DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum in DSA Rust - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What is the main goal of the DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum problem?

To find the maximum sum of values along any path in a tree, where a path can start and end at any nodes.

beginner

In DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum, why do we use a post-order traversal?

Because we need to calculate the maximum path sums of child nodes before computing the parent's maximum path sum.

intermediate

What does the DP state represent in the Maximum Path Sum on Trees problem?

The DP state usually represents the maximum path sum starting from the current node and extending downwards to one of its children.

intermediate

How do we update the global maximum path sum during the DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum?

We consider the sum of the current node's value plus the maximum path sums from up to two children, updating the global max if this sum is larger.

intermediate

Why do we ignore negative path sums from children in DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum?

Because including negative sums would reduce the total path sum, so we treat negative sums as zero to maximize the path sum.

In DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum, what traversal order is best to compute the solution?

A Post-order traversal

B Pre-order traversal

C In-order traversal

D Level-order traversal

Post-order traversal ensures child nodes are processed before their parent, which is necessary for bottom-up DP.

What does the DP state typically store in the Maximum Path Sum on Trees problem?

A Sum of all nodes in the tree

B Minimum path sum in the tree

C Number of nodes in the longest path

D Maximum path sum starting from the current node downwards

The DP state stores the maximum sum of a path starting at the current node and going down to one child.

Why do we ignore negative child path sums in the DP calculation?

A Negative sums increase the total path sum

B Negative sums reduce the total path sum

C Negative sums are always zero

D Negative sums are not allowed in trees

Ignoring negative sums prevents decreasing the total path sum, so we treat them as zero.

When updating the global maximum path sum, which nodes are considered?

A All nodes in the tree

B Only the current node

C Current node plus up to two children paths

D Only leaf nodes

The maximum path can pass through the current node and include up to two children paths.

What is the time complexity of DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum for a tree with n nodes?

A O(n)

B O(n^2)

C O(log n)

D O(n log n)

Each node is visited once in post-order traversal, so the time complexity is linear O(n).

Explain how dynamic programming is applied to find the maximum path sum in a tree.

Think about how you combine child results to build the parent's solution.

Describe why negative path sums from children are treated as zero in the DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum problem.

Consider what happens if you add a negative number to a sum you want to maximize.

Practice

1. What does the "maximum path sum" in a tree represent in the context of DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum?

easy

A. The largest sum of node values along any path between two nodes in the tree

B. The sum of all node values in the tree

C. The maximum value of a single node in the tree

D. The number of nodes in the longest path of the tree

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the definition of path sum

   The path sum is the total of node values along a path connecting two nodes in the tree.

2. Step 2: Identify the maximum path sum meaning

   The maximum path sum is the largest such sum among all possible paths in the tree.

3. Final Answer:

   The largest sum of node values along any path between two nodes in the tree -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Maximum path sum = largest node value sum on any path [OK]

Hint: Maximum path sum is about sums on paths, not single nodes [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing maximum path sum with sum of all nodes
• Thinking it is just the max node value
• Counting number of nodes instead of sum

2. Which of the following Rust function signatures is correct for a recursive function that calculates the maximum path sum in a binary tree node defined as struct TreeNode { val: i32, left: Option, right: Option }?

easy

A. fn max_path_sum(node: Box<TreeNode>) -> Option<i32>

B. fn max_path_sum(node: TreeNode) -> i32

C. fn max_path_sum(node: &Option) -> i32

D. fn max_path_sum(node: &TreeNode) -> Option<i32>

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand ownership and borrowing in Rust

   Recursive tree functions usually borrow nodes to avoid ownership transfer and cloning.

2. Step 2: Match function signature to tree node type

   The tree node is wrapped in Option, so borrowing it as &Option is correct for recursion.

3. Final Answer:

   fn max_path_sum(node: &Option) -> i32 -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Borrow Option and return i32 [OK]

Hint: Use &Option to borrow nodes recursively [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Taking ownership of node causing move errors
• Returning Option<i32> unnecessarily
• Using &TreeNode instead of &Option

3. Given the following Rust code snippet for maximum path sum in a binary tree, what is the output printed?

struct TreeNode {
    val: i32,
    left: Option,
    right: Option,
}

fn max_gain(node: &Option, max_sum: &mut i32) -> i32 {
    if let Some(n) = node {
        let left_gain = max_gain(&n.left, max_sum).max(0);
        let right_gain = max_gain(&n.right, max_sum).max(0);
        let price_newpath = n.val + left_gain + right_gain;
        *max_sum = (*max_sum).max(price_newpath);
        n.val + left_gain.max(right_gain)
    } else {
        0
    }
}

fn max_path_sum(root: &Option) -> i32 {
    let mut max_sum = i32::MIN;
    max_gain(root, &mut max_sum);
    max_sum
}

fn main() {
    let root = Some(Box::new(TreeNode {
        val: -10,
        left: Some(Box::new(TreeNode {
            val: 9,
            left: None,
            right: None,
        })),
        right: Some(Box::new(TreeNode {
            val: 20,
            left: Some(Box::new(TreeNode {
                val: 15,
                left: None,
                right: None,
            })),
            right: Some(Box::new(TreeNode {
                val: 7,
                left: None,
                right: None,
            })),
        })),
    }));
    println!("{}", max_path_sum(&root));
}

medium

A. 42

B. 35

C. 27

D. 20

Solution

1. Step 1: Calculate max path sums for each subtree

   Calculate max gains: - Left subtree (9): max gain = 9 - Right subtree: - Left child (15): max gain = 15 - Right child (7): max gain = 7 - Node 20: max gain = 20 + max(15,7) = 35 - Max path through 20: 20 + 15 + 7 = 42

2. Step 2: Calculate max path including root (-10)

   Root max gain = -10 + max(9, 35) = 25 Max path sum is max of: - Left subtree max: 9 - Right subtree max: 42 - Root path: 25 So max path sum = 42

3. Final Answer:

   42 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Max path sum = 42 [OK]

Hint: Add node value plus max left/right gains, track max path [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Ignoring negative values and not using max(0, gain)
• Adding gains incorrectly for path through root
• Confusing max gain with max path sum

4. The following Rust function attempts to compute the maximum path sum in a binary tree but contains a bug. What is the bug?

fn max_gain(node: &Option, max_sum: &mut i32) -> i32 {
    if let Some(n) = node {
        let left_gain = max_gain(&n.left, max_sum);
        let right_gain = max_gain(&n.right, max_sum);
        let price_newpath = n.val + left_gain + right_gain;
        *max_sum = (*max_sum).max(price_newpath);
        n.val + left_gain.max(right_gain)
    } else {
        0
    }
}

medium

A. It incorrectly updates max_sum inside recursion

B. It does not handle empty tree nodes

C. It returns the sum of left and right gains instead of max

D. It does not ignore negative gains by using max(0, gain)

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze gain calculation for left and right subtrees

   The function uses left_gain and right_gain directly without ignoring negative values, which can reduce the path sum.

2. Step 2: Identify the fix for negative gains

   Correct approach is to use max_gain = max(0, recursive_gain) to ignore negative paths that reduce sum.

3. Final Answer:

   It does not ignore negative gains by using max(0, gain) -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Use max(0, gain) to avoid negative path sums [OK]

Hint: Always ignore negative gains with max(0, gain) [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Forgetting to ignore negative subtree sums
• Updating max_sum incorrectly
• Returning wrong values from recursion

5. You want to modify the maximum path sum algorithm to find the maximum path sum that must include the root node in a binary tree. Which change should you make to the existing DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum approach?

hard

A. Use a global variable to store max sum and update it only when the path includes root and both children

B. Return the sum of the root value plus the maximum gain from either left or right subtree only, and track max sum accordingly

C. Calculate max path sum as usual but ignore paths that do not include the root node

D. Traverse the tree twice: once for max path sum and once for root-included path sum, then compare

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the root-included path sum requirement

   The path must include the root node, so the path is root plus one subtree path (left or right), not both sides.

2. Step 2: Modify the gain calculation accordingly

   Return root.val + max(left_gain, right_gain) ignoring negative gains, and track max sum as this value.

3. Final Answer:

   Return the sum of the root value plus the maximum gain from either left or right subtree only, and track max sum accordingly -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Root-included max path = root + max(left, right) [OK]

Hint: Include root plus max one subtree gain only [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Adding both left and right gains when root must be included
• Ignoring negative gains
• Trying to filter paths after calculation