Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Goprogramming~5 mins

Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal in DSA Go - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Recall & Review
beginner
What is the main goal of the Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal problem?
To find the minimum number of intervals to remove from a list so that the remaining intervals do not overlap.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why do we sort intervals by their end time in the Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal problem?
Sorting by end time helps us greedily select intervals that finish earliest, leaving more room for others and minimizing removals.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In the Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal problem, what does it mean if the start of the current interval is less than the end of the last chosen interval?
It means the current interval overlaps with the last chosen interval and must be removed to avoid overlap.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the common greedy solution for Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal?
O(n log n) due to sorting the intervals, where n is the number of intervals.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Explain the greedy choice in the Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal problem.
Always pick the interval with the earliest end time that does not overlap with previously chosen intervals to maximize the number of intervals kept.
Click to reveal answer
What is the first step in solving the Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal problem?
APick intervals randomly
BSort intervals by their start time
CRemove all intervals
DSort intervals by their end time
If two intervals overlap, what should you do to minimize removals?
ARemove the interval with the later end time
BRemove the interval with the earlier end time
CRemove both intervals
DKeep both intervals
What does the output represent in the Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal problem?
ATotal number of intervals
BMinimum number of intervals to remove
CMaximum number of intervals to remove
DNumber of overlapping intervals
Which data structure is most commonly used to store intervals for this problem?
AArray or slice of pairs
BStack
CQueue
DLinked list
What is the key condition to check if two intervals overlap?
ACurrent interval start > last chosen interval end
BCurrent interval end < last chosen interval start
CCurrent interval start < last chosen interval end
DCurrent interval end > last chosen interval start
Describe the greedy approach to solve the Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal problem.
Think about choosing intervals that finish earliest to keep more intervals.
You got /5 concepts.
    Explain why sorting intervals by their end time helps minimize the number of removals.
    Consider how choosing intervals that end sooner affects the rest.
    You got /4 concepts.

      Practice

      (1/5)
      1. What is the main goal of the Non Overlapping Intervals Minimum Removal problem?
      easy
      A. To remove the minimum number of intervals so that the remaining intervals do not overlap
      B. To find the maximum number of overlapping intervals
      C. To merge all intervals into one big interval
      D. To sort intervals by their start time

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand the problem goal

        The problem asks to remove as few intervals as possible so that no two intervals overlap.
      2. Step 2: Clarify what non-overlapping means

        Non-overlapping means intervals do not share any common points except possibly at the boundary.
      3. Final Answer:

        To remove the minimum number of intervals so that the remaining intervals do not overlap -> Option A
      4. Quick Check:

        Minimum removal = no overlaps [OK]
      Hint: Focus on removing intervals, not merging or counting overlaps [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Thinking the goal is to merge intervals
      • Confusing maximum overlaps with minimum removals
      • Sorting intervals without removing any
      2. Which of the following Go code snippets correctly sorts intervals by their end time for solving the minimum removal problem?
      easy
      A. sort.Slice(intervals, func(i, j int) bool { return intervals[i][0] > intervals[j][0] })
      B. sort.Slice(intervals, func(i, j int) bool { return intervals[i][0] < intervals[j][0] })
      C. sort.Slice(intervals, func(i, j int) bool { return intervals[i][1] < intervals[j][1] })
      D. sort.Slice(intervals, func(i, j int) bool { return intervals[i][1] > intervals[j][1] })

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Identify sorting by end time

        We need to sort intervals by their end time ascending to apply greedy approach.
      2. Step 2: Check the Go sort.Slice syntax

        sort.Slice(intervals, func(i, j int) bool { return intervals[i][1] < intervals[j][1] }) sorts by intervals[i][1] < intervals[j][1], which is correct for end time ascending.
      3. Final Answer:

        sort.Slice(intervals, func(i, j int) bool { return intervals[i][1] < intervals[j][1] }) -> Option C
      4. Quick Check:

