Intersection Point of Two Linked Lists in DSA Go - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Intersection Point of Two Linked Lists

O(m + n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to know how long it takes to find where two linked lists meet.

How does the time grow when the lists get longer?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode {
    if headA == nil || headB == nil {
        return nil
    }
    a, b := headA, headB
    for a != b {
        if a == nil {
            a = headB
        } else {
            a = a.Next
        }
        if b == nil {
            b = headA
        } else {
            b = b.Next
        }
    }
    return a
}
    

This code finds the node where two linked lists meet by switching pointers.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: Moving pointers through each list node.
• How many times: Each pointer moves at most twice through the lists.

How Execution Grows With Input

As the lists get longer, the pointers travel through all nodes at most twice.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	About 20 pointer moves
100	About 200 pointer moves
1000	About 2000 pointer moves

Pattern observation: Operations grow roughly twice the total length of both lists combined.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(m + n)

This means the time grows linearly with the total number of nodes in both lists.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "The loop runs forever if there is no intersection."

[OK] Correct: The pointers switch lists and eventually both become nil, ending the loop.

Interview Connect

Understanding this helps you show how to handle linked lists smartly and efficiently in real problems.

Self-Check

"What if we used extra memory to store visited nodes? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What does the term intersection point mean in the context of two singly linked lists?

easy

A. The last node of the shorter linked list.

B. The node where the values of both lists are equal but references differ.

C. The first node of the longer linked list.

D. The node where both linked lists share the same reference, meaning they merge.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand linked list nodes and references

   Each node in a linked list has a reference (pointer) to the next node. Two lists intersect if they share the same node reference at some point.

2. Step 2: Define intersection point

   The intersection point is the node where both lists merge and continue as one, sharing the same reference.

3. Final Answer:

   The node where both linked lists share the same reference, meaning they merge. -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Intersection means shared node reference [OK]

Hint: Intersection means same node reference, not just same value [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing same value with same reference
• Thinking intersection is at the start of lists
• Assuming intersection means equal length

2. Which of the following Go function signatures correctly represents a function to find the intersection point of two singly linked lists?

easy

A. func getIntersectionNode(headA ListNode, headB *ListNode) *ListNode

B. func getIntersectionNode(headA ListNode, headB ListNode) ListNode

C. func getIntersectionNode(headA *ListNode, headB *ListNode) *ListNode

D. func getIntersectionNode(headA *ListNode, headB *ListNode) int

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand Go pointer usage for linked lists

   Linked list nodes are usually handled via pointers to allow traversal and modification. So parameters should be pointers.

2. Step 2: Check return type for intersection node

   The function should return a pointer to the intersecting node or nil if none, so return type is *ListNode.

3. Final Answer:

   func getIntersectionNode(headA *ListNode, headB *ListNode) *ListNode -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Use pointers for nodes and return pointer [OK]

Hint: Use pointers for linked list nodes in Go function signatures [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Passing nodes by value instead of pointer
• Returning wrong type like int instead of node pointer
• Mixing pointer and non-pointer parameters

3. Given the following Go code snippet, what will be printed?

type ListNode struct {
    Val  int
    Next *ListNode
}

func main() {
    common := &ListNode{Val: 8, Next: &ListNode{Val: 10, Next: nil}}
    listA := &ListNode{Val: 3, Next: &ListNode{Val: 7, Next: common}}
    listB := &ListNode{Val: 99, Next: &ListNode{Val: 1, Next: common}}

    intersection := getIntersectionNode(listA, listB)
    if intersection != nil {
        fmt.Println(intersection.Val)
    } else {
        fmt.Println(-1)
    }
}

func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode {
    nodes := make(map[*ListNode]bool)
    for headA != nil {
        nodes[headA] = true
        headA = headA.Next
    }
    for headB != nil {
        if nodes[headB] {
            return headB
        }
        headB = headB.Next
    }
    return nil
}

medium

A. 10

B. 8

C. -1

D. 3

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the linked lists and common node

   listA: 3 -> 7 -> 8 -> 10 listB: 99 -> 1 -> 8 -> 10 The common node starts at value 8.

2. Step 2: Trace getIntersectionNode function

   The function stores all nodes of listA in a map. Then it checks nodes of listB. The first node in listB found in map is the intersection: node with value 8.

