Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Rustprogramming~20 mins

Unbounded Knapsack Problem in DSA Rust - Practice Problems & Challenges

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Challenge - 5 Problems
🎖️
Unbounded Knapsack Master
Get all challenges correct to earn this badge!
Test your skills under time pressure!
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
Output of Unbounded Knapsack DP Table
What is the final maximum value returned by this Rust function for the given inputs?
DSA Rust
fn unbounded_knapsack(capacity: usize, weights: &[usize], values: &[usize]) -> usize {
    let mut dp = vec![0; capacity + 1];
    for w in 0..=capacity {
        for i in 0..weights.len() {
            if weights[i] <= w {
                dp[w] = dp[w].max(dp[w - weights[i]] + values[i]);
            }
        }
    }
    dp[capacity]
}

fn main() {
    let capacity = 5;
    let weights = vec![1, 3, 4];
    let values = vec![10, 40, 50];
    let result = unbounded_knapsack(capacity, &weights, &values);
    println!("{}", result);
}
A60
B80
C100
D70
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Think about how many times you can use the item with weight 1 and value 10 to fill capacity 5.
🧠 Conceptual
intermediate
1:30remaining
Understanding Unbounded Knapsack Item Usage
In the unbounded knapsack problem, why can items be chosen multiple times?
ABecause the problem allows unlimited copies of each item to maximize value within capacity.
BBecause each item can only be chosen once but with fractional parts allowed.
CBecause the problem restricts to exactly one copy of each item.
DBecause items are grouped and must be chosen as a group.
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Think about the difference between 0/1 knapsack and unbounded knapsack.
🔧 Debug
advanced
2:00remaining
Identify the Bug in This Unbounded Knapsack Code
What error will this Rust code produce when run?
DSA Rust
fn unbounded_knapsack(capacity: usize, weights: &[usize], values: &[usize]) -> usize {
    let mut dp = vec![0; capacity];
    for w in 0..=capacity {
        for i in 0..weights.len() {
            if weights[i] <= w {
                dp[w] = dp[w].max(dp[w - weights[i]] + values[i]);
            }
        }
    }
    dp[capacity]
}
ANo error, returns correct value
BCompilation error due to missing semicolon
CReturns 0 always
DIndex out of bounds panic at dp[w]
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Check the size of dp vector and the indices accessed.
❓ Predict Output
advanced
2:00remaining
Result of Modified Unbounded Knapsack with Zero Weight Item
What happens when the unbounded knapsack function is called with an item of zero weight?
DSA Rust
fn unbounded_knapsack(capacity: usize, weights: &[usize], values: &[usize]) -> usize {
    let mut dp = vec![0; capacity + 1];
    for w in 0..=capacity {
        for i in 0..weights.len() {
            if weights[i] <= w {
                dp[w] = dp[w].max(dp[w - weights[i]] + values[i]);
            }
        }
    }
    dp[capacity]
}

fn main() {
    let capacity = 5;
    let weights = vec![0, 3];
    let values = vec![10, 40];
    let result = unbounded_knapsack(capacity, &weights, &values);
    println!("{}", result);
}
AInfinite loop or stack overflow due to zero weight item
BReturns 50
CReturns 40
DReturns 0
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Consider what happens when weight is zero in the dp update.
🚀 Application
expert
3:00remaining
Maximum Value for Large Capacity with Given Items
Given items with weights [2, 3, 5] and values [50, 70, 100], what is the maximum value for capacity 10 using unbounded knapsack?
A270
B300
C250
D200
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Try combinations of items to fill capacity 10 for max value.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main difference between the Unbounded Knapsack Problem and the 0/1 Knapsack Problem?
easy
A. There is no difference; both problems are the same.
B. In Unbounded Knapsack, items cannot be repeated.
C. In 0/1 Knapsack, items can be used unlimited times.
D. In Unbounded Knapsack, you can use unlimited copies of each item.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand item usage rules

    In 0/1 Knapsack, each item can be chosen at most once. In Unbounded Knapsack, items can be chosen multiple times.
  2. Step 2: Compare problem definitions

    Unbounded Knapsack allows unlimited copies of each item, unlike 0/1 Knapsack.
  3. Final Answer:

    In Unbounded Knapsack, you can use unlimited copies of each item. -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Unbounded = unlimited copies [OK]
Hint: Unbounded means unlimited items allowed [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing 0/1 and unbounded item usage
  • Thinking items cannot repeat in unbounded knapsack
  • Assuming both problems have same constraints
2. Which of the following Rust code snippets correctly initializes the DP array for the Unbounded Knapsack problem with capacity `W`?
easy
A. let mut dp = vec![std::i32::MAX; W + 1];
B. let mut dp = vec![1; W];
C. let mut dp = vec![0; W + 1];
D. let mut dp = vec![None; W + 1];

