What if you could add new time slots without worrying about overlaps or order?
Why Insert Interval into Sorted List in DSA Go?
Imagine you have a list of booked meeting times sorted by start time. Now, you want to add a new meeting without messing up the order or overlapping times.
Manually checking where to insert the new meeting and adjusting overlapping times is slow and error-prone. You might miss overlaps or insert in the wrong place, causing confusion.
Using the Insert Interval method, you can automatically find the right spot and merge overlapping intervals smoothly, keeping the list sorted and clean.
intervals := [][]int{{1,3},{6,9}}
newInterval := []int{2,5}
// Manually check and merge intervals one by oneintervals := [][]int{{1,3},{6,9}}
newInterval := []int{2,5}
intervals = insertInterval(intervals, newInterval)This lets you efficiently manage and update schedules or ranges without errors or extra effort.
Adding a new appointment to a calendar app that automatically adjusts overlapping events and keeps the schedule tidy.
Manual insertion and merging of intervals is slow and error-prone.
Insert Interval automates finding the right place and merging overlaps.
It keeps interval lists sorted and clean for easy management.
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem context
The list contains sorted, non-overlapping intervals. Inserting a new interval may cause overlaps.Step 2: Determine the correct action
We must merge any overlapping intervals with the new one to keep the list sorted and non-overlapping.Final Answer:
To merge overlapping intervals and keep the list sorted -> Option AQuick Check:
Insert interval = merge and keep sorted [OK]
- Just appending without merging
- Removing intervals incorrectly
- Sorting again after insertion
Solution
Step 1: Identify slice of slices syntax
In Go, [][]int means a slice of slices of int, suitable for intervals like [start, end].Step 2: Check each option
intervals := [][]int{{1, 3}, {6, 9}} correctly uses [][]int with nested slices for intervals. intervals := [][2]int{{1, 3}, {6, 9}} uses array [2]int which is valid but less common. intervals := []int{1, 3, 6, 9} is a flat slice, not intervals. intervals := [][]int{1, 3, 6, 9} is invalid syntax.Final Answer:
intervals := [][]int{{1, 3}, {6, 9}} -> Option DQuick Check:
Slice of slices = [][]int{{start,end}} [OK]
- Using flat []int instead of [][]int
- Incorrect array vs slice syntax
- Missing curly braces for nested slices
intervals := [][]int{{1, 2}, {6, 9}}
newInterval := []int{2, 5}
// After insertion and merging
result := [][]int{{1, 5}, {6, 9}}
fmt.Println(result)Solution
Step 1: Insert and check overlap
New interval [2,5] overlaps with [1,2] because 2 <= 2. Merge them to [1,5].Step 2: Keep other intervals
[6,9] does not overlap with [1,5], so it stays as is.Final Answer:
[[1 5] [6 9]] -> Option CQuick Check:
Merged intervals = [[1 5] [6 9]] [OK]
- Not merging overlapping intervals
- Appending new interval without sorting
- Incorrect interval order
func insert(intervals [][]int, newInterval []int) [][]int {
var result [][]int
for _, interval := range intervals {
if interval[1] < newInterval[0] {
result = append(result, interval)
} else if interval[0] > newInterval[1] {
result = append(result, newInterval)
newInterval = interval
} else {
newInterval[0] = min(newInterval[0], interval[0])
newInterval[1] = max(newInterval[1], interval[1])
}
}
result = append(result, newInterval)
return result
}Solution
Step 1: Analyze appending logic
When interval[0] > newInterval[1], newInterval is appended and then replaced by interval. This can cause multiple appends of newInterval.Step 2: Identify duplicate insertion
Because newInterval is appended inside the loop multiple times, duplicates appear in result.Final Answer:
Appending newInterval multiple times causes duplicates -> Option AQuick Check:
Multiple appends = duplicates [OK]
- Appending inside loop multiple times
- Not updating newInterval boundaries
- Forgetting to return