Vertical Order Traversal of Binary Tree in DSA Python - Time & Space Complexity
We want to understand how the time needed to do vertical order traversal grows as the tree gets bigger.
Specifically, how does the number of nodes affect the work done to group nodes by their vertical columns?
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
from collections import defaultdict, deque
def vertical_order_traversal(root):
if not root:
return []
column_table = defaultdict(list)
queue = deque([(root, 0)])
while queue:
node, column = queue.popleft()
column_table[column].append(node.val)
if node.left:
queue.append((node.left, column - 1))
if node.right:
queue.append((node.right, column + 1))
return [column_table[x] for x in sorted(column_table)]
This code visits each node once, grouping node values by their vertical column index.
Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.
- Primary operation: The while loop that visits each node once.
- How many times: Exactly once per node, so n times for n nodes.
- Sorting the keys of the column table at the end, which depends on the number of columns.
As the number of nodes grows, the traversal visits each node once, so work grows roughly in direct proportion to n.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | About 10 visits plus sorting few columns |
| 100 | About 100 visits plus sorting columns (up to 100) |
| 1000 | About 1000 visits plus sorting columns (up to 1000) |
Pattern observation: The main work grows linearly with nodes, and sorting columns grows with the number of distinct vertical columns, which is at most n.
Time Complexity: O(n log n)
This means the time grows a bit faster than the number of nodes because of sorting the column keys, but the main traversal is linear.
[X] Wrong: "The traversal alone takes O(n log n) because of the queue operations."
[OK] Correct: Each node is added and removed from the queue exactly once, so queue operations are O(n) total, not O(n log n). The sorting step causes the log n factor.
Understanding this complexity helps you explain how tree traversals scale and how sorting affects overall time, a useful skill for many tree-related problems.
"What if we used a balanced tree or heap to keep columns sorted during traversal? How would the time complexity change?"
Practice
Vertical Order Traversal of a binary tree mean?Solution
Step 1: Understand vertical columns in a tree
Vertical order groups nodes by their horizontal distance from the root, called columns.Step 2: Define vertical order traversal
It means collecting nodes column-wise from leftmost to rightmost column.Final Answer:
Nodes are grouped by their vertical columns from left to right -> Option CQuick Check:
Vertical order = group nodes by columns [OK]
- Confusing vertical order with level order traversal
- Thinking vertical order is preorder or inorder traversal
- Mixing rows with columns in traversal
Solution
Step 1: Identify need to group nodes by column
We need to map each column number to the nodes in that column.Step 2: Choose data structure for mapping
A dictionary with column keys and list values is ideal for grouping nodes by column.Final Answer:
Dictionary with column as key and list of nodes as value -> Option AQuick Check:
Use dict for column to nodes mapping [OK]
- Using list only without mapping columns
- Using set which loses order
- Using tuple which is immutable
1 / \ 2 3 / \ \ 4 5 6
Solution
Step 1: Assign column indices to nodes
Root 1 is column 0; left child 2 is -1; right child 3 is +1; 4 is -2; 5 is 0; 6 is +2.Step 2: Group nodes by columns and order top to bottom
Columns: -2:[4], -1:[2], 0:[1,5], 1:[3], 2:[6].Final Answer:
[[4], [2], [1, 5], [3], [6]] -> Option BQuick Check:
Group nodes by column indices [OK]
- Mixing node order within same column
- Ignoring column indices for children
- Grouping nodes by rows instead of columns
def vertical_order(root):
if not root:
return []
col_table = {}
queue = [(root, 0)]
while queue:
node, col = queue.pop()
if col not in col_table:
col_table[col] = []
col_table[col].append(node.val)
if node.left:
queue.append((node.left, col - 1))
if node.right:
queue.append((node.right, col + 1))
return [col_table[x] for x in sorted(col_table)]
Solution
Step 1: Analyze queue usage for BFS
Queue should remove elements from front (pop(0)) for BFS, but pop() removes from end (LIFO).Step 2: Identify impact on traversal order
Using pop() causes DFS-like order, breaking vertical order traversal logic.Final Answer:
Using pop() removes last element, should use pop(0) for BFS -> Option AQuick Check:
Use pop(0) for BFS queue [OK]
- Using pop() instead of pop(0) in BFS queue
- Confusing BFS with DFS traversal order
- Not sorting dictionary keys before output
Solution
Step 1: Understand tie cases in vertical order
When nodes share same column and row, order by node value ascending to maintain consistency.Step 2: Define final ordering rule
Sort nodes first by row (top to bottom), then by value ascending if rows tie.Final Answer:
Sort nodes by their row (top to bottom), then by value ascending if tie -> Option DQuick Check:
Row then value sorting for ties [OK]
- Ignoring row order and sorting only by column
- Not sorting nodes with same position by value
- Outputting nodes in random or insertion order
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