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand DP array purpose

    DP array stores max value for capacities from 0 to W, initialized with 0 as base case.
  2. Step 2: Check initialization correctness

    let mut dp = vec![0; W + 1]; initializes dp with zeros for all capacities including 0 to W, which is correct.
  3. Final Answer:

    let mut dp = vec![0; W + 1]; -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    DP array zero-initialized for capacities [OK]
Hint: DP array size = capacity + 1, initialize with zeros [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using MAX instead of 0 for initialization
  • Wrong vector size (W instead of W+1)
  • Using None instead of integer values
3. What will be the output of the following Rust code snippet for Unbounded Knapsack?
let weights = vec![2, 3, 4];
let values = vec![15, 20, 30];
let capacity = 7;
let mut dp = vec![0; capacity + 1];

for w in 1..=capacity {
    for i in 0..weights.len() {
        if weights[i] <= w {
            dp[w] = dp[w].max(dp[w - weights[i]] + values[i]);
        }
    }
}
println!("{}", dp[capacity]);
medium
A. 65
B. 50
C. 45
D. 60

Solution

  1. Step 1: Trace DP array updates for capacity 7

    Calculate max value for each capacity: - w=1: no items fit, dp[1]=0 - w=2: use item 0 (weight 2, value 15), dp[2]=15 - w=3: item 1 fits (3,20), dp[3]=20 - w=4: item 2 fits (4,30), dp[4]=30; also dp[4-2]=dp[2]=15 + 15=30, max=30 - w=5: check items: item0: dp[5-2]=dp[3]=20 +15=35 item1: dp[5-3]=dp[2]=15 +20=35 item2: dp[5-4]=dp[1]=0 +30=30 max=35 - w=6: item0: dp[6-2]=dp[4]=30 +15=45 item1: dp[6-3]=dp[3]=20 +20=40 item2: dp[6-4]=dp[2]=15 +30=45 max=45 - w=7: item0: dp[7-2]=dp[5]=35 +15=50 item1: dp[7-3]=dp[4]=30 +20=50 item2: dp[7-4]=dp[3]=20 +30=50 max=50
  2. Step 2: Verify final dp[7]

    dp[7] = 50
  3. Final Answer:

    50 -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Max value at capacity 7 = 50 [OK]
Hint: Check all items for each capacity and pick max value [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not considering multiple uses of same item
  • Incorrectly updating dp array
  • Off-by-one errors in loops
4. Identify the bug in the following Rust code snippet for Unbounded Knapsack and select the correct fix:
let weights = vec![1, 3, 4];
let values = vec![10, 40, 50];
let capacity = 6;
let mut dp = vec![0; capacity];

for w in 1..=capacity {
    for i in 0..weights.len() {
        if weights[i] <= w {
            dp[w] = dp[w].max(dp[w - weights[i]] + values[i]);
        }
    }
}
println!("{}", dp[capacity]);
medium
A. Initialize dp with size capacity + 1 instead of capacity.
B. Change loop to for w in 0..capacity instead of 1..=capacity.
C. Use dp[w + weights[i]] instead of dp[w - weights[i]].
D. Replace max with min in dp update.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check dp vector size

    dp is initialized with size capacity (6), but indices go up to capacity (6), so dp[6] access is out of bounds.
  2. Step 2: Fix dp size to capacity + 1

    Initialize dp with size capacity + 1 to safely access dp[capacity].
  3. Final Answer:

    Initialize dp with size capacity + 1 instead of capacity. -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    dp size = capacity + 1 to avoid index error [OK]
Hint: DP array size must be capacity + 1 for indexing [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Off-by-one error in dp array size
  • Accessing dp out of bounds
  • Incorrect loop ranges
5. Given items with weights [1, 3, 4] and values [10, 40, 50], and a knapsack capacity of 7, what is the maximum value achievable using the Unbounded Knapsack approach?
hard
A. 90
B. 120
C. 140
D. 110

Solution

  1. Step 1: Calculate dp values for capacities 1 to 7

    Weights = [1,3,4], Values = [10,40,50] - w=1: dp[1] = max(dp[1-1]+10) = 10 - w=2: dp[2] = max(dp[2-1]+10) = dp[1]+10=20 - w=3: dp[3] = max(dp[3-1]+10=dp[2]+10=30, dp[3-3]+40=dp[0]+40=40) = 40 - w=4: dp[4] = max(dp[4-1]+10=dp[3]+10=50, dp[4-3]+40=dp[1]+40=50, dp[4-4]+50=dp[0]+50=50) = 50 - w=5: dp[5] = max(dp[5-1]+10=dp[4]+10=60, dp[5-3]+40=dp[2]+40=60, dp[5-4]+50=dp[1]+50=60) = 60 - w=6: dp[6] = max(dp[6-1]+10=dp[5]+10=70, dp[6-3]+40=dp[3]+40=80, dp[6-4]+50=dp[2]+50=70) = 80 - w=7: dp[7] = max(dp[7-1]+10=dp[6]+10=90, dp[7-3]+40=dp[4]+40=90, dp[7-4]+50=dp[3]+50=90) = 90
  2. Step 2: Re-check calculations for maximum value

    Check if combining items differently yields more: Try using item 3 (weight 4, value 50) twice: total weight 8 > 7 (not possible) Try using item 1 (weight 1, value 10) seven times: 7*10=70 < 90 Try using item 2 (weight 3, value 40) twice + item 1 once: 3+3+1=7 weight, value=40+40+10=90 Maximum value is 90.
  3. Final Answer:

    90 -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Max value at capacity 7 = 90 [OK]
Hint: Build dp from 1 to capacity, pick max value each step [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring multiple item usage
  • Wrong dp updates
  • Miscalculating max values
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard