📖 Scenario: You are working with a list of numbers representing daily temperatures. You want to find pairs of days where the temperature difference is exactly a certain value.
🎯 Goal: Build a program that uses the two pointer technique to find all pairs of numbers in a sorted array whose difference equals a given target.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create a sorted array of integers called temps with exact values
Create an integer variable targetDiff for the difference to find
Use the two pointer technique with variables left and right to find pairs with difference equal to targetDiff
Print all pairs found in the format (left_value, right_value)
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Finding pairs of values with a specific difference is useful in temperature analysis, stock price changes, or matching time intervals.
💼 Career
Two pointer technique is a common pattern in coding interviews and helps solve array problems efficiently.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create the sorted array of temperatures
Create a sorted array of integers called temps with these exact values: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11
DSA Go
Hint
Use temps := []int{1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11} to create the array.
2
Set the target difference
Create an integer variable called targetDiff and set it to 4
DSA Go
Hint
Use targetDiff := 4 to set the difference to find.
3
Use two pointers to find pairs with the target difference
Use two integer variables left and right initialized to 0 and 1 respectively. Use a for loop to move the pointers through temps and find all pairs where temps[right] - temps[left] == targetDiff. Print each pair as fmt.Printf("(%d, %d)\n", temps[left], temps[right]). Increment left or right appropriately to find all pairs without duplicates.
DSA Go
Hint
Use a for loop with left and right pointers. Compare temps[right] - temps[left] with targetDiff and move pointers accordingly.
4
Print all pairs found
Run the program to print all pairs in temps whose difference equals targetDiff. The output should show pairs in the format (left_value, right_value) on separate lines.
DSA Go
Hint
The pairs printed should be (1, 5), (3, 7), (5, 9), and (7, 11) each on a new line.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main idea behind the Two Pointer Technique when used on arrays?
easy
A. Use two arrays to store elements separately.
B. Use one pointer to traverse and another to store values.
C. Use two indices to scan the array from different ends or positions simultaneously.
D. Use two nested loops to compare all pairs of elements.
Solution
Step 1: Understand the technique
The two pointer technique uses two indices or pointers to traverse the array, often starting from different ends or positions.
Step 2: Compare with other options
The other options describe different methods, but only using two indices to scan the array from different ends or positions simultaneously correctly describes the two pointer approach.
Final Answer:
Use two indices to scan the array from different ends or positions simultaneously. -> Option C
Quick Check:
Two pointers move independently to solve problems efficiently [OK]
Hint: Two pointers move from ends or positions to reduce time [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking it uses two separate arrays
Confusing with nested loops approach
Assuming only one pointer moves
2. Which of the following is the correct way to initialize two pointers left and right for an array arr in Go?
easy
A. left := 1; right := len(arr)
B. left := 0; right := len(arr) - 1
C. left := -1; right := len(arr)
D. left := 0; right := len(arr)
Solution
Step 1: Understand array indexing in Go
Arrays and slices in Go are zero-indexed, so the first element is at index 0 and the last at len(arr)-1.
Step 2: Check pointer initialization
Setting left to 0 and right to len(arr)-1 correctly points to the first and last elements respectively.
Final Answer:
left := 0; right := len(arr) - 1 -> Option B
Quick Check:
Start pointers at 0 and last index [OK]
Hint: Start left at 0 and right at last index (len-1) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Setting right to len(arr) causes out-of-range error
Starting left at 1 misses first element
Using negative indices which Go does not support
3. What will be the output of the following Go code snippet?
arr := []int{1, 3, 5, 7, 9}
left, right := 0, len(arr)-1
for left < right {
if arr[left]+arr[right] == 10 {
fmt.Println(left, right)
break
} else if arr[left]+arr[right] < 10 {
left++
} else {
right--
}
}
medium
A. 0 4
B. 1 3
C. 2 3
D. No output
Solution
Step 1: Trace the pointers and sums
Initial pointers: left=0 (arr[0]=1), right=4 (arr[4]=9), sum=10 ==10, so prints 0 4 and breaks.
Step 2: Verify the condition and loop
Actually, sum=1+9=10, so it prints 0 4 and breaks immediately.
Final Answer:
0 4 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Sum 1+9=10 at indices 0 and 4 [OK]
Hint: Check sum at pointers; print indices when sum matches target [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not breaking after first match
Confusing indices with values
Incorrect pointer updates
4. Find the error in the following Go code using two pointers to find if any two numbers sum to 8:
arr := []int{2, 4, 6, 8}
left, right := 0, len(arr)
for left < right {
sum := arr[left] + arr[right]
if sum == 8 {
fmt.Println("Found")
break
} else if sum < 8 {
left++
} else {
right--
}
}
medium
A. The loop condition should be left <= right
B. left pointer should start at 1
C. sum calculation is incorrect
D. right is initialized to len(arr), which is out of range
Solution
Step 1: Check pointer initialization
right is set to len(arr), but valid indices go from 0 to len(arr)-1. This causes out-of-range error when accessing arr[right].
Step 2: Verify other parts
left starting at 0 is correct, loop condition left < right is valid, sum calculation is correct.
Final Answer:
right is initialized to len(arr), which is out of range -> Option D
Quick Check:
Array indices go 0 to len-1, not len [OK]
Hint: Initialize right pointer to len(arr)-1 to avoid out-of-range [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Setting right to len(arr) causes runtime error
Changing loop condition unnecessarily
Misunderstanding array indexing
5. Given a sorted array arr := []int{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}, use the two pointer technique to find all pairs that sum to 10. Which of the following Go code snippets correctly prints all such pairs?
hard
A. left, right := 0, len(arr)-1
for left < right {
sum := arr[left] + arr[right]
if sum == 10 {
fmt.Println(arr[left], arr[right])
left++
right--
} else if sum < 10 {
left++
} else {
right--
}
}
B. left, right := 0, len(arr)-1
for left <= right {
sum := arr[left] + arr[right]
if sum == 10 {
fmt.Println(arr[left], arr[right])
left++
right--
} else if sum < 10 {
left++
} else {
right--
}
}
C. left, right := 0, len(arr)
for left < right {
sum := arr[left] + arr[right]
if sum == 10 {
fmt.Println(arr[left], arr[right])
left++
right--
} else if sum < 10 {
left++
} else {
right--
}
}
D. left, right := 1, len(arr)-1
for left < right {
sum := arr[left] + arr[right]
if sum == 10 {
fmt.Println(arr[left], arr[right])
left++
right--
} else if sum < 10 {
left++
} else {
right--
}
}
Solution
Step 1: Check pointer initialization and loop condition
left, right := 0, len(arr)-1
for left < right {
sum := arr[left] + arr[right]
if sum == 10 {
fmt.Println(arr[left], arr[right])
left++
right--
} else if sum < 10 {
left++
} else {
right--
}
} initializes left=0 and right=len(arr)-1, which are valid indices. Loop runs while left < right to avoid duplicates and out-of-range.
Step 2: Verify pointer updates on sum match
When sum == 10, both pointers move inward to find other pairs. This correctly finds all pairs without repeats.
Final Answer:
left, right := 0, len(arr)-1
for left < right {
sum := arr[left] + arr[right]
if sum == 10 {
fmt.Println(arr[left], arr[right])
left++
right--
} else if sum < 10 {
left++
} else {
right--
}
} -> Option A
Quick Check:
Two pointers move inward, printing pairs when sum matches [OK]
Hint: Move both pointers inward on match to find all pairs [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using right = len(arr) causes index error
Loop condition left <= right prints duplicates
Starting left at 1 misses pairs with first element
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.