BST Property and Why It Matters in DSA Rust - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What is the BST property?

In a Binary Search Tree (BST), for every node, all values in its left subtree are smaller, and all values in its right subtree are larger than the node's value.

beginner

Why does the BST property matter for searching?

Because the BST property keeps values ordered, it allows fast searching by deciding to go left or right at each node, reducing the search space quickly.

beginner

How does the BST property help in insertion?

When inserting, the BST property guides where to place the new value by comparing it with nodes, ensuring the tree stays ordered for future operations.

intermediate

What happens if the BST property is broken?

If the BST property is broken, searching and other operations become inefficient, possibly degrading to linear time like a linked list.

beginner

Explain the BST property using a real-life example.

Imagine a phone book sorted by names: all names before a certain name come alphabetically earlier (left), and all after come later (right). This order helps find a name quickly, just like BST property helps find values fast.

What must be true for every node in a BST?

A Left subtree values are smaller, right subtree values are larger

B Left subtree values are larger, right subtree values are smaller

C All subtree values are equal

D No specific order is required

The BST property requires left subtree values to be smaller and right subtree values to be larger than the node.

Why is the BST property important for searching?

A It prevents duplicates

B It stores values randomly

C It allows skipping half the tree at each step

D It makes the tree balanced automatically

The BST property lets us decide to go left or right, skipping half the tree each time, speeding up search.

If the BST property is broken, what happens?

A Search becomes slower, like a linked list

B Search becomes faster

C Insertion is impossible

D Tree becomes balanced

Without the BST property, the tree loses order, making search slower and less efficient.

When inserting a new value in a BST, how do you decide where to put it?

A Always insert at the root

B Compare with nodes and go left if smaller, right if larger

C Insert randomly

D Insert only at leaves

Insertion follows the BST property by comparing values and placing the new node accordingly.

Which real-life example best illustrates the BST property?

A A stack of papers

B A random list of names

C A queue of customers

D A sorted phone book

A sorted phone book orders names so you can quickly find one, similar to how BST property orders values.

Explain the BST property and why it is important for efficient searching.

Think about how ordering helps find values faster.

Describe what could go wrong if the BST property is not maintained.

Consider how a broken order affects finding values.

Practice

1. What is the main property that defines a Binary Search Tree (BST)?

easy

A. For each node, all values in the left subtree are smaller, and all values in the right subtree are larger.

B. Each node has exactly two children.

C. All leaf nodes are at the same depth.

D. Nodes are arranged in a complete binary tree structure.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand BST definition

   A BST requires that for every node, values in the left subtree are smaller and values in the right subtree are larger.

2. Step 2: Compare options to BST property

   For each node, all values in the left subtree are smaller, and all values in the right subtree are larger. matches this definition exactly, while others describe different tree types or properties.

3. Final Answer:

   For each node, all values in the left subtree are smaller, and all values in the right subtree are larger. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   BST property = For each node, all values in the left subtree are smaller, and all values in the right subtree are larger. [OK]

Hint: Remember: left < node < right in BST [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing BST with complete binary tree
• Thinking all nodes must have two children
• Assuming leaf nodes must be at same depth

2. Which Rust code snippet correctly declares a BST node struct with optional left and right children?

easy

A. struct Node { value: i32, left: Option<Node>, right: Option<Node> }

B. struct Node { value: i32, left: Option, right: Option }

C. struct Node { value: i32, left: Box<Node>, right: Box<Node> }

D. struct Node { value: i32, left: Node, right: Node }

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand Rust ownership and recursive types

   Recursive structs in Rust must use Box to allocate on heap and Option for nullable children.

2. Step 2: Check each option

   struct Node { value: i32, left: Option, right: Option } uses Option correctly. Using Node directly or Option<Node> (without Box) causes infinite size. struct Node { value: i32, left: Box<Node>, right: Box<Node> } misses Option, so children can't be null.