3. Final Answer:

   8 -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   First shared node value = 8 [OK]

Hint: Map nodes of first list, check second list for first match [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Printing value of last node instead of intersection
• Confusing node value with node reference
• Returning nil when intersection exists

4. The following Go function is intended to find the intersection point of two linked lists but has a bug. What is the bug?

func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode {
    lengthA, lengthB := 0, 0
    currA, currB := headA, headB

    for currA != nil {
        lengthA++
        currA = currA.Next
    }
    for currB != nil {
        lengthB++
        currB = currB.Next
    }

    diff := lengthA - lengthB
    if diff < 0 {
        diff = -diff
        for i := 0; i < diff; i++ {
            headA = headA.Next
        }
    } else {
        for i := 0; i < diff; i++ {
            headB = headB.Next
        }
    }

    for headA != nil && headB != nil {
        if headA == headB {
            return headA
        }
        headA = headA.Next
        headB = headB.Next
    }
    return nil
}

medium

A. The function incorrectly advances headA when diff < 0 instead of headB.

B. The function does not handle the case when one list is empty.

C. The pointers headA and headB are advanced incorrectly when diff < 0.

D. The diff calculation should be absolute value before advancing pointers.

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze pointer advancement logic

   If lengthA < lengthB (diff < 0), the shorter list is A, so we should advance headB to align lengths, but code advances headA incorrectly.

2. Step 2: Identify correct pointer to advance

   When diff < 0, advance headB by |diff| steps, else advance headA. The code does the opposite.

3. Final Answer:

   The function incorrectly advances headA when diff < 0 instead of headB. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Advance pointer of longer list, not shorter [OK]

Hint: Advance pointer of longer list by difference in length [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Advancing pointer of shorter list instead of longer
• Not taking absolute value of length difference
• Ignoring empty list cases

5. You have two singly linked lists that may or may not intersect. Write a Go function that returns the intersection node using the two-pointer technique without extra space. Which of the following code snippets correctly implements this approach?

hard

A. func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode {
if headA == nil || headB == nil {
return nil
}
pA, pB := headA, headB
for pA != pB {
if pA == nil {
pA = headB
} else {
pA = pA.Next
}
if pB == nil {
pB = headA
} else {
pB = pB.Next
}
}
return pA
}

B. func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode {
visited := make(map[*ListNode]bool)
for headA != nil {
visited[headA] = true
headA = headA.Next
}
for headB != nil {
if visited[headB] {
return headB
}
headB = headB.Next
}
return nil
}

C. func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode {
lengthA, lengthB := 0, 0
currA, currB := headA, headB
for currA != nil {
lengthA++
currA = currA.Next
}
for currB != nil {
lengthB++
currB = currB.Next
}
diff := lengthA - lengthB
if diff < 0 {
diff = -diff
for i := 0; i < diff; i++ {
headA = headA.Next
}
} else {
for i := 0; i < diff; i++ {
headB = headB.Next
}
}
for headA != nil && headB != nil {
if headA == headB {
return headA
}
headA = headA.Next
headB = headB.Next
}
return nil
}

D. func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode {
for headA != nil {
for headB != nil {
if headA == headB {
return headA
}
headB = headB.Next
}
headA = headA.Next
}
return nil
}

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand two-pointer technique

   Two pointers start at heads of each list. When a pointer reaches end, it switches to the other list's head. They meet at intersection or nil.

2. Step 2: Analyze code snippets

   func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode { if headA == nil || headB == nil { return nil } pA, pB := headA, headB for pA != pB { if pA == nil { pA = headB } else { pA = pA.Next } if pB == nil { pB = headA } else { pB = pB.Next } } return pA } correctly implements this logic with pointer switching and loop until pointers meet. func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode { visited := make(map[*ListNode]bool) for headA != nil { visited[headA] = true headA = headA.Next } for headB != nil { if visited[headB] { return headB } headB = headB.Next } return nil } uses extra space (map). func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode { lengthA, lengthB := 0, 0 currA, currB := headA, headB for currA != nil { lengthA++ currA = currA.Next } for currB != nil { lengthB++ currB = currB.Next } diff := lengthA - lengthB if diff < 0 { diff = -diff for i := 0; i < diff; i++ { headA = headA.Next } } else { for i := 0; i < diff; i++ { headB = headB.Next } } for headA != nil && headB != nil { if headA == headB { return headA } headA = headA.Next headB = headB.Next } return nil } uses length difference method. func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode { for headA != nil { for headB != nil { if headA == headB { return headA } headB = headB.Next } headA = headA.Next } return nil } is inefficient nested loops.

3. Final Answer:

   Option A code snippet correctly implements two-pointer technique without extra space. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Two-pointer switch method = func getIntersectionNode(headA, headB *ListNode) *ListNode { if headA == nil || headB == nil { return nil } pA, pB := headA, headB for pA != pB { if pA == nil { pA = headB } else { pA = pA.Next } if pB == nil { pB = headA } else { pB = pB.Next } } return pA } [OK]

Hint: Switch pointers to other list head when reaching end [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using extra space instead of two-pointer method
• Not switching pointers after reaching list end
• Using nested loops causing O(n^2) time