📖 Scenario: You are building a simple program to find the Fibonacci number at a given position. Fibonacci numbers start with 0 and 1, and each next number is the sum of the two before it. To make this fast, you will use a method called Dynamic Programming (DP) which remembers past results to avoid repeating work.
🎯 Goal: Build a Rust program that calculates the Fibonacci number at position n using dynamic programming with a vector to store intermediate results.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create a vector called fib with the first two Fibonacci numbers: 0 and 1
Create a variable called n and set it to 10
Use a for loop with variable i from 2 to n (inclusive) to fill the fib vector with Fibonacci numbers
Print the Fibonacci number at position n from the fib vector
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Calculating Fibonacci numbers efficiently is useful in computer science problems like algorithm design, financial modeling, and nature simulations.
💼 Career
Understanding dynamic programming and efficient computation is important for software development, especially in roles involving algorithms and performance optimization.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create the initial Fibonacci vector
Create a vector called fib with the first two Fibonacci numbers: 0 and 1.
DSA Rust
Hint
Use vec![0, 1] to create the vector with first two Fibonacci numbers.
2
Set the position variable n
Create a variable called n and set it to 10.
DSA Rust
Hint
Use let n = 10; to create the variable.
3
Fill the vector with Fibonacci numbers using a loop
Use a for loop with variable i from 2 to n (inclusive) to calculate Fibonacci numbers and push them into the fib vector. Calculate each new number as the sum of fib[i - 1] and fib[i - 2].
DSA Rust
Hint
Use for i in 2..=n and inside the loop calculate next = fib[i - 1] + fib[i - 2] then push next to fib.
4
Print the Fibonacci number at position n
Print the Fibonacci number at position n from the fib vector using println!.
DSA Rust
Hint
Use println!("{}", fib[n]); to print the Fibonacci number at position n.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main advantage of using dynamic programming (DP) to calculate Fibonacci numbers compared to a simple recursive approach?
easy
A. It avoids repeated calculations by storing intermediate results.
B. It uses less memory by not storing any results.
C. It calculates Fibonacci numbers using only recursion without loops.
D. It always runs in constant time regardless of input size.
Simple recursion recalculates the same Fibonacci values many times, causing exponential time complexity.
Step 2: How DP improves calculation
DP stores intermediate Fibonacci values in a table (memoization or tabulation), so each value is computed once.
Final Answer:
It avoids repeated calculations by storing intermediate results. -> Option A
Quick Check:
DP stores results to avoid repeats [OK]
Hint: DP saves previous results to speed up Fibonacci [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking DP uses no extra memory
Believing DP always runs in constant time
Confusing recursion with DP
2. Which of the following Rust code snippets correctly initializes a vector to store Fibonacci numbers for dynamic programming?
easy
A. let fib = vec![0; n];
B. let mut fib = vec![0; n+1];
C. let mut fib = Vec::new();
D. let fib = [0; n+1];
Solution
Step 1: Check vector size for DP storage
We need a vector of size n+1 to store Fibonacci numbers from 0 to n.
Step 2: Verify mutability and initialization
Vector must be mutable to update values; initialized with zeros for all positions.
Final Answer:
let mut fib = vec![0; n+1]; -> Option B
Quick Check:
Mutable vector with n+1 zeros [OK]
Hint: Use mutable vector with size n+1 for DP array [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using immutable vector when updates needed
Incorrect vector size causing index errors
Using fixed-size array without mutability
3. What will be the output of the following Rust code that uses bottom-up DP to compute Fibonacci numbers?
fn fib(n: usize) -> usize {
let mut dp = vec![0; n+1];
dp[1] = 1;
for i in 2..=n {
dp[i] = dp[i-1] + dp[i-2];
}
dp[n]
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", fib(5));
}
medium
A. 13
B. 8
C. 5
D. 3
Solution
Step 1: Trace DP array filling for n=5
dp[0]=0, dp[1]=1; then dp[2]=1, dp[3]=2, dp[4]=3, dp[5]=5.
Step 2: Return dp[5]
Function returns dp[5], which is 5.
Final Answer:
5 -> Option C
Quick Check:
Fibonacci(5) = 5 [OK]
Hint: Bottom-up DP sums previous two values [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing index starting points
Off-by-one errors in loop range
Misreading dp array values
4. Identify the error in this Rust code for Fibonacci using DP and select the correct fix:
fn fib(n: usize) -> usize {
let mut dp = vec![0; n];
dp[0] = 0;
dp[1] = 1;
for i in 2..=n {
dp[i] = dp[i-1] + dp[i-2];
}
dp[n]
}
medium
A. Change vector size to n+1 and return dp[n]
B. Change vector size to n and return dp[n-1]
C. Initialize dp with zeros and ones alternatively
D. Remove dp[0] assignment since it's zero by default
Solution
Step 1: Check vector size and indexing
Vector size is n (indices 0 to n-1), but loop 2..=n and dp[n] access index n, causing out of bounds panic.
Step 2: Fix vector size
Change to vec![0; n+1] to store values up to index n.
Final Answer:
Change vector size to n+1 and return dp[n] -> Option A
Quick Check:
Size n+1 for indices 0 to n [OK]
Hint: Vector of size n+1 stores fib[0..n] [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Accessing dp[n] causing panic
Incorrect vector size for indexing
Ignoring zero-based indexing
5. You want to compute the 10th Fibonacci number using top-down DP (memoization) in Rust. Which code snippet correctly implements memoization to avoid repeated calculations?
fn fib_memo(n: usize, memo: &mut Vec) -> usize {
if n <= 1 {
return n;
}
if let Some(val) = memo[n] {
return val;
}
let result = fib_memo(n-1, memo) + fib_memo(n-2, memo);
memo[n] = Some(result);
result
}
fn main() {
let n = 10;
let mut memo = vec![None; n+1];
println!("{}", fib_memo(n, &mut memo));
}
hard
A. Incorrect because base case should return 0 for n=1
B. Incorrect because memo vector should store usize, not Option<usize>
C. Incorrect because memo is not passed as mutable reference
D. Correct implementation of top-down DP with memoization
Solution
Step 1: Check memo vector type and initialization
Memo uses Option<usize> to track computed values; initialized with None for all indices.
Step 2: Verify memoization logic
Function returns stored value if present; otherwise computes recursively and stores result.
Step 3: Confirm base case correctness
Returns n for n=0 or 1, which matches Fibonacci definition.
Final Answer:
Correct implementation of top-down DP with memoization -> Option D
Quick Check:
Memo stores Option, uses recursion with caching [OK]
Hint: Use Option to track computed Fibonacci values [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using usize vector without Option causes wrong caching
Wrong base case returns
Not passing memo as mutable reference
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.