What is the main goal when inserting an interval into a sorted list of intervals?
To add the new interval into the list so that the list remains sorted and any overlapping intervals are merged into one.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
How do you know if two intervals overlap?
Two intervals overlap if the start of one interval is less than or equal to the end of the other interval, and vice versa.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In Rust, which data structure is commonly used to represent an interval?
A tuple of two integers, for example (start, end), where start ≤ end.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why is it important to keep the list of intervals sorted when inserting a new interval?
Because it allows efficient merging and ensures the intervals are in order, which simplifies searching and insertion.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of inserting an interval into a sorted list and merging overlaps?
O(n), where n is the number of intervals, because you may need to check and merge intervals linearly.
Click to reveal answer
What should you do if the new interval does not overlap with any existing intervals?
ADiscard the new interval.
BInsert it in the correct sorted position without merging.
CMerge it with the first interval.
DReplace the last interval with the new one.
✗ Incorrect
If there is no overlap, simply insert the new interval where it fits to keep the list sorted.
Which condition indicates two intervals (a, b) and (c, d) overlap?
Ab < c
Ba > d
Ca == d
Db >= c and a <= d
✗ Incorrect
Intervals overlap if the end of the first is at least the start of the second and the start of the first is at most the end of the second.
What is the first step when inserting a new interval into a sorted list?
AFind the position where the new interval should be inserted.
BMerge all intervals first.
CRemove all intervals.
DSort the list again.
✗ Incorrect
You first find where the new interval fits to maintain the sorted order.
After inserting the new interval, what must you do next?
AMerge any overlapping intervals including the new one.
BSort the entire list again.
CDelete the new interval.
DReverse the list.
✗ Incorrect
You merge overlapping intervals to keep the list intervals non-overlapping.
What Rust type is best to represent a list of intervals?
AHashMap<i32, i32>
BString
CVec<(i32, i32)>
DOption<i32>
✗ Incorrect
A vector of tuples is a simple and effective way to store intervals in Rust.
Explain step-by-step how to insert a new interval into a sorted list of intervals and merge overlaps.
Think about how to keep the list sorted and non-overlapping after insertion.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe how to check if two intervals overlap and how to merge them.
Focus on comparing start and end points.
You got /3 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main goal when inserting a new interval into a sorted list of intervals?
easy
A. To remove all intervals that come before the new interval
B. To replace all intervals with the new interval
C. To sort the intervals in descending order
D. To add the new interval and merge any overlapping intervals
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem context
We have a sorted list of intervals and want to insert a new interval without breaking the order.
Step 2: Identify the required operation
We must insert the new interval and merge any intervals that overlap with it to keep the list sorted and non-overlapping.
Final Answer:
To add the new interval and merge any overlapping intervals -> Option D
Quick Check:
Insert and merge intervals = To add the new interval and merge any overlapping intervals [OK]
Hint: Insert and merge overlapping intervals to keep list sorted [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Replacing all intervals instead of merging
Sorting intervals in descending order
Removing intervals before the new one
2. Which Rust syntax correctly declares a vector of intervals where each interval is a tuple of two integers?
easy
A. let intervals: Vec<(i32, i32)> = vec![(1, 3), (6, 9)];
B. let intervals = [(1, 3), (6, 9)];
C. let intervals: Vec<[i32; 2]> = vec![[1, 3], [6, 9]];
D. let intervals: Vec<(int, int)> = vec![(1, 3), (6, 9)];
Solution
Step 1: Identify correct Rust tuple and vector syntax
Rust uses (i32, i32) for tuple of two integers and Vec for vector type.
Step 2: Check each option
let intervals: Vec<(i32, i32)> = vec![(1, 3), (6, 9)]; uses Vec<(i32, i32)> with vec! macro and tuples correctly. let intervals = [(1, 3), (6, 9)]; is an array, not a vector. let intervals: Vec<[i32; 2]> = vec![[1, 3], [6, 9]]; uses arrays inside vector, which is valid but different type. let intervals: Vec<(int, int)> = vec![(1, 3), (6, 9)]; uses 'int' which is invalid in Rust.
Final Answer:
let intervals: Vec<(i32, i32)> = vec![(1, 3), (6, 9)]; -> Option A
Hint: Use Vec<(i32, i32)> and vec! macro for interval list [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using 'int' instead of 'i32'
Confusing arrays and tuples
Not using vec! macro for vectors
3. Given the intervals vec![(1, 3), (6, 9)] and a new interval (2, 5), what is the resulting list after insertion and merging?
medium
A. [(2, 5), (6, 9)]
B. [(1, 3), (2, 5), (6, 9)]
C. [(1, 5), (6, 9)]
D. [(1, 9)]
Solution
Step 1: Insert new interval and find overlaps
The new interval (2, 5) overlaps with (1, 3) because 2 <= 3.
Step 2: Merge overlapping intervals
Merge (1, 3) and (2, 5) into (1, 5). The interval (6, 9) remains unchanged.
Final Answer:
[(1, 5), (6, 9)] -> Option C
Quick Check:
Merged intervals = [(1, 5), (6, 9)] [OK]
Hint: Merge intervals if new start ≤ existing end [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not merging overlapping intervals
Inserting without sorting
Merging all intervals incorrectly
4. Consider this Rust code snippet for inserting an interval into a sorted list:
fn insert_interval(intervals: &mut Vec<(i32, i32)>, new_interval: (i32, i32)) {
let mut i = 0;
while i < intervals.len() {
if intervals[i].1 < new_interval.0 {
i += 1;
} else if intervals[i].0 > new_interval.1 {
intervals.insert(i, new_interval);
return;
} else {
intervals[i].0 = intervals[i].0.min(new_interval.0);
intervals[i].1 = intervals[i].1.max(new_interval.1);
intervals.remove(i + 1);
}
}
intervals.push(new_interval);
}
What is the main bug in this code?
medium
A. It never increments index i inside the else block causing infinite loop
B. It inserts the new interval at the wrong position
C. It removes the wrong interval when merging overlapping intervals
D. It does not handle empty intervals vector
Solution
Step 1: Examine the else branch for merging
The code updates intervals[i] by merging the new interval but never increments the index i inside the else block.
Step 2: Identify infinite loop cause
Because i is not incremented after merging and removing intervals[i+1], the loop can get stuck processing the same index repeatedly, causing an infinite loop.
Final Answer:
It never increments index i inside the else block causing infinite loop -> Option A
Quick Check:
Missing i increment in else block = infinite loop [OK]
Hint: Always increment index after merging to avoid infinite loop [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Forgetting to increment index after removal
Assuming insert always works without checks
Ignoring empty vector edge case
5. You have a sorted list of intervals vec![(1, 2), (3, 5), (6, 7), (8, 10), (12, 16)]. Insert the new interval (4, 8) and return the updated list after merging all overlapping intervals.
hard
A. [(1, 2), (3, 16)]
B. [(1, 2), (3, 10), (12, 16)]
C. [(1, 2), (4, 8), (12, 16)]
D. [(1, 2), (3, 5), (6, 8), (8, 10), (12, 16)]
Solution
Step 1: Identify intervals overlapping with (4, 8)
Intervals (3, 5), (6, 7), and (8, 10) overlap with (4, 8) because their ranges intersect.
Step 2: Merge all overlapping intervals
Merge (3, 5), (6, 7), (8, 10), and (4, 8) into one interval (3, 10). The intervals (1, 2) and (12, 16) remain unchanged.