What is the main idea behind removing the nth node from the end of a linked list?
Use two pointers spaced n nodes apart. Move both until the first reaches the end. The second pointer will then be just before the node to remove.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why do we use a dummy node at the start of the linked list in this problem?
A dummy node helps handle edge cases like removing the first node easily by providing a fixed node before the head.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
In the two-pointer approach, what happens if the first pointer moves n steps ahead and reaches null immediately?
It means n equals the length of the list, so the node to remove is the head node.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What is the time complexity of removing the nth node from the end of a linked list using the two-pointer method?
O(L), where L is the length of the linked list, because we traverse the list at most once.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
How do you update the links to remove the nth node from the end once the second pointer is just before it?
Set second.next = second.next.next to skip the nth node and remove it from the list.
Click to reveal answer
What does the first pointer do in the two-pointer approach to remove the nth node from the end?
AMoves to the end immediately
BMoves n steps ahead to create a gap
CStays at the head
DMoves backwards
✗ Incorrect
The first pointer moves n steps ahead to create a gap between the two pointers.
Why is a dummy node used before the head in this problem?
ATo point to the last node
BTo store the length of the list
CTo simplify removing the head node
DTo reverse the list
✗ Incorrect
A dummy node simplifies edge cases like removing the head node by providing a stable node before the head.
If n equals the length of the list, which node is removed?
AThe head node
BThe last node
CThe middle node
DNo node is removed
✗ Incorrect
If n equals the list length, the node to remove is the head node.
What is the time complexity of the two-pointer solution?
AO(1)
BO(n^2)
CO(log n)
DO(n)
✗ Incorrect
The solution traverses the list at most once, so time complexity is O(n).
How do you remove the nth node once the second pointer is just before it?
ASet second.next to second.next.next
BSwap values with next node
CMove second pointer forward
DSet second.next to null
✗ Incorrect
Setting second.next to second.next.next skips the nth node, effectively removing it.
Explain step-by-step how to remove the nth node from the end of a singly linked list using two pointers.
Think about creating a gap and moving pointers together.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe why a dummy node is helpful in removing the nth node from the end of a linked list.
Consider what happens if the head node needs to be removed.
You got /3 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the problem Remove Nth Node from End of List ask you to do?
easy
A. Find the value of the nth node from the start
B. Add a new node at the nth position from the start
C. Reverse the linked list up to the nth node
D. Delete the node that is the nth from the end in a linked list
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem statement
The problem requires removing the node that is nth from the end of a singly linked list.
Step 2: Clarify the task
We do not add or reverse nodes; we specifically remove the nth node counting from the list's end.
Final Answer:
Delete the node that is the nth from the end in a linked list -> Option D
Quick Check:
Remove nth from end = Delete nth from end [OK]
Hint: Focus on 'from end' meaning count backwards [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing nth from end with nth from start
Thinking the problem is about reversing the list
Assuming insertion instead of deletion
2. Which of the following TypeScript function signatures correctly represents a function to remove the nth node from the end of a singly linked list?
easy
A. function removeNthFromEnd(head: ListNode, n: string): ListNode
B. function removeNthFromEnd(head: number[], n: number): number[]
C. function removeNthFromEnd(head: ListNode | null, n: number): ListNode | null
D. function removeNthFromEnd(n: number, head: ListNode): ListNode
Solution
Step 1: Check parameter types and order
The function should take the head of a linked list (ListNode or null) and a number n, returning the possibly updated head.
Step 2: Validate correct types and order
function removeNthFromEnd(head: ListNode | null, n: number): ListNode | null matches this: head is ListNode|null, n is number, return type is ListNode|null.
Final Answer:
function removeNthFromEnd(head: ListNode | null, n: number): ListNode | null -> Option C
Quick Check:
Correct signature uses ListNode and number types [OK]
Hint: Head first, then n; use ListNode type [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Swapping parameter order
Using array type instead of ListNode
Using wrong type for n (string instead of number)
3. What is the output linked list after removing the 2nd node from the end in the list 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null?
medium
A. 1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
B. 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 5 -> null
C. 1 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
D. 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
Solution
Step 1: Identify the 2nd node from the end
Counting from the end: 5 is 1st, 4 is 2nd node from the end.
Step 2: Remove the 4th node
Removing node with value 4 results in list: 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 5 -> null.
Final Answer:
1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 5 -> null -> Option B
Quick Check:
2nd from end is 4, removed list matches 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 5 -> null [OK]
Hint: Count from end, remove that node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Removing wrong node counting from start
Removing node 3 instead of 4
Confusing 2nd from end with 2nd from start
4. Given this TypeScript code snippet to remove the nth node from end, what is the bug?
function removeNthFromEnd(head: ListNode | null, n: number): ListNode | null {
let fast = head;
let slow = head;
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
fast = fast.next;
}
while (fast.next !== null) {
fast = fast.next;
slow = slow.next;
}
slow.next = slow.next.next;
return head;
}
medium
A. It does not handle the case when n equals the length of the list
B. The loop runs one time too many causing runtime error
C. The slow pointer moves too fast and skips nodes
D. It returns the wrong head node
Solution
Step 1: Analyze fast pointer movement
Fast pointer moves n steps ahead. If n equals list length, fast becomes null.
Step 2: Check while loop condition
Code uses fast.next, but if fast is null, accessing fast.next causes error or skips removing head.
Step 3: Identify missing edge case handling
Code does not handle removing the first node when n equals list length.
Final Answer:
It does not handle the case when n equals the length of the list -> Option A
Quick Check:
Edge case n = list length missing [OK]
Hint: Check if fast pointer is null after initial moves [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring edge case when removing head node
Assuming fast.next always exists
Not returning updated head when head is removed
5. You have a linked list 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null. You remove the 5th node from the end twice in a row. What is the final linked list?
hard
A. 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
B. 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
C. 3 -> 4 -> null
D. 4 -> 5 -> null
Solution
Step 1: First removal of 5th node from end
List length 5, 5th from end is head (1). After removal: 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null.
Step 2: Second removal of 5th node from end
New length 4, n=5 > 4 so no 5th node exists; list unchanged: 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null.
Final Answer:
2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null -> Option A
Quick Check:
Removing 5th from end twice removes head once [OK]
Hint: Removing nth from end twice may remove head once only [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing nth from end with nth from start
Thinking the problem is about reversing the list
Assuming insertion instead of deletion
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.