==
D<
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using '!=' instead of '===' causes wrong logic.
Using '>' or '<' operators for null check.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to check if the current node is a leaf node.

DSA Typescript
if (node.left === null && node.right [1] null) return sum + node.val === targetSum;
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A<
B!=
C>
D===
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using '!=' instead of '===' causes incorrect leaf detection.
Checking only one child for null.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the recursive call to check left subtree.

DSA Typescript
return helper(node.left, sum [1] node.val, targetSum) || helper(node.right, sum + node.val, targetSum);
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A/
B-
C+
D*
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using '-' causes decreasing sum incorrectly.
Using '*' or '/' causes wrong calculations.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to complete the function signature and initial call.

DSA Typescript
function hasPathSum([1]: TreeNode | null, targetSum: number): boolean {
  return helper([2], 0, targetSum);
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Anode
Broot
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'node' in parameter but calling helper with 'root'.
Mismatch between parameter name and argument.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to complete the helper function for path sum check.

DSA Typescript
function helper(node: TreeNode | null, sum: number, targetSum: number): boolean {
  if (node === null) return [1];
  if (node.left === null && node.right === null) return sum + node.val === [2];
  return helper(node.left, sum [3] node.val, targetSum) || helper(node.right, sum + node.val, targetSum);
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Afalse
BtargetSum
C+
Dtrue
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Returning true when node is null causes wrong results.
Comparing sum instead of sum + node.val to targetSum.
Using wrong operator instead of '+' in recursion.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the "Path Sum Root to Leaf" problem ask you to find in a binary tree?
easy
A. The sum of all node values in the binary tree
B. If there exists a root-to-leaf path with a sum equal to a given target
C. The total number of nodes in the binary tree
D. The maximum depth of the binary tree

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem statement

    The problem asks if there is any path from the root node down to any leaf node where the sum of the node values equals the target sum.
  2. Step 2: Differentiate from other tree properties

    It is not about depth, total nodes, or sum of all nodes, but specifically about a path sum from root to leaf.
  3. Final Answer:

    If there exists a root-to-leaf path with a sum equal to a given target -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Path sum means root-to-leaf sum = D [OK]
Hint: Focus on root-to-leaf paths, not entire tree sums [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing path sum with total tree sum
  • Checking any path, not just root-to-leaf
  • Ignoring leaf node condition
2. Which of the following TypeScript function signatures correctly represents a function to check path sum in a binary tree node defined as class TreeNode { val: number; left: TreeNode | null; right: TreeNode | null; }?
easy
A. function hasPathSum(root: number, sum: TreeNode): boolean
B. function hasPathSum(root: TreeNode, sum: string): boolean
C. function hasPathSum(root: TreeNode | null, sum: number): boolean
D. function hasPathSum(root: TreeNode | null): number

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check parameter types

    The root should be a TreeNode or null (empty tree), and sum should be a number representing the target sum.
  2. Step 2: Check return type

    The function returns a boolean indicating if such a path exists.
  3. Final Answer:

    function hasPathSum(root: TreeNode | null, sum: number): boolean -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct types and return boolean = B [OK]
Hint: Root can be null; sum is number; return boolean [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Swapping parameter types
  • Using wrong return type
  • Missing null for root parameter
3. Given the following binary tree and target sum = 22, what will the function hasPathSum(root, 22) return?

    5
   / \
  4   8
 /   / \
11  13  4
/  \      
7    2     1
medium
A. null
B. false
C. SyntaxError
D. true

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify root-to-leaf paths and their sums

    Check paths: 5->4->11->7 = 27, 5->4->11->2 = 22, 5->8->13 = 26, 5->8->4->1 = 18.
  2. Step 2: Check if any path sum equals 22

    Path 5->4->11->2 sums to 22, so function returns true.
  3. Final Answer:

    true -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Path sum 22 exists = true [OK]
Hint: Sum each root-to-leaf path, check for target [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring leaf node condition
  • Calculating sum incorrectly
  • Confusing partial paths with full root-to-leaf
4. Consider this TypeScript code snippet for checking path sum:

function hasPathSum(root: TreeNode | null, sum: number): boolean {
  if (!root) return false;
  if (!root.left && !root.right) return root.val === sum;
  return hasPathSum(root.left, sum - root.val) || hasPathSum(root.right, sum - root.val);
}

What does the function return if the tree is empty (root = null) and sum is 0?
medium
A. Returns false for empty tree and sum 0
B. Causes infinite recursion
C. Throws runtime error due to null access
D. Returns true incorrectly for non-empty tree

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze base case for empty tree

    When root is null, if (!root) returns false immediately.
  2. Step 2: Confirm for sum = 0

    Empty tree has no root-to-leaf path regardless of target sum, so false is correct.
  3. Final Answer:

    Returns false for empty tree and sum 0 -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Null root always returns false [OK]
Hint: Empty tree always returns false [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking empty tree with sum 0 should return true
  • Expecting runtime error without null check
  • Confusing empty tree with single-node tree
5. You want to modify the path sum function to return all root-to-leaf paths where the sum equals the target. Which approach best solves this problem?
hard
A. Use DFS to track current path and sum, collect paths when sum matches at leaf
B. Use BFS and stop at first matching path
C. Use a queue to store sums only, ignoring paths
D. Return true or false immediately when sum matches any node

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand requirement to collect all matching paths

    We need to find all root-to-leaf paths whose sums equal the target, not just check existence.
  2. Step 2: Choose traversal and tracking method

    DFS (depth-first search) allows tracking the current path and sum, and collecting paths when leaf and sum match.
  3. Step 3: Evaluate other options

    BFS is less natural for path tracking; queues without paths lose information; returning boolean stops early.
  4. Final Answer:

    Use DFS to track current path and sum, collect paths when sum matches at leaf -> Option A
  5. Quick Check:

    DFS with path tracking = A [OK]
Hint: Track path and sum with DFS to collect all matching paths [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using BFS without path tracking
  • Stopping at first match instead of collecting all
  • Ignoring leaf node condition
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard