Search in 2D Matrix in DSA Python - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Search in 2D Matrix

O(n * m)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how the time needed to find a number in a 2D matrix changes as the matrix grows.

How does the search time grow when the matrix gets bigger?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

def search_matrix(matrix, target):
    for row in matrix:
        for num in row:
            if num == target:
                return True
    return False

This code checks each number in the matrix one by one to find the target.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: Checking each element in the matrix.
• How many times: Once for every element in all rows and columns.

How Execution Grows With Input

As the matrix size grows, the number of checks grows with the total number of elements.

Input Size (n x m)	Approx. Operations
10 x 10	100 checks
100 x 100	10,000 checks
1000 x 1000	1,000,000 checks

Pattern observation: The operations grow roughly by the total number of elements, multiplying rows and columns.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n * m)

This means the time to search grows directly with the total number of elements in the matrix.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Since each row is sorted, searching one row is O(log m), so overall search is O(n log m)."

[OK] Correct: This code checks every element without using the sorted property, so it actually looks at all elements, making it O(n * m).

Interview Connect

Understanding how nested loops affect time helps you explain and improve search methods in matrices during interviews.

Self-Check

"What if the matrix rows and columns are sorted and we use a smarter search method? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What is the main idea behind searching an element in a 2D matrix where each row and column is sorted in ascending order?

easy

A. Start from top-right corner and move left or down based on comparison

B. Start from bottom-left corner and move left or down based on comparison

C. Search each element one by one from left to right, top to bottom

D. Use binary search on each row independently

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand matrix properties and use top-right corner

   Each row and column is sorted ascending, so top-right element is largest in its row and smallest in its column. If target is less than current element, move left; if greater, move down.

2. Final Answer:

   Start from top-right corner and move left or down based on comparison -> Option A

3. Quick Check:

   Top-right start = efficient search [OK]

Hint: Start at top-right to decide direction quickly [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Starting from bottom-left without adjusting logic
• Searching all elements linearly
• Using binary search on each row without considering columns

2. Which of the following Python code snippets correctly initializes a 2D matrix named matrix with 3 rows and 4 columns filled with zeros?

easy

A. matrix = [[0]*4]*3

B. matrix = [[0]*3 for _ in range(4)]

C. matrix = [0]*3*[0]*4

D. matrix = [[0 for _ in range(4)] for _ in range(3)]

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand list comprehension for 2D matrix and check options

   Use nested list comprehension [[0 for _ in range(4)] for _ in range(3)] to create independent 3 rows with 4 zeros each. A shares references, B wrong dimensions, C syntax invalid.

2. Final Answer:

   matrix = [[0 for _ in range(4)] for _ in range(3)] -> Option D

3. Quick Check:

   Nested list comprehension = correct matrix init [OK]

Hint: Use nested list comprehension for independent rows [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using [[0]*4]*3 causes shared references
• Multiplying lists incorrectly
• Swapping rows and columns in comprehension

3. What will be the output of the following code?

matrix = [
  [1, 3, 5, 7],
  [10, 11, 16, 20],
  [23, 30, 34, 50]
]
target = 3

row, col = 0, len(matrix[0]) - 1
found = False
while row < len(matrix) and col >= 0:
    if matrix[row][col] == target:
        found = True
        break
    elif matrix[row][col] > target:
        col -= 1
    else:
        row += 1
print(found)

medium

A. IndexError

B. False

C. True

D. SyntaxError

Solution

1. Step 1: Trace starting position and comparisons until target found

   Start at top-right: matrix[0][3] = 7 > 3, move left to col=2; matrix[0][2] = 5 > 3, move left col=1; matrix[0][1] = 3 == target, found = True.

2. Final Answer:

   True -> Option C

3. Quick Check:

   Found target 3 = True [OK]

Hint: Start top-right, move left/down until found or out of bounds [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing row and column indices
• Not updating row or col correctly
• Assuming linear search needed

4. The following code is intended to search for a target in a sorted 2D matrix but does not work correctly. What is the error?

def search_matrix(matrix, target):
    row = 0
    col = len(matrix[0])
    while row < len(matrix) and col >= 0:
        if matrix[row][col] == target:
            return True
        elif matrix[row][col] > target:
            col -= 1
        else:
            row += 1
    return False

medium

A. col should start at len(matrix[0]) - 1, not len(matrix[0])

B. row should start at len(matrix) - 1

C. The while loop condition should use 'or' instead of 'and'

D. The function should return null instead of false

Solution

1. Step 1: Check initial column index and correct start

   col is set to len(matrix[0]) which is out of range (indexing starts at 0). It should be len(matrix[0]) - 1 to start at last valid column index.

2. Final Answer:

   col should start at len(matrix[0]) - 1, not len(matrix[0]) -> Option A

3. Quick Check:

   Index out of range fix = col start - 1 [OK]

Hint: Start col at last index: length minus one [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Starting col at length causes IndexError
• Changing row start incorrectly
• Using wrong loop condition

5. Given a 2D matrix where each row and column is sorted ascending, write a function to count how many times a target number appears. Which approach is most efficient?

hard

A. Traverse entire matrix and count matches (O(m*n))

B. Use binary search on each row and sum counts (O(m*log n))

C. Start from top-right and move left/down counting matches (O(m+n))

D. Flatten matrix to 1D list and use built-in count method

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze time complexities and correct approach

   Full traversal O(m*n), top-right single pass misses duplicates off the path, flatten O(m*n); binary search on each row finds leftmost/rightmost target positions to compute count per row, total O(m*log n) efficient and correct.

2. Final Answer:

   Use binary search on each row and sum counts (O(m*log n)) -> Option B

3. Quick Check:

   Binary per row = efficient count [OK]

Hint: Binary search range in each row [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using full traversal wasting time
• Flattening matrix loses sorted structure
• Top-right movement misses off-path duplicates