Spiral Matrix Traversal in DSA Go - Time & Space Complexity
We want to understand how the time needed to traverse a matrix in a spiral grows as the matrix size increases.
How does the number of steps change when the matrix gets bigger?
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
func spiralOrder(matrix [][]int) []int {
if len(matrix) == 0 {
return []int{}
}
result := []int{}
top, bottom := 0, len(matrix)-1
left, right := 0, len(matrix[0])-1
for left <= right && top <= bottom {
for i := left; i <= right; i++ {
result = append(result, matrix[top][i])
}
top++
for i := top; i <= bottom; i++ {
result = append(result, matrix[i][right])
}
right--
if top <= bottom {
for i := right; i >= left; i-- {
result = append(result, matrix[bottom][i])
}
bottom--
}
if left <= right {
for i := bottom; i >= top; i-- {
result = append(result, matrix[i][left])
}
left++
}
}
return result
}
This code collects all elements of a 2D matrix in a spiral order starting from the top-left corner.
Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.
- Primary operation: Visiting each element of the matrix exactly once.
- How many times: Each element is visited once in the spiral traversal loops.
As the matrix size grows, the number of elements to visit grows too.
| Input Size (n x n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 x 10 | 100 visits |
| 100 x 100 | 10,000 visits |
| 1000 x 1000 | 1,000,000 visits |
Pattern observation: The operations grow roughly with the total number of elements, which is the square of the matrix dimension.
Time Complexity: O(n * m)
This means the time grows proportionally to the total number of elements in the matrix, where n and m are the matrix dimensions.
[X] Wrong: "The spiral traversal has nested loops that multiply to O(n²) even for non-square matrices."
[OK] Correct: Each element is visited only once, so the total steps equal the number of elements, not the square of dimensions.
Understanding this traversal helps you think about how to visit all parts of a structure efficiently, a skill useful in many coding problems.
"What if the matrix is not rectangular but jagged (rows have different lengths)? How would the time complexity change?"
Practice
Spiral Matrix Traversal?Solution
Step 1: Understand traversal pattern
Spiral traversal means moving around the edges of the matrix and gradually moving inward in a circular way.Step 2: Compare options with spiral pattern
Only Traverse the matrix in a circular pattern starting from the outer layer moving inward describes moving in a circular pattern from outer to inner layers, which matches spiral traversal.Final Answer:
Traverse the matrix in a circular pattern starting from the outer layer moving inward -> Option AQuick Check:
Spiral traversal = circular outer to inner [OK]
- Confusing spiral with row-wise traversal
- Thinking spiral means diagonal traversal
- Ignoring the inward movement after outer layer
matrix?Solution
Step 1: Identify correct boundary initialization
For spiral traversal, top and left start at 0, bottom and right are last indices (length - 1).Step 2: Check each option
top, bottom := 0, len(matrix)-1; left, right := 0, len(matrix[0])-1 correctly sets top=0, bottom=len(matrix)-1, left=0, right=len(matrix[0])-1. Others have off-by-one or negative values.Final Answer:
top, bottom := 0, len(matrix)-1; left, right := 0, len(matrix[0])-1 -> Option AQuick Check:
Boundaries start at 0 and end at length-1 [OK]
- Using length instead of length-1 for boundaries
- Starting boundaries at 1 instead of 0
- Using negative indices incorrectly
matrix := [][]int{
{1, 2, 3},
{4, 5, 6},
{7, 8, 9},
}
result := []int{}
top, bottom := 0, 2
left, right := 0, 2
for top <= bottom && left <= right {
for i := left; i <= right; i++ {
result = append(result, matrix[top][i])
}
top++
for i := top; i <= bottom; i++ {
result = append(result, matrix[i][right])
}
right--
for i := right; i >= left; i-- {
result = append(result, matrix[bottom][i])
}
bottom--
for i := bottom; i >= top; i-- {
result = append(result, matrix[i][left])
}
left++
}
fmt.Println(result)Solution
Step 1: Trace the spiral traversal steps
Traverse top row left to right: 1,2,3; then right column top to bottom: 6,9; then bottom row right to left: 8,7; then left column bottom to top: 4; then inner layer top row: 5.Step 2: Collect elements in order
Order is [1,2,3,6,9,8,7,4,5].Final Answer:
[1 2 3 6 9 8 7 4 5] -> Option DQuick Check:
Spiral order matches [1 2 3 6 9 8 7 4 5] [OK]
- Not updating boundaries correctly after each loop
- Repeating elements or missing inner elements
- Confusing row and column indices
top, bottom := 0, len(matrix)
left, right := 0, len(matrix[0])
for top <= bottom && left <= right {
for i := left; i <= right; i++ {
fmt.Print(matrix[top][i], " ")
}
top++
// ... rest of traversal
}Solution
Step 1: Check boundary initialization
len(matrix) gives count, but last index is len(matrix)-1. Using len(matrix) causes out-of-range error.Step 2: Confirm loop indices
Loop uses i <= right, so right must be last valid index, not length.Final Answer:
Using len(matrix) and len(matrix[0]) instead of len(matrix)-1 and len(matrix[0])-1 for boundaries -> Option BQuick Check:
Boundaries must be last index = length-1 [OK]
- Setting boundaries to length instead of length-1
- Looping beyond matrix size causing runtime error
- Ignoring zero-based indexing
matrix := [][]int{
{1, 2, 3, 4},
{5, 6, 7, 8},
{9, 10, 11, 12},
}What is the spiral traversal output?
Solution
Step 1: Traverse top row left to right
Elements: 1, 2, 3, 4Step 2: Traverse right column top to bottom (excluding top row)
Elements: 8, 12Step 3: Traverse bottom row right to left (excluding right column)
Elements: 11, 10, 9Step 4: Traverse left column bottom to top (excluding top and bottom rows)
Element: 5Step 5: Traverse inner top row left to right
Elements: 6, 7Final Answer:
[1 2 3 4 8 12 11 10 9 5 6 7] -> Option CQuick Check:
Spiral order matches [1 2 3 4 8 12 11 10 9 5 6 7] [OK]
- Adding extra elements not in matrix
- Mixing row and column traversal order
- Forgetting to shrink boundaries after each layer
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
