Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Typescriptprogramming~20 mins

Set Matrix Zeroes In Place in DSA Typescript - Practice Problems & Challenges

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Challenge - 5 Problems
🎖️
Matrix Zeroes Master
Get all challenges correct to earn this badge!
Test your skills under time pressure!
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
What is the output of the matrix after running this code?
Consider the following TypeScript function that sets matrix zeroes in place. What will be the state of the matrix after calling setZeroes(matrix)?
DSA Typescript
function setZeroes(matrix: number[][]): void {
  const rows = matrix.length;
  const cols = matrix[0].length;
  const rowZero = new Array(rows).fill(false);
  const colZero = new Array(cols).fill(false);

  for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) {
      if (matrix[i][j] === 0) {
        rowZero[i] = true;
        colZero[j] = true;
      }
    }
  }

  for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) {
      if (rowZero[i] || colZero[j]) {
        matrix[i][j] = 0;
      }
    }
  }
}

const matrix = [
  [1, 2, 3],
  [4, 0, 6],
  [7, 8, 9]
];
setZeroes(matrix);
console.log(matrix);
A[[1,2,3],[4,0,6],[7,8,9]]
B[[1,0,3],[0,0,0],[0,0,0]]
C[[0,0,0],[0,0,0],[0,0,0]]
D[[1,0,3],[0,0,0],[7,0,9]]
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Track which rows and columns contain zeroes first, then update the matrix.
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
What is the output of this optimized in-place zeroing code?
Given this TypeScript function that uses the first row and column as markers, what will be the matrix after calling setZeroes(matrix)?
DSA Typescript
function setZeroes(matrix: number[][]): void {
  const rows = matrix.length;
  const cols = matrix[0].length;
  let firstRowZero = false;
  let firstColZero = false;

  for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
    if (matrix[i][0] === 0) firstColZero = true;
  }
  for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) {
    if (matrix[0][j] === 0) firstRowZero = true;
  }

  for (let i = 1; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 1; j < cols; j++) {
      if (matrix[i][j] === 0) {
        matrix[i][0] = 0;
        matrix[0][j] = 0;
      }
    }
  }

  for (let i = 1; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 1; j < cols; j++) {
      if (matrix[i][0] === 0 || matrix[0][j] === 0) {
        matrix[i][j] = 0;
      }
    }
  }

  if (firstColZero) {
    for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) matrix[i][0] = 0;
  }
  if (firstRowZero) {
    for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) matrix[0][j] = 0;
  }
}

const matrix = [
  [1, 2, 0],
  [4, 5, 6],
  [7, 0, 9]
];
setZeroes(matrix);
console.log(matrix);
A[[0,0,0],[4,0,0],[0,0,0]]
B[[1,2,0],[4,0,0],[7,0,9]]
C[[0,0,0],[4,5,0],[7,0,9]]
D[[0,0,0],[4,0,0],[7,0,0]]
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Remember to zero the first row and column last if needed.
🔧 Debug
advanced
2:00remaining
What error does this code produce?
This TypeScript code attempts to set matrix zeroes in place but has a bug. What error will it raise when run?
DSA Typescript
function setZeroes(matrix: number[][]): void {
  const rows = matrix.length;
  const cols = matrix[0].length;
  for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) {
      if (matrix[i][j] === 0) {
        for (let k = 0; k < cols; k++) {
          matrix[i][k] = 0;
        }
        for (let k = 0; k < rows; k++) {
          matrix[k][j] = 0;
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

const matrix = [
  [1, 2, 3],
  [4, 0, 6],
  [7, 8, 9]
];
setZeroes(matrix);
ASyntaxError: Unexpected token
BTypeError: Cannot read property '0' of undefined
CNo error, matrix is modified correctly
DRangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Check the loop boundary conditions carefully.
🚀 Application
advanced
2:00remaining
How many elements are zero after running this code?
Given the following matrix and the setZeroes function, how many elements in the matrix will be zero after the function runs?
DSA Typescript
function setZeroes(matrix: number[][]): void {
  const rows = matrix.length;
  const cols = matrix[0].length;
  let firstRowZero = false;
  let firstColZero = false;