3. Final Answer:

   struct Node { value: i32, left: Option, right: Option } -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Use Option for nullable recursive fields [OK]

Hint: Use Option for nullable recursive nodes in Rust [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Omitting Option for nullable children
• Using Node directly causing infinite size error
• Not boxing recursive fields

3. Given the following Rust code inserting values into a BST, what is the in-order traversal output?

struct Node { value: i32, left: Option, right: Option }

fn insert(root: &mut Option, val: i32) {
    match root {
        None => *root = Some(Box::new(Node { value: val, left: None, right: None })),
        Some(node) => {
            if val < node.value {
                insert(&mut node.left, val);
            } else {
                insert(&mut node.right, val);
            }
        }
    }
}

fn inorder(root: &Option, vals: &mut Vec<i32>) {
    if let Some(node) = root {
        inorder(&node.left, vals);
        vals.push(node.value);
        inorder(&node.right, vals);
    }
}

fn main() {
    let mut root = None;
    insert(&mut root, 10);
    insert(&mut root, 5);
    insert(&mut root, 15);
    insert(&mut root, 7);
    let mut result = Vec::new();
    inorder(&root, &mut result);
    println!("{:?}", result);
}

medium

A. [5, 7, 10, 15]

B. [10, 5, 7, 15]

C. [15, 10, 7, 5]

D. [7, 5, 10, 15]

Solution

1. Step 1: Insert values into BST

   Insert 10 as root, 5 to left, 15 to right, 7 to right of 5.

2. Step 2: Perform in-order traversal

   In-order visits left subtree, node, then right subtree. So order is 5, 7, 10, 15.

3. Final Answer:

   [5, 7, 10, 15] -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   In-order traversal of BST = sorted values [OK]

Hint: In-order traversal of BST gives sorted values [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing traversal order
• Inserting nodes incorrectly
• Assuming pre-order or post-order output

4. The following Rust function is intended to check if a tree is a valid BST. What is the bug?

fn is_bst(node: &Option, min: i32, max: i32) -> bool {
    match node {
        None => true,
        Some(n) => {
            if n.value <= min || n.value >= max {
                return false;
            }
            is_bst(&n.left, min, n.value) && is_bst(&n.right, n.value, max)
        }
    }
}

medium

A. The function should return false when node is None.

B. The function does not handle empty trees correctly.

C. The min and max parameters are not updated correctly during recursion.

D. The comparison uses <= and >= instead of < and >, disallowing duplicate values.

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze comparison operators

   The function uses <= and >= which disallow equal values, meaning duplicates are not allowed.

2. Step 2: Understand BST duplicate handling

   Some BST definitions allow duplicates on one side (usually right). Using strict < and > allows duplicates on one side.

3. Final Answer:

   The comparison uses <= and >= instead of < and >, disallowing duplicate values. -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Use < and > to allow duplicates in BST check [OK]

Hint: Use strict < and > to allow duplicates in BST check [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking None nodes cause errors
• Believing min/max are updated incorrectly
• Assuming empty tree is invalid

5. You want to find the kth smallest element in a BST efficiently. Which approach best uses the BST property to achieve this?

hard

A. Convert the BST to a sorted array and then access the kth element.

B. Perform a pre-order traversal and count nodes until k is reached.

C. Perform an in-order traversal and return the kth element visited.

D. Traverse the tree level by level until the kth node is found.

Solution

1. Step 1: Recall BST in-order traversal property

   In-order traversal visits nodes in ascending order due to BST property.

2. Step 2: Use in-order traversal to find kth smallest

   Counting nodes during in-order traversal lets you stop at kth smallest efficiently without extra sorting.

3. Final Answer:

   Perform an in-order traversal and return the kth element visited. -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   In-order traversal gives sorted order, find kth element [OK]

Hint: Use in-order traversal to get sorted nodes and pick kth [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using pre-order or level-order which are not sorted
• Converting to array wastes extra space
• Not leveraging BST property for efficiency