        Sort by end time ascending = sort.Slice(intervals, func(i, j int) bool { return intervals[i][1] < intervals[j][1] }) [OK]
      Hint: Sort intervals by end time ascending for greedy removal [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Sorting by start time instead of end time
      • Sorting in descending order by mistake
      • Using wrong slice indices
      3. What is the output of the following Go code snippet that finds the minimum number of intervals to remove?
      package main
      import (
        "fmt"
        "sort"
      )
      func eraseOverlapIntervals(intervals [][]int) int {
        if len(intervals) == 0 {
          return 0
        }
        sort.Slice(intervals, func(i, j int) bool { return intervals[i][1] < intervals[j][1] })
        count := 0
        end := intervals[0][1]
        for i := 1; i < len(intervals); i++ {
          if intervals[i][0] < end {
            count++
          } else {
            end = intervals[i][1]
          }
        }
        return count
      }
      func main() {
        intervals := [][]int{{1,3},{2,4},{3,5}}
        fmt.Println(eraseOverlapIntervals(intervals))
      }
      medium
      A. 2
      B. 1
      C. 0
      D. 3

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Sort intervals by end time

        Sorted intervals: [1,3], [2,4], [3,5]
      2. Step 2: Count overlaps

        Start with end=3. Interval [2,4] starts at 2 < 3, so count=1. Interval [3,5] starts at 3 ≥ 3, update end=5.
      3. Final Answer:

        1 -> Option B
      4. Quick Check:

        One overlap removed = 1 [OK]
      Hint: Sort by end time, count intervals starting before current end [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Not sorting intervals before counting
      • Counting intervals that do not overlap
      • Incorrectly updating end pointer
      4. The following Go code is intended to solve the minimum removal problem but has a bug. What is the bug?
      func eraseOverlapIntervals(intervals [][]int) int {
        if len(intervals) == 0 {
          return 0
        }
        sort.Slice(intervals, func(i, j int) bool { return intervals[i][1] < intervals[j][1] })
        count := 0
        end := intervals[0][1]
        for i := 1; i < len(intervals); i++ {
          if intervals[i][0] < end {
            count++
          } else {
            end = intervals[i][0]
          }
        }
        return count
      }
      medium
      A. Updating end with intervals[i][0] instead of intervals[i][1] causes wrong comparisons
      B. Missing check for empty intervals slice causes runtime error
      C. Sorting by start time instead of end time causes incorrect removal count
      D. Using count++ inside the loop is incorrect; should decrement count

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Check sorting and end update

        Sorting by end time is correct, but updating end incorrectly with intervals[i][0] is wrong.
      2. Step 2: Explain why end update is wrong

        End should track the end time of last non-overlapping interval, so intervals[i][1] is correct.
      3. Final Answer:

        Updating end with intervals[i][0] instead of intervals[i][1] causes wrong comparisons -> Option A
      4. Quick Check:

        End must be interval end, not start [OK]
      Hint: Update end with interval's end time, not start time [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Confusing interval start and end when updating end
      • Ignoring empty slice check
      • Misunderstanding sorting impact
      5. Given intervals [[1,2],[2,3],[3,4],[1,3]], what is the minimum number of intervals to remove to make the rest non-overlapping?
      hard
      A. 2
      B. 3
      C. 0
      D. 1

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Sort intervals by end time

        Sorted intervals: [1,2], [1,3], [2,3], [3,4]
      2. Step 2: Count overlaps and removals

        Start end=2. Interval [1,3] starts at 1 < 2, count=1. Interval [2,3] starts at 2 ≥ 2, update end=3. Interval [3,4] starts at 3 ≥ 3, update end=4.
      3. Final Answer:

        1 -> Option D
      4. Quick Check:

        One removal needed = 1 [OK]
      Hint: Sort by end, remove intervals starting before current end [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Not sorting intervals before counting
      • Removing more intervals than needed
      • Miscounting overlaps with boundary intervals
      Recommended

      Ready to prove it?

      Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

      10 questions~5 mineasy hard