Bellman Ford Algorithm Negative Weights in DSA Rust - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Bellman Ford Algorithm Negative Weights

O(V * E)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how the time needed to find shortest paths changes as the graph grows.

How does the Bellman Ford algorithm behave when there are negative weights?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

fn bellman_ford(edges: &[(usize, usize, i32)], vertices: usize, source: usize) -> Vec {
    let mut dist = vec![i32::MAX; vertices];
    dist[source] = 0;
    for _ in 0..vertices - 1 {
        for &(u, v, w) in edges {
            if dist[u] != i32::MAX && dist[u] + w < dist[v] {
                dist[v] = dist[u] + w;
            }
        }
    }
    dist
}
    

This code finds shortest paths from a source to all vertices, even with negative weights, by relaxing edges multiple times.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: The inner loop that goes through all edges to update distances.
• How many times: The outer loop runs (vertices - 1) times, repeating the inner loop each time.

How Execution Grows With Input

Each vertex causes the algorithm to check all edges again, so work grows with both vertices and edges.

Input Size (vertices, edges)	Approx. Operations
10 vertices, 20 edges	~ 9 * 20 = 180
100 vertices, 500 edges	~ 99 * 500 = 49,500
1000 vertices, 2000 edges	~ 999 * 2000 = 1,998,000

Pattern observation: Operations grow roughly by multiplying vertices and edges, so doubling either doubles the work.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(V * E)

This means the time needed grows by the number of vertices times the number of edges in the graph.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "The algorithm only needs to check edges once, so it runs in O(E) time."

[OK] Correct: The algorithm must repeat edge checks (V-1) times to ensure shortest paths, especially with negative weights.

Interview Connect

Understanding this time complexity helps you explain how algorithms handle tricky cases like negative weights and why some algorithms take longer.

Self-Check

"What if we stopped the algorithm early when no distances change in an iteration? How would that affect the time complexity?"

Practice

1. What is the main advantage of the Bellman-Ford algorithm compared to Dijkstra's algorithm?

easy

A. It can handle graphs with negative weight edges.

B. It runs faster on all graphs.

C. It uses less memory.

D. It only works on directed acyclic graphs.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the limitation of Dijkstra's algorithm

   Dijkstra's algorithm cannot correctly handle graphs with negative weight edges because it assumes that once a node's shortest path is found, it cannot be improved.

2. Step 2: Identify Bellman-Ford's capability

   Bellman-Ford algorithm can handle negative weight edges and detect negative weight cycles, making it more versatile for such graphs.

3. Final Answer:

   It can handle graphs with negative weight edges. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Negative weights handled = A [OK]

Hint: Bellman-Ford works with negative edges, Dijkstra doesn't [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking Bellman-Ford is always faster
• Assuming it uses less memory
• Believing it only works on acyclic graphs

2. Which of the following Rust code snippets correctly initializes the distance vector for Bellman-Ford with 5 vertices, starting from vertex 0?

easy

A. let mut dist = vec![i32::MIN; 5]; dist[0] = 0;

B. let mut dist = vec![0; 5]; dist[0] = i32::MAX;

C. let mut dist = vec![0; 5];

D. let mut dist = vec![i32::MAX; 5]; dist[0] = 0;

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand initialization for Bellman-Ford

   Distances to all vertices except the source should be set to a very large number (infinity), here represented by i32::MAX. The source vertex distance is set to 0.

2. Step 2: Check each option

   let mut dist = vec![i32::MAX; 5]; dist[0] = 0; correctly sets all distances to i32::MAX and source (index 0) to 0. Others either invert this or use wrong values.

