Queue elements are from front+1=1 to rear=2, so queue[1]=20 and queue[2]=30.
Printed elements: [20, 30]
Final Answer:
[20, 30] -> Option A
Quick Check:
After dequeue, front=0; elements = queue[1..2] = [20,30] [OK]
Hint: Queue elements lie between front+1 and rear indices [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Printing elements from 0 to rear ignoring front
Not updating front after dequeue
Confusing front and rear indices
4. Given this Go code snippet for dequeue operation in a queue implemented with array:
func dequeue() int {
if front == rear {
fmt.Println("Queue is empty")
return -1
}
front++
return queue[front]
}
What is the main bug in this code?
medium
A. It does not check if queue is full before dequeue
B. It should decrement rear instead of front
C. It increments front before returning element, causing off-by-one error
D. It returns queue[front] after increment, which is correct
Solution
Step 1: Understand dequeue logic
Dequeue removes element at front+1 index. Incrementing front before returning queue[front] is correct to get the next element.
Step 2: Analyze options for bug
It does not check if queue is full before dequeue is unrelated to dequeue.
It increments front before returning element, causing off-by-one error says increment causes off-by-one error but this is standard for queue.
It should decrement rear instead of front is wrong because rear is for enqueue.
It returns queue[front] after increment, which is correct correctly states the code is correct.
Final Answer:
It returns queue[front] after increment, which is correct -> Option D
Quick Check:
Increment front then return element = correct dequeue [OK]
Hint: Dequeue increments front then returns element [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking front should not be incremented before return
Confusing enqueue and dequeue pointers
Checking full condition in dequeue
5. You have a fixed-size queue implemented using an array of size 5 with front and rear indices initialized to -1. After performing these operations:
Since front has moved forward, space at start is free but rear reached end.
Using circular queue logic allows rear to wrap to start and reuse space.
Without circular logic, overflow occurs prematurely.
Final Answer:
Queue overflow occurs; use circular queue logic to reuse space -> Option B
Quick Check:
Overflow at end; circular queue fixes space reuse [OK]
Hint: Use circular queue to avoid overflow when space is free [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring free space at start after dequeues
Assuming array can grow dynamically
Resetting front and rear incorrectly
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.