  for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
    if (matrix[i][0] === 0) firstColZero = true;
  }
  for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) {
    if (matrix[0][j] === 0) firstRowZero = true;
  }

  for (let i = 1; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 1; j < cols; j++) {
      if (matrix[i][j] === 0) {
        matrix[i][0] = 0;
        matrix[0][j] = 0;
      }
    }
  }

  for (let i = 1; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 1; j < cols; j++) {
      if (matrix[i][0] === 0 || matrix[0][j] === 0) {
        matrix[i][j] = 0;
      }
    }
  }

  if (firstColZero) {
    for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) matrix[i][0] = 0;
  }
  if (firstRowZero) {
    for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) matrix[0][j] = 0;
  }
}

const matrix = [
  [1, 2, 3, 4],
  [5, 0, 7, 8],
  [0, 10, 11, 12],
  [13, 14, 15, 0]
];
setZeroes(matrix);
A7
B10
C8
D9
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Count zeroes after marking rows and columns, including first row and column.
🧠 Conceptual
expert
2:00remaining
Why does using the first row and column as markers save space?
In the in-place Set Matrix Zeroes algorithm, why do we use the first row and first column of the matrix as markers instead of separate arrays?
ABecause it avoids extra space usage by reusing existing matrix space for markers
BBecause it makes the code run faster by avoiding loops
CBecause it prevents the matrix from being modified accidentally
DBecause it allows the matrix to be sorted after zeroing
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Think about space complexity and memory usage.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main goal of the Set Matrix Zeroes In Place problem?
easy
A. Modify the matrix so that if an element is 0, its entire row and column become 0 without using extra space.
B. Find the number of zero elements in the matrix.
C. Sort the matrix rows in ascending order.
D. Replace all non-zero elements with 1.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem requirement

    The problem requires changing the matrix so that any row or column containing a zero is set entirely to zero.
  2. Step 2: Note the in-place constraint

    This must be done without using extra space for another matrix or large data structures.
  3. Final Answer:

    Modify the matrix so that if an element is 0, its entire row and column become 0 without using extra space. -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    In-place zeroing of rows and columns = Modify the matrix so that if an element is 0, its entire row and column become 0 without using extra space. [OK]
Hint: Remember: zero means zero entire row and column [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using extra space like another matrix
  • Only zeroing rows or only columns
  • Not handling the in-place requirement
2. Which of the following TypeScript code snippets correctly declares a 2D matrix named matrix of numbers?
easy
A. const matrix: number[][] = [[1, 0], [3, 4]];
B. const matrix: number[] = [[1, 0], [3, 4]];
C. const matrix: number = [[1, 0], [3, 4]];
D. const matrix: any = 1, 0, 3, 4;

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand TypeScript 2D array syntax

    A 2D array of numbers is declared as number[][].
  2. Step 2: Check each option

    const matrix: number[][] = [[1, 0], [3, 4]]; uses number[][] and initializes correctly. Options B and C use incorrect types. const matrix: any = 1, 0, 3, 4; is invalid syntax.
  3. Final Answer:

    const matrix: number[][] = [[1, 0], [3, 4]]; -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    2D array type is number[][] = const matrix: number[][] = [[1, 0], [3, 4]]; [OK]
Hint: Use number[][] for 2D numeric arrays in TypeScript [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using number[] for 2D arrays
  • Assigning arrays to number type
  • Incorrect syntax for array declaration
3. Given the following TypeScript code, what will be the state of matrix after calling setZeroes(matrix)?
function setZeroes(matrix: number[][]): void {
  const rows = matrix.length;
  const cols = matrix[0].length;
  const rowZero = new Array(rows).fill(false);
  const colZero = new Array(cols).fill(false);

  for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) {
      if (matrix[i][j] === 0) {
        rowZero[i] = true;
        colZero[j] = true;
      }
    }
  }

  for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) {
      if (rowZero[i] || colZero[j]) {
        matrix[i][j] = 0;
      }
    }
  }
}

const matrix = [
  [1, 2, 3],
  [4, 0, 6],
  [7, 8, 9]
];
setZeroes(matrix);
console.log(matrix);
medium
A. [[1, 2, 3], [0, 0, 0], [7, 8, 9]]
B. [[1, 2, 3], [4, 0, 6], [7, 8, 9]]
C. [[1, 0, 3], [0, 0, 0], [7, 0, 9]]
D. [[1, 0, 3], [4, 0, 6], [7, 0, 9]]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify zero positions

    Zero found at matrix[1][1]. So row 1 and column 1 must be zeroed.
  2. Step 2: Apply zeroing to rows and columns

    Row 1 becomes [0,0,0]. Column 1 elements at rows 0 and 2 become 0. Resulting matrix is [[1,0,3],[0,0,0],[7,0,9]].
  3. Final Answer:

    [[1, 0, 3], [0, 0, 0], [7, 0, 9]] -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Zero at (1,1) zeroes row 1 and column 1 = [[1, 0, 3], [0, 0, 0], [7, 0, 9]] [OK]
Hint: Mark rows and columns first, then zero them [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Zeroing only rows or only columns
  • Not zeroing all affected cells
  • Modifying matrix during first scan
4. The following code attempts to set matrix zeroes in place but has a bug. What is the bug?
function setZeroes(matrix: number[][]): void {
  const rows = matrix.length;
  const cols = matrix[0].length;

  for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
    for (let j = 0; j < cols; j++) {
      if (matrix[i][j] === 0) {
        for (let k = 0; k < cols; k++) {
          matrix[i][k] = 0;
        }
        for (let k = 0; k < rows; k++) {
          matrix[k][j] = 0;
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
medium
A. It only zeros the first row and column.
B. It modifies the matrix while scanning, causing incorrect zeroing.
C. It does not zero the columns correctly.
D. It uses extra space which is not allowed.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze matrix modification during iteration

    The code sets zeros immediately when found, changing matrix values during scanning.
  2. Step 2: Understand impact of immediate modification

    This causes new zeros to be detected incorrectly, leading to extra rows and columns zeroed.
  3. Final Answer:

    It modifies the matrix while scanning, causing incorrect zeroing. -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Immediate zeroing during scan causes errors = It modifies the matrix while scanning, causing incorrect zeroing. [OK]
Hint: Mark first, then zero to avoid premature changes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Zeroing matrix cells while scanning
  • Not using markers to track zero rows/columns
  • Assuming immediate zeroing is safe
5. You want to optimize the Set Matrix Zeroes In Place solution to use O(1) extra space by using the first row and first column as markers. Given the matrix:
[
  [1, 2, 0],
  [4, 0, 6],
  [7, 8, 9]
]
What will be the matrix after applying this optimized approach?
hard
A. [[1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0], [7, 0, 9]]
B. [[1, 2, 0], [4, 0, 6], [7, 8, 9]]
C. [[0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0], [7, 0, 9]]
D. [[0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0], [7, 0, 0]]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Use first row and column as markers

    Zeros at (0,2) and (1,1) mark first row and column accordingly.
  2. Step 2: Zero rows and columns based on markers

    Row 0 and 1 become all zeros. Column 1 and 2 become zeros in all rows. Final matrix is [[0,0,0],[0,0,0],[7,0,0]].
  3. Final Answer:

    [[0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0], [7, 0, 0]] -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    First row/column markers zero rows/columns = [[0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0], [7, 0, 0]] [OK]
Hint: Use first row/column as flags to save space [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not handling first row and column separately
  • Overwriting markers too early
  • Missing zeros in last row or column
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard