Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Javascriptprogramming~10 mins

Hash Map vs Array vs Linked List for Lookup in DSA Javascript - Interactive Comparison Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to create an empty hash map in JavaScript.

DSA Javascript
const map = [1];
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Anew Map()
B{}
Cnull
D[]
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using an empty array [] instead of an object.
Using null which is not a map.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to find the index of value 5 in an array.

DSA Javascript
const index = arr.[1](5);
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AfindIndex
Bfind
Cincludes
DindexOf
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using find which returns the element, not index.
Using includes which returns true/false.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the linked list search function to return true if value is found.

DSA Javascript
function searchLinkedList(head, val) {
  let current = head;
  while (current !== null) {
    if (current.value === [1]) {
      return true;
    }
    current = current.next;
  }
  return false;
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Avalue
Bval.value
Cval
Dcurrent.val
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Comparing with value which is undefined.
Using val.value which is incorrect.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a hash map from an array of keys with initial value 0.

DSA Javascript
const keys = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
const map = {};
for (let i = 0; i [1] keys.length; i++) {
  map[keys[i]] = [2];
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A<
B<=
C0
D1
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using <= in loop condition causing out of bounds.
Assigning 1 instead of 0 as initial value.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to filter an array for values greater than 10 and create a map with those values as keys and true as values.

DSA Javascript
const arr = [5, 12, 8, 20];
const filteredMap = {};
for (let i = 0; i [1] arr.length; i++) {
  if (arr[i] [2] 10) {
    filteredMap[arr[i]] = [3];
  }
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A<
B>
Ctrue
Dfalse
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using <= in loop causing errors.
Using < instead of > in condition.
Assigning false instead of true.

Practice

(1/5)
1. Which data structure provides the fastest average lookup time for finding an element by key?
easy
A. Hash Map
B. Array
C. Linked List
D. Stack

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand lookup times for each data structure

    Hash Maps use keys to directly access values, giving average O(1) time. Arrays require scanning or index access, O(n) or O(1) if index known. Linked Lists require scanning, O(n).
  2. Step 2: Compare average lookup speeds

    Hash Map is fastest for key-based lookup because it uses hashing. Arrays and Linked Lists are slower for key lookup.
  3. Final Answer:

    Hash Map -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Fastest lookup by key = Hash Map [OK]
Hint: Hash Map uses keys for O(1) lookup, arrays and lists do not [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking arrays are always fastest because of index access
  • Confusing linked list traversal with direct access
  • Assuming stack is a lookup structure
2. Which of the following is the correct way to check if a key exists in a JavaScript Map?
easy
A. map.includes(key)
B. key in map
C. map.contains(key)
D. map.has(key)

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall JavaScript Map methods

    JavaScript Map has a method called has() to check if a key exists.
  2. Step 2: Evaluate each option

    map.has(key) uses map.has(key) which is correct. 'key in map' works for objects, not Map. 'contains' and 'includes' are not Map methods.
  3. Final Answer:

    map.has(key) -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Check key in Map = map.has(key) [OK]
Hint: Use map.has(key) to check keys in JavaScript Map [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using 'in' operator on Map instead of Object
  • Using non-existent methods like contains or includes on Map
  • Confusing array methods with Map methods
3. What will be the output of the following code?
const arr = [10, 20, 30, 40];
const map = new Map();
map.set('a', 1);
map.set('b', 2);

console.log(arr.indexOf(30));
console.log(map.has('b'));
console.log(map.get('c'));
medium
A. 2 true null
B. -1 false undefined
C. 2 true undefined
D. 3 true undefined

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze array indexOf(30)

    Array arr is [10,20,30,40]. indexOf(30) returns 2 because 30 is at index 2.
  2. Step 2: Check map.has('b') and map.get('c')

    map.has('b') is true because 'b' exists. map.get('c') returns undefined because 'c' key does not exist.
  3. Final Answer:

    2 true undefined -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    indexOf(30)=2, has('b')=true, get('c')=undefined [OK]
Hint: indexOf returns index or -1; Map.get returns undefined if key missing [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming map.get returns null for missing keys
  • Confusing array index with value
  • Thinking map.has returns value instead of boolean
4. The following code tries to find if a value exists in a linked list. What is the bug?
class Node {
  constructor(value) {
    this.value = value;
    this.next = null;
  }
}

function contains(head, target) {
  if (head === null) return false;
  while (head.next !== null) {
    if (head.value === target) return true;
    head = head.next;
  }
  return false;
}
medium
A. It misses checking the last node's value
B. It causes infinite loop
C. It throws an error on empty list
D. It incorrectly compares values

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the loop condition

    The loop runs while head.next !== null, so it stops before the last node.
  2. Step 2: Check if last node is checked

    Because loop stops before last node, last node's value is never checked, so target in last node is missed.
  3. Final Answer:

    It misses checking the last node's value -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Loop condition excludes last node check [OK]
Hint: Loop until node is null, not node.next [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using head.next !== null instead of head !== null
  • Assuming last node is checked inside loop
5. You need to frequently check if a user ID exists and also maintain the order of insertion. Which data structure is best suited for this in JavaScript?
hard
A. Array
B. Map
C. Linked List
D. Set

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand requirements

    We need fast existence check and order preservation of user IDs.
  2. Step 2: Compare data structures

    Array preserves order but slow lookup (O(n)). Linked List preserves order but slow lookup (O(n)). Map preserves order and fast lookup by key and stores key-value pairs. Set preserves insertion order and fast lookup for unique values but does not store key-value pairs.
  3. Step 3: Choose best fit

    Map stores key-value pairs, preserves insertion order, and offers O(1) lookup, making it ideal for checking existence and maintaining order.
  4. Final Answer:

    Map -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Fast lookup + order + key-value = Map [OK]
Hint: Use Map for key-value pairs with order and fast lookup [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Choosing Set when key-value pairs are needed
  • Using Array and expecting fast lookup
  • Confusing Linked List order with lookup speed
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard