What is the Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) in a sequence of numbers?
The Longest Increasing Subsequence is the longest sequence of numbers from the original sequence where each number is strictly greater than the previous one, but the numbers do not need to be consecutive in the original sequence.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the classic dynamic programming solution for LIS?
The classic dynamic programming solution for LIS has a time complexity of O(n²), where n is the length of the input sequence.
Click to reveal answer
advanced
What data structure helps optimize the LIS solution to O(n log n) time?
A binary search on a temporary array (or vector) that stores the smallest possible tail values for increasing subsequences of different lengths helps optimize LIS to O(n log n).
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
In Rust, which method can be used to perform binary search on a vector for LIS optimization?
In Rust, the methods `binary_search` or `binary_search_by` on slices can be used to perform binary search for LIS optimization.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why does LIS not require the subsequence elements to be contiguous?
Because LIS focuses on the order and increasing property, elements can be picked from anywhere in the sequence as long as they maintain the increasing order, so they do not need to be next to each other.
Click to reveal answer
What does LIS stand for in algorithms?
ALongest Increasing Subsequence
BLargest Integer Sum
CLeast Insertion Steps
DLongest Indexed Sequence
✗ Incorrect
LIS stands for Longest Increasing Subsequence.
What is the main goal of the LIS problem?
AFind the shortest increasing sequence
BFind the longest sequence of increasing numbers in order
CFind the largest sum of numbers
DFind the longest sequence of consecutive numbers
✗ Incorrect
The goal is to find the longest sequence where each number is bigger than the previous one, maintaining order.
Which approach improves LIS solution from O(n²) to O(n log n)?
AUsing binary search on a helper array
BUsing recursion without memoization
CSorting the input array first
DUsing a stack data structure
✗ Incorrect
Binary search on a helper array storing minimal tail values speeds up LIS to O(n log n).
In Rust, which method helps find the position to insert an element in a sorted vector?
Apush
Bfind
Csort
Dbinary_search or binary_search_by
✗ Incorrect
binary_search or binary_search_by returns the position to insert or find an element in a sorted vector.
Does the LIS subsequence need to be made of consecutive elements from the original sequence?
ANo, elements can be in any order
BYes, elements must be consecutive
CNo, elements can be non-consecutive but must be in order
DYes, but only if they are equal
✗ Incorrect
LIS elements must be in increasing order but do not need to be next to each other.
Explain the difference between a subsequence and a substring in the context of LIS.
Think about whether elements need to be next to each other.
You got /4 concepts.
Describe how binary search helps optimize the LIS algorithm.
Focus on how searching quickly helps update the helper array.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) problem ask for in a given list of numbers?
easy
A. The longest sequence where each number is larger than the previous one
B. The longest sequence where each number is smaller than the previous one
C. The longest sequence of equal numbers
D. The shortest sequence containing all numbers
Solution
Step 1: Understand the LIS definition
The Longest Increasing Subsequence is the longest part of the list where every next number is bigger than the one before.
Step 2: Compare options with definition
The longest sequence where each number is larger than the previous one matches the definition exactly. Other options describe different sequences.
Final Answer:
The longest sequence where each number is larger than the previous one -> Option A
Quick Check:
LIS = longest increasing sequence [OK]
Hint: LIS means strictly increasing sequence length [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing increasing with decreasing sequences
Thinking LIS means equal numbers
Mixing LIS with shortest sequences
2. Which Rust code snippet correctly initializes a vector to store LIS lengths for each element in a list named nums?
easy
A. let mut lis = vec![0; nums.len()];
B. let mut lis = vec![1; nums.len()];
C. let lis = vec![0; nums.len()];
D. let lis = vec![1; nums.len()];
Solution
Step 1: Understand LIS initialization
Each element starts with LIS length 1 because the smallest subsequence includes the element itself.
Step 2: Check Rust syntax for mutable vector
We need a mutable vector to update LIS values, so mut is required. The vector should be initialized with 1s.
Final Answer:
let mut lis = vec![1; nums.len()]; -> Option B
Quick Check:
Mutable vector with 1s = let mut lis = vec![1; nums.len()]; [OK]
Hint: LIS lengths start at 1, vector must be mutable [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Initializing with zeros instead of ones
Forgetting mut keyword for updates
Using immutable vector when updates needed
3. What is the output of the following Rust code that calculates the length of the LIS for nums = vec![10, 9, 2, 5, 3, 7, 101, 18]?
fn length_of_lis(nums: Vec<i32>) -> usize {
let n = nums.len();
let mut lis = vec![1; n];
for i in 1..n {
for j in 0..i {
if nums[i] > nums[j] {
lis[i] = lis[i].max(lis[j] + 1);
}
}
}
*lis.iter().max().unwrap()
}
fn main() {
let nums = vec![10, 9, 2, 5, 3, 7, 101, 18];
println!("{}", length_of_lis(nums));
}
The maximum value in lis is 4, which is the length of the longest increasing subsequence.
Final Answer:
4 -> Option A
Quick Check:
LIS length = 4 [OK]
Hint: Trace LIS array updates carefully for each element [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Counting non-increasing sequences
Forgetting to update lis[i] with max value
Misreading the nested loops
4. Identify the bug in this Rust function that attempts to compute the LIS length:
fn length_of_lis(nums: Vec<i32>) -> usize {
let n = nums.len();
let mut lis = vec![1; n];
for i in 0..n {
for j in 0..i {
if nums[i] < nums[j] {
lis[i] = lis[i].max(lis[j] + 1);
}
}
}
*lis.iter().max().unwrap()
}
What is the error?
medium
A. The function should return the sum of lis instead of max
B. The vector lis should be initialized with zeros instead of ones
C. The outer loop should start from 1 instead of 0
D. The comparison should be nums[i] > nums[j] instead of nums[i] < nums[j]
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the comparison condition
The LIS requires increasing order, so we must check if nums[i] > nums[j]. The code incorrectly uses nums[i] < nums[j], which finds decreasing sequences.
Step 2: Confirm other parts are correct
Initialization with ones and returning max are correct. Starting outer loop at 0 is valid but less efficient.
Final Answer:
The comparison should be nums[i] > nums[j] instead of nums[i] < nums[j] -> Option D
Quick Check:
Correct comparison is > for LIS [OK]
Hint: Check comparison signs for increasing sequences [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using less than instead of greater than
Initializing lis with zeros
Returning sum instead of max
5. Given a list nums = vec![3, 10, 2, 1, 20], how would you modify the LIS algorithm to also return the actual longest increasing subsequence, not just its length?
hard
A. Sort the list first, then find LIS length on sorted list
B. Use a stack to push elements and pop when sequence breaks
C. Keep a predecessor array to track previous indices and reconstruct the sequence after computing LIS lengths
D. Return the maximum value in nums as the LIS length and sequence
Solution
Step 1: Understand LIS length vs sequence
Length calculation only tracks counts. To get the sequence, we must remember which elements lead to current LIS values.
Step 2: Use predecessor array for reconstruction
Maintain an array storing the index of the previous element in the LIS for each position. After LIS lengths are computed, backtrack from the max index to build the sequence.
Step 3: Reject incorrect options
Sorting changes order, invalid for LIS. Stack method is not standard for LIS. Returning max value is incorrect.
Final Answer:
Keep a predecessor array to track previous indices and reconstruct the sequence after computing LIS lengths -> Option C
Quick Check:
Predecessor array enables LIS reconstruction [OK]
Hint: Track previous indices to rebuild LIS sequence [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Sorting input before LIS calculation
Confusing stack usage with LIS logic
Returning max element instead of sequence
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.