What is the main goal of substring search algorithms?
To find the position(s) where a smaller string (pattern) appears within a larger string (text).
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Explain the naive substring search approach.
It checks every position in the text to see if the pattern matches starting there, moving one by one until a match is found or the text ends.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the key idea behind the Knuth-Morris-Pratt (KMP) algorithm?
KMP uses a precomputed table to skip unnecessary comparisons by remembering how the pattern matches itself, so it doesn't restart from the beginning after a mismatch.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How does the Rabin-Karp algorithm speed up substring search?
It uses a hash function to quickly compare the pattern's hash with substrings' hashes in the text, reducing the number of direct character comparisons.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why is preprocessing important in substring search algorithms like KMP?
Preprocessing builds data structures (like prefix tables) that help the algorithm avoid repeating work, making the search faster overall.
Click to reveal answer
Which substring search algorithm uses a prefix table to avoid rechecking characters?
AKnuth-Morris-Pratt (KMP)
BNaive search
CRabin-Karp
DBubble sort
✗ Incorrect
KMP uses a prefix table to skip unnecessary comparisons after mismatches.
What does the Rabin-Karp algorithm use to quickly compare substrings?
AHash values
BPrefix table
CSorting
DRecursion
✗ Incorrect
Rabin-Karp uses hash values to compare substrings efficiently.
In naive substring search, how many positions in the text are checked in the worst case?
AOnly one
BAll positions where pattern fits
CNone
DHalf of the text
✗ Incorrect
Naive search checks every possible position where the pattern can fit.
Which of these is NOT a substring search algorithm?
AKnuth-Morris-Pratt
BNaive search
CRabin-Karp
DQuickSort
✗ Incorrect
QuickSort is a sorting algorithm, not for substring search.
What is the main advantage of using KMP over naive search?
AUses less memory
BUses hashing
CSkips unnecessary comparisons
DWorks only on sorted text
✗ Incorrect
KMP skips unnecessary comparisons using its prefix table.
Describe how the Knuth-Morris-Pratt algorithm improves substring search compared to naive search.
Think about how KMP remembers pattern matches to avoid starting over.
You got /4 concepts.
Explain the role of hashing in the Rabin-Karp substring search algorithm.
Focus on how hashing helps quickly find potential matches.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the strings.Contains(s, substr) function in Go do?
easy
A. Returns the index of substr in s
B. Checks if substr is present anywhere in s
C. Splits s by substr
D. Replaces substr with another string in s
Solution
Step 1: Understand the function purpose
strings.Contains checks if one string is inside another.
Step 2: Check the return type
It returns true if substr is found anywhere in s, otherwise false.
Final Answer:
Checks if substr is present anywhere in s -> Option B
Quick Check:
Contains means presence check = A [OK]
Hint: Contains means checking presence, not position or replacement [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing Contains with Index or Replace functions
Thinking it returns position instead of boolean
Assuming it modifies the original string
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to find the index of substring "go" in string s using Go's standard library?
easy
A. index := strings.Index(s, "go")
B. index := s.IndexOf("go")
C. index := s.find("go")
D. index := strings.Find(s, "go")
Solution
Step 1: Recall Go's strings package functions
The correct function to find substring index is strings.Index.
Step 2: Check syntax correctness
The function is called as strings.Index(s, "go"), returning the first index or -1 if not found.
Final Answer:
index := strings.Index(s, "go") -> Option A
Quick Check:
Index function in strings package = B [OK]
Hint: Use strings.Index for substring position in Go [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using methods on string variable directly (strings are not objects)
Using Python or JavaScript syntax like find or IndexOf
Calling non-existent functions like strings.Find
3. What will be the output of the following Go code?
package main
import (
"fmt"
"strings"
)
func main() {
s := "hello golang"
pos := strings.Index(s, "go")
fmt.Println(pos)
}
medium
A. 6
B. -1
C. 0
D. Error
Solution
Step 1: Understand strings.Index behavior
It returns the first index where substring "go" appears in "hello golang".
Step 2: Find substring position
Counting from 0: h(0) e(1) l(2) l(3) o(4) ' '(5) g(6) o(7)... So "go" starts at index 6.
Final Answer:
6 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Index of "go" in "hello golang" = 6 [OK]
Hint: Count characters from zero to find substring index [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Counting from 1 instead of 0
Assuming substring not found returns 0
Confusing Index with Contains boolean
4. Identify the error in the following Go code snippet for substring search:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"strings"
)
func main() {
s := "golang"
if s.Contains("go") {
fmt.Println("Found")
}
}
medium
A. Incorrect string literal syntax
B. Missing import for fmt package
C. No error, code runs fine
D. strings package has no Contains method on string variable
Solution
Step 1: Check method call on string variable
In Go, strings are not objects and do not have methods like Contains directly.
Step 2: Correct usage of Contains function
The correct call is strings.Contains(s, "go") from the strings package, not s.Contains("go").
Final Answer:
strings package has no Contains method on string variable -> Option D
Quick Check:
Use strings.Contains(s, substr), not s.Contains(substr) [OK]
Hint: Call Contains from strings package, not on string variable [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Calling methods on string variables as if they were objects
Forgetting to import strings package
Assuming Contains returns index
5. Given a list of strings words := []string{"go", "golang", "gopher", "gone"}, which code snippet correctly finds all words containing substring "go" and stores them in result?
hard
A. result := []string{}
for _, w := range words {
if strings.Index(w, "go") > 5 {
result = append(result, w)
}
}
B. var result []string
for i := 0; i < len(words); i++ {
if words[i].Contains("go") {
result = append(result, words[i])
}
}
C. var result []string
for _, w := range words {
if strings.Contains(w, "go") {
result = append(result, w)
}
}
D. result := []string{}
for _, w := range words {
if strings.Index(w, "go") == -1 {
result = append(result, w)
}
}
Solution
Step 1: Identify correct substring check
Use strings.Contains(w, "go") to check if substring exists.
Step 2: Append matching words to result slice
For each word containing "go", append it to result slice.
Final Answer:
var result []string
for _, w := range words {
if strings.Contains(w, "go") {
result = append(result, w)
}
} -> Option C
Quick Check:
Contains + append in loop = D [OK]
Hint: Use strings.Contains inside loop and append matches [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Calling Contains as method on string variable
Appending words that do NOT contain substring
Checking Index == -1 instead of != -1
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.