Allocate Minimum Pages Binary Search on Answer in DSA Javascript - Time & Space Complexity
We want to find how fast the binary search approach works when allocating minimum pages to students.
How does the number of operations grow as the number of books or pages increases?
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
function isPossible(books, students, maxPages) {
let requiredStudents = 1;
let currentSum = 0;
for (let pages of books) {
if (pages > maxPages) return false;
if (currentSum + pages > maxPages) {
requiredStudents++;
currentSum = pages;
} else {
currentSum += pages;
}
}
return requiredStudents <= students;
}
function allocateMinimumPages(books, students) {
let start = 0;
let end = books.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
let result = end;
while (start <= end) {
let mid = Math.floor((start + end) / 2);
if (isPossible(books, students, mid)) {
result = mid;
end = mid - 1;
} else {
start = mid + 1;
}
}
return result;
}
This code tries to find the smallest maximum number of pages assigned to any student by using binary search on the answer range.
- Primary operation: The
whileloop performing binary search on the range of possible page sums. - How many times: The binary search loop runs about
log(sum of pages)times. - Secondary operation: The
forloop insideisPossiblethat checks if allocation is possible for a given maxPages. - How many times: This loop runs once per binary search iteration, iterating over all books, so
ntimes per check.
As the number of books n grows, the inner check runs n times each binary search step. The binary search runs about log(S) times, where S is the sum of all pages.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 (books) | 10 x log(S) (e.g., 10 x 7 = 70) |
| 100 (books) | 100 x log(S) (e.g., 100 x 14 = 1400) |
| 1000 (books) | 1000 x log(S) (e.g., 1000 x 20 = 20000) |
Pattern observation: The operations grow linearly with the number of books and logarithmically with the total pages sum.
Time Complexity: O(n x log S)
This means the time grows linearly with the number of books and logarithmically with the total pages, making it efficient for large inputs.
[X] Wrong: "The binary search runs in O(log n) because it depends on the number of books."
[OK] Correct: The binary search runs on the range of possible page sums, not the number of books, so it depends on the sum of pages, not just n.
Understanding this time complexity helps you explain how binary search can be applied beyond simple arrays, showing your problem-solving skills with searching answer spaces efficiently.
What if we replaced the linear check in isPossible with a more complex operation? How would that affect the overall time complexity?
Practice
Allocate Minimum Pages problem when using binary search on the answer?Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem goal
The problem aims to divide books among students so that the student with the most pages has as few pages as possible.Step 2: Identify the binary search target
Binary search is used on the maximum pages assigned to any student to find the minimum possible maximum.Final Answer:
To minimize the maximum number of pages assigned to a student -> Option AQuick Check:
Goal = minimize max pages [OK]
- Thinking the goal is to maximize pages
- Confusing sorting with allocation
- Assuming equal pages per student
Solution
Step 1: Determine low boundary
Low should be at least the maximum pages in a single book because no student can get less than that.Step 2: Determine high boundary
High is the sum of all pages, representing the case where one student reads all books.Final Answer:
let low = max pages in a single book, high = sum of all pages; -> Option BQuick Check:
low = max book pages, high = total pages [OK]
- Setting low to 0 which is too low
- Swapping low and high values
- Using arbitrary boundaries
Solution
Step 1: Calculate boundaries
Max single book pages = 40, sum = 100. So low=40, high=100.Step 2: Apply binary search and check feasibility
Mid = 70: Can we allocate so max pages ≤ 70? Yes: [10,20,30] and [40]. Try lower mid.Step 3: Check mid = 55
Allocate: [10,20,30] sum=60 > 55, so no. Increase low to 56.Step 4: Check mid = 60
Allocate: [10,20,30] sum=60 ≤ 60, [40] next. Possible, try lower.Step 5: Check mid = 50
Allocate: [10,20] sum=30 ≤ 50, next [30,40] sum=70 > 50 no. So 50 not possible.Final Answer:
60 -> Option CQuick Check:
Minimum max pages = 60 [OK]
- Choosing sum/2 without checking feasibility
- Ignoring max single book pages
- Misallocating books to students
function isPossible(books, students, maxPages) {
let count = 1, sum = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < books.length; i++) {
sum += books[i];
if (sum > maxPages) {
count++;
sum = books[i];
}
}
return count <= students;
}Solution
Step 1: Analyze sum accumulation
The code adds book pages to sum and resets sum when sum > maxPages, increasing count.Step 2: Check for single book pages exceeding maxPages
There is no check if any single book's pages exceed maxPages, which makes allocation impossible.Final Answer:
It does not check if a single book has pages more than maxPages -> Option AQuick Check:
Missing single book page check [OK]
- Ignoring single book page size check
- Resetting sum incorrectly
- Confusing loop types
Solution
Step 1: Calculate boundaries and try allocations
Max single book = 90, sum = 203. Low=90, High=203.Step 2: Check mid = 146
Allocate: [12,34,67] sum=113 ≤146, [90] sum=90 ≤146. Possible, try lower.Step 3: Check mid = 113
Allocate: [12,34,67] sum=113 ≤113, [90] sum=90 ≤113. Possible, try lower.Step 4: Check mid = 101
Allocate: [12,34,67] sum=113 >101 no. Try [12,34] sum=46 ≤101, next [67,90] sum=157 >101 no. Not possible.Step 5: Conclusion
Minimum max pages = 113. Allocation [12,34,67] and [90] achieves max(113,90)=113, which is the minimum possible maximum, so it is optimal.Final Answer:
Minimum max pages is 113; allocation is optimal -> Option DQuick Check:
Minimum max pages = 113, allocation optimal [OK]
- Assuming 90 is minimum max pages
- Ignoring sum of allocated books
- Not testing all allocation splits
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
