What if you could remove any link from a chain without breaking it or guessing where to cut?
Why Delete Node at Specific Position in DSA Typescript?
Imagine you have a long paper chain made of connected rings. You want to remove the 5th ring from the chain, but you only have scissors and no way to easily find and cut that exact ring without breaking the whole chain.
Manually counting and cutting the right ring is slow and risky. You might cut the wrong ring or break the chain accidentally. It's hard to keep track of positions without a clear method.
Using a method to delete a node at a specific position in a linked list lets you find and remove the exact ring safely and quickly. It keeps the chain connected and intact without guesswork.
let current = head; let count = 1; while (count < position - 1 && current.next) { current = current.next; count++; } current.next = current.next.next;
function deleteAtPosition(head: Node | null, position: number): Node | null {
if (!head) return null;
if (position === 1) return head.next;
let current = head;
for (let i = 1; i < position - 1 && current.next; i++) {
current = current.next;
}
if (current.next) current.next = current.next.next;
return head;
}This lets you quickly and safely remove any item from a chain of connected items without breaking the rest.
Think of a playlist of songs where you want to remove the 3rd song without disturbing the order of others. This method helps you do that smoothly.
Manual removal is slow and error-prone.
Deleting at a specific position keeps the structure intact.
It enables precise and safe removal from linked sequences.
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand node deletion in linked list
Deleting a node means removing it and connecting the previous node to the next node to keep the list intact.Step 2: Apply to specific position
At a specific position, we find the node before it and change its next pointer to skip the node to delete.Final Answer:
Removing the node located at that position and linking its previous node to the next node -> Option AQuick Check:
Delete node = remove and link neighbors [OK]
- Thinking deletion adds a node
- Confusing deletion with swapping nodes
- Ignoring the need to link previous and next nodes
pos in a singly linked list starting with head?Solution
Step 1: Handle deletion at head (position 0)
If position is 0, simply move head to next node to delete the first node.Step 2: Traverse to node before position
Loop from 0 to pos-1 to reach node before the one to delete, then link its next to next.next.Final Answer:
if (pos === 0) head = head.next; else { let temp = head; for (let i = 0; i < pos - 1; i++) temp = temp.next; temp.next = temp.next.next; } -> Option AQuick Check:
Loop to pos-1, then skip node [OK]
- Looping to pos instead of pos-1
- Not handling deletion at head correctly
- Accessing temp.next.next when temp.next is null
let head = { val: 10, next: { val: 20, next: { val: 30, next: { val: 40, next: { val: 50, next: null } } } } };
let pos = 2;
if (pos === 0) head = head.next;
else {
let temp = head;
for (let i = 0; i < pos - 1; i++) temp = temp.next;
temp.next = temp.next.next;
}Solution
Step 1: Identify node at position 2
Position 2 node has value 30 (0-based indexing: 10 at 0, 20 at 1, 30 at 2).Step 2: Delete node at position 2
Traverse to node at position 1 (value 20), then set its next to node at position 3 (value 40), skipping 30.Final Answer:
10 -> 20 -> 40 -> 50 -> null -> Option CQuick Check:
Node 30 removed, neighbors linked [OK]
- Deleting wrong node due to off-by-one error
- Not updating links properly
- Confusing position indexing
pos in a singly linked list but causes a runtime error. What is the error?
function deleteNode(head: Node | null, pos: number): Node | null {
if (pos === 0) return head.next;
let temp = head;
for (let i = 0; i < pos; i++) {
temp = temp.next!;
}
temp.next = temp.next!.next;
return head;
}Solution
Step 1: Analyze loop traversal
The loop runs from 0 to pos, moving temp forward pos times, which can make temp null if pos >= list length.Step 2: Identify null access
After loop, temp may be null, so accessing temp.next causes runtime error.Final Answer:
Accessing temp.next when temp is null causes runtime error -> Option BQuick Check:
Loop overshoots, temp becomes null, then temp.next fails [OK]
- Looping too far causing null pointer
- Not checking for empty list
- Misunderstanding return value after deletion
Song1 -> Song2 -> Song3 -> Song4 -> Song5 -> null. You want to delete the 4th song (position 3). After deletion, you want to insert a new song Song6 at the same position. Which sequence of operations correctly achieves this?Solution
Step 1: Delete node at position 3
Remove the node at position 3 (Song4) by linking node at position 2 to node at position 4.Step 2: Insert new node at position 3
Traverse to position 2, then insert new node after it to place Song6 at position 3.Final Answer:
Delete node at position 3, then traverse to position 2 and insert new node after it -> Option DQuick Check:
Delete at pos 3, insert after pos 2 = new pos 3 [OK]
- Inserting at wrong position after deletion
- Deleting wrong node position
- Inserting at head instead of correct position
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