3. Final Answer:

   let mut dist = vec![i32::MAX; 5]; dist[0] = 0; -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Initialize distances with max except source 0 = D [OK]

Hint: Set all distances max except source zero [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Setting source distance to max instead of zero
• Initializing all distances to zero
• Using i32::MIN which is negative infinity

3. What will be the output distances vector after running one iteration of Bellman-Ford on this graph with edges:
edges = [(0, 1, 4), (0, 2, 5), (1, 2, -3), (2, 3, 4)] starting from vertex 0?
Initial distances: [0, i32::MAX, i32::MAX, i32::MAX]

medium

A. [0, 4, 5, i32::MAX]

B. [0, 4, 1, 5]

C. [0, 4, 5, 9]

D. [0, 4, 1, i32::MAX]

Solution

1. Step 1: Relax edges once from initial distances

   Start distances: [0, MAX, MAX, MAX]. Relax edges:
   - Edge (0->1,4): dist[1] = min(MAX, 0+4) = 4
   - Edge (0->2,5): dist[2] = min(MAX, 0+5) = 5
   - Edge (1->2,-3): dist[2] = min(5, 4-3) = 1
   - Edge (2->3,4): dist[3] = min(MAX, 1+4) = 5

2. Step 2: Determine distances after one iteration

   After relaxing all edges once, distances are [0, 4, 1, 5]. But since the question asks after one iteration (one full pass), all edges are relaxed once, so the final distances are [0, 4, 1, 5].

3. Final Answer:

   [0, 4, 1, 5] -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Relax edges once = [0,4,1,5] [OK]

Hint: Relax all edges once to update distances [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not relaxing edges in order
• Ignoring negative edge effect
• Stopping after partial relaxation

4. Consider this Rust code snippet for Bellman-Ford. What is the bug causing incorrect detection of negative cycles?

for _ in 0..graph.len() {
    for &(u, v, w) in &edges {
        if dist[u] != i32::MAX && dist[u] + w < dist[v] {
            dist[v] = dist[u] + w;
        }
    }
}
// Check for negative cycle
for &(u, v, w) in &edges {
    if dist[u] != i32::MAX && dist[u] + w < dist[v] {
        return true; // Negative cycle detected
    }
}
return false;

medium

A. The outer loop should run graph.len() - 1 times, not graph.len() times.

B. The distance vector is not initialized properly.

C. The negative cycle check should be inside the outer loop.

D. Edges should be relaxed in reverse order.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand Bellman-Ford iteration count

   Bellman-Ford requires relaxing edges exactly |V| - 1 times (where |V| is number of vertices) to find shortest paths. Running it |V| times can cause incorrect behavior.

2. Step 2: Identify the bug in loop count

   The code runs the outer loop graph.len() times (equal to |V|), which is one too many. This can cause false detection of negative cycles.

3. Final Answer:

   The outer loop should run graph.len() - 1 times, not graph.len() times. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Relax edges |V|-1 times = A [OK]

Hint: Relax edges exactly vertices minus one times [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Running relaxation too many times
• Checking negative cycle inside main loop
• Incorrect distance initialization

5. You have a graph with 4 vertices and edges:
[(0, 1, 1), (1, 2, -1), (2, 3, -1), (3, 1, -1)]. Using Bellman-Ford starting from vertex 0, what will the algorithm detect?

hard

A. No negative cycle, shortest paths found.

B. Algorithm will run infinitely without detection.

C. Negative cycle detected involving vertices 1, 2, and 3.

D. Only positive weight cycles detected.

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze the cycle formed by edges

   The edges (1->2, -1), (2->3, -1), and (3->1, -1) form a cycle with total weight -3, which is negative.

2. Step 2: Bellman-Ford detects negative cycles reachable from source

   Since this negative cycle is reachable from vertex 0 via edge (0->1), Bellman-Ford will detect it during the negative cycle check.

3. Final Answer:

   Negative cycle detected involving vertices 1, 2, and 3. -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Negative cycle in reachable cycle = C [OK]

Hint: Check cycles reachable from source for negative sum [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Ignoring negative cycle presence
• Assuming algorithm runs infinitely
• Thinking only positive cycles exist