Next Permutation of Array in DSA Typescript - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Next Permutation of Array

O(n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how the time needed to find the next permutation changes as the array size grows.

Specifically, how many steps does the algorithm take when the array gets bigger?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

function nextPermutation(nums: number[]): void {
  let i = nums.length - 2;
  while (i >= 0 && nums[i] >= nums[i + 1]) i--;
  if (i >= 0) {
    let j = nums.length - 1;
    while (nums[j] <= nums[i]) j--;
    [nums[i], nums[j]] = [nums[j], nums[i]];
  }
  reverse(nums, i + 1);
}

function reverse(nums: number[], start: number): void {
  let left = start, right = nums.length - 1;
  while (left < right) {
    [nums[left], nums[right]] = [nums[right], nums[left]];
    left++;
    right--;
  }
}
    

This code finds the next lexicographical permutation of the array in place.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: Three loops: one to find the pivot, one to find the swap partner, and one to reverse part of the array.
• How many times: Each loop can run up to n times, where n is the array length.

How Execution Grows With Input

As the array size grows, each loop may scan a portion of the array once.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	Up to about 30 steps (3 loops x 10 steps each)
100	Up to about 300 steps
1000	Up to about 3000 steps

Pattern observation: The total steps grow roughly in a straight line with the input size.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n)

This means the time to find the next permutation grows linearly with the array size.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "The algorithm must check all permutations, so it takes factorial time."

[OK] Correct: The algorithm smartly finds the next permutation by scanning the array only a few times, not generating all permutations.

Interview Connect

Understanding this linear time approach shows you can handle array manipulation efficiently, a skill often valued in coding challenges.

Self-Check

"What if we used a sorting step instead of reversing the suffix? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What does the next permutation of an array represent?

easy

A. The smallest element moved to the front

B. The array sorted in ascending order

C. The array reversed

D. The next lexicographically greater arrangement of the array elements

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand permutation order

   Permutations can be ordered lexicographically like words in a dictionary.

2. Step 2: Define next permutation

   The next permutation is the immediate next arrangement that is greater than the current one.

3. Final Answer:

   The next lexicographically greater arrangement of the array elements -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Next permutation means next bigger order [OK]

Hint: Next permutation means next bigger order of elements [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking next permutation is just sorting ascending
• Confusing next permutation with reversing the array
• Assuming next permutation always moves smallest element front

2. Which of the following TypeScript function signatures correctly represents a function to compute the next permutation of an array of numbers?

easy

A. function nextPermutation(nums: number[]): void

B. function nextPermutation(nums: string): string

C. function nextPermutation(nums: number): number[]

D. function nextPermutation(nums: any): any[]

Solution

1. Step 1: Check parameter type

   The input should be an array of numbers, so nums: number[] is correct.

2. Step 2: Check return type

   The function modifies the array in place and returns nothing, so void is correct.

3. Final Answer:

   function nextPermutation(nums: number[]): void -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Input array, no return needed [OK]

Hint: Input array of numbers, modify in place, return void [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using string type instead of number array
• Returning a new array instead of modifying in place
• Using incorrect parameter types

3. What is the output array after applying the next permutation algorithm on [1, 3, 2]?

medium

A. [2, 1, 3]

B. [1, 2, 3]

C. [3, 1, 2]

D. [1, 3, 2]

Solution

1. Step 1: Find the pivot index i

   Start from i = nums.length - 2 = 1. nums[1] = 3 >= nums[2] = 2, so i-- to 0. nums[0] = 1 < nums[1] = 3, pivot i = 0.

2. Step 2: Find successor j

   From j = nums.length - 1 = 2, find rightmost j > i with nums[j] > nums[i]. j=2: 2 > 1, yes.

3. Step 3: Swap pivot and successor

   Swap nums[0] and nums[2]: [2, 3, 1].

4. Step 4: Reverse suffix after i

   Reverse indices 1 to 2: [3, 1] becomes [1, 3]. Final: [2, 1, 3].

5. Final Answer:

   [2, 1, 3] -> Option A

6. Quick Check:

   Next permutation of [1,3,2] is [2,1,3] [OK]

Hint: Find pivot, swap with next bigger, reverse suffix [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Swapping wrong elements
• Not reversing suffix after swap
• Confusing next permutation with sorting

4. Given this TypeScript code snippet, what is the error?

function nextPermutation(nums: number[]): void {
  let i = nums.length - 2;
  while (i >= 0 && nums[i] >= nums[i + 1]) {
    i--;
  }
  if (i >= 0) {
    let j = nums.length - 1;
    while (nums[j] <= nums[i]) {
      j--;
    }
    [nums[i], nums[j]] = [nums[j], nums[i]];
  }
  nums.reverse();
}

medium

A. The while loops have wrong conditions

B. The entire array is reversed instead of just the suffix

C. The swap syntax is incorrect

D. The function returns a value but should be void

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze reversal step

   The code reverses the entire array with nums.reverse() instead of just the suffix after index i+1.

2. Step 2: Understand correct reversal

   Only the part of the array after the pivot index should be reversed to get the next permutation.

3. Final Answer:

   The entire array is reversed instead of just the suffix -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Reverse suffix, not whole array [OK]

Hint: Reverse only suffix after pivot, not whole array [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Reversing entire array instead of suffix
• Incorrect swap syntax
• Wrong loop conditions causing errors

5. You have an array [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]. After applying the next permutation algorithm, what will be the resulting array?

hard

A. [5, 4, 3, 1, 2]

B. [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]

C. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

D. [1, 5, 4, 3, 2]

Solution

1. Step 1: Check if array is highest permutation

   The array is in descending order, which is the highest permutation.

2. Step 2: Apply next permutation rule for highest permutation

   If no next bigger permutation exists, the array is reversed to the lowest permutation.

3. Final Answer:

   [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Descending array next permutation is ascending [OK]

Hint: Descending array next permutation is ascending order [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Returning same array instead of reversed
• Trying to swap elements incorrectly
• Confusing next permutation with partial sorting