What is the intersection point of two linked lists?
It is the node where two linked lists merge and share the same next nodes onward.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why do two linked lists intersect at only one point?
Because after the intersection node, both lists share the same nodes, so they cannot split again.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is a simple approach to find the intersection point of two linked lists?
Use two pointers starting at each list head. Move them forward. When one reaches the end, switch it to the other list's head. They meet at the intersection or null.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the two-pointer method to find the intersection point?
O(m + n), where m and n are the lengths of the two linked lists.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What happens if two linked lists do not intersect?
The two pointers will both reach null after traversing both lists, and no intersection node is found.
Click to reveal answer
What does the intersection point of two linked lists represent?
AA node where both lists share the same next nodes
BThe first node of the longer list
CThe last node of the shorter list
DA node unique to each list
✗ Incorrect
The intersection point is where both lists merge and share the same nodes onward.
Which method can find the intersection point without extra space?
AUsing a hash set to store visited nodes
BSorting both lists
CUsing two pointers switching lists when reaching the end
DReversing both lists
✗ Incorrect
The two-pointer method uses no extra space and finds the intersection by switching heads.
If two linked lists do not intersect, what will the two-pointer method return?
AThe head of the first list
Bnull
CThe head of the second list
DThe last node of the longer list
✗ Incorrect
If no intersection exists, both pointers reach null after traversing both lists.
What is the time complexity of finding the intersection point using the two-pointer approach?
AO(n)
BO(m * n)
CO(m)
DO(m + n)
✗ Incorrect
The two-pointer method traverses both lists at most twice, so O(m + n).
Why do we switch pointers to the other list's head in the two-pointer method?
ATo align the pointers so they traverse equal lengths
BTo reverse the lists
CTo delete nodes
DTo sort the lists
✗ Incorrect
Switching pointers aligns their remaining lengths so they meet at the intersection.
Explain how the two-pointer method finds the intersection point of two linked lists.
Think about how switching heads helps pointers align.
You got /4 concepts.
Describe what the intersection point means in the context of two linked lists and why it can only be one node.
Imagine two roads joining into one.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the "Intersection Point of Two Linked Lists" problem ask you to find?
easy
A. The node where two linked lists merge or intersect
B. The sum of all nodes in both linked lists
C. The length of the longer linked list
D. The first node of the longer linked list
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem goal
The problem asks to find the node where two linked lists join or share the same reference, not just the value.
Step 2: Clarify what intersection means
Intersection means the exact same node object, not just nodes with equal values.
Final Answer:
The node where two linked lists merge or intersect -> Option A
Quick Check:
Intersection point = node shared by both lists [OK]
Hint: Look for the shared node reference, not just values [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing intersection with nodes having same values
Thinking intersection means equal length lists
Looking for sum or length instead of node
2. Which TypeScript syntax correctly declares a singly linked list node class for this problem?
easy
A. type ListNode = { val: number; next: ListNode | undefined }
B. function ListNode(val) { this.val = val; this.next = null; }
C. interface ListNode { val: number; next: ListNode; }
Step 1: Check for class declaration with constructor
class ListNode { val: number; next: ListNode | null; constructor(val: number) { this.val = val; this.next = null; } } correctly defines a class with a constructor initializing val and next properties.
Step 2: Verify type safety and nullability
class ListNode { val: number; next: ListNode | null; constructor(val: number) { this.val = val; this.next = null; } } uses 'next: ListNode | null' which is correct for linked list end.
Proper class with constructor and nullable next [OK]
Hint: Use class with constructor and nullable next for nodes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using interface without constructor
Missing null for next pointer
Using function syntax without types
3. Given the following TypeScript code, what will be the output printed?
class ListNode {
val: number;
next: ListNode | null;
constructor(val: number) {
this.val = val;
this.next = null;
}
}
function getIntersectionNode(headA: ListNode | null, headB: ListNode | null): ListNode | null {
let pA = headA;
let pB = headB;
while (pA !== pB) {
pA = pA ? pA.next : headB;
pB = pB ? pB.next : headA;
}
return pA;
}
// Create nodes
const common = new ListNode(8);
common.next = new ListNode(10);
const listA = new ListNode(3);
listA.next = new ListNode(7);
listA.next.next = common;
const listB = new ListNode(99);
listB.next = common;
const intersection = getIntersectionNode(listA, listB);
console.log(intersection ? intersection.val : null);
medium
A. 7
B. 10
C. 8
D. null
Solution
Step 1: Trace the linked lists and intersection node
List A: 3 -> 7 -> 8 -> 10; List B: 99 -> 8 -> 10; common intersection starts at node with value 8.
Step 2: Understand the two-pointer approach
Pointers pA and pB traverse each list; when one reaches end, it switches to the other list's head. They meet at intersection node 8.
Final Answer:
8 -> Option C
Quick Check:
Intersection node value = 8 [OK]
Hint: Two pointers meet at intersection or null if none [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Returning node value 7 or 10 instead of 8
Confusing node values with references
Not switching pointers to other list head
4. Identify the bug in this TypeScript function to find the intersection point of two linked lists:
function getIntersectionNode(headA: ListNode | null, headB: ListNode | null): ListNode | null {
let pA = headA;
let pB = headB;
while (pA !== pB) {
pA = pA.next;
pB = pB.next;
if (!pA && !pB) return null;
}
return pA;
}
medium
A. Pointers do not switch to the other list's head after reaching null
B. The function returns null too early when both pointers are null
C. The while loop condition should be pA == pB instead of !==
D. The function does not handle empty lists
Solution
Step 1: Analyze pointer movement in the loop
Both pointers move forward but do not switch to the other list's head when reaching null, so they may never meet.
Step 2: Understand the standard approach
To find intersection, pointers must switch to the other list's head after reaching null to align lengths.
Final Answer:
Pointers do not switch to the other list's head after reaching null -> Option A
Quick Check:
Switch pointers to other list head to find intersection [OK]
Hint: Switch pointers to other list head on null to align [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not switching pointers causes infinite loop or wrong result
Returning null too early without full traversal
Incorrect loop condition
5. You have two singly linked lists that intersect at some node. List A has length 7, List B has length 5, and they share the last 3 nodes. Which approach correctly finds the intersection point efficiently?
hard
A. Traverse both lists fully and compare node values at each step
B. Calculate lengths, advance longer list by difference, then move both pointers together
C. Reverse both lists and compare from the start
D. Use a hash set to store all nodes of the shorter list and check nodes of the longer list
Solution
Step 1: Calculate lengths and difference
List A length = 7, List B length = 5, difference = 2.
Step 2: Advance longer list pointer by difference
Move pointer in List A forward by 2 nodes to align with List B pointer.
Step 3: Move both pointers together to find intersection
Advance both pointers step-by-step until they meet at the intersection node.
Final Answer:
Calculate lengths, advance longer list by difference, then move both pointers together -> Option B
Quick Check:
Align pointers by length difference to find intersection [OK]
Hint: Advance longer list by length difference before simultaneous traversal [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Comparing node values instead of references
Reversing lists wastes time and breaks structure
Using hash set wastes extra space unnecessarily
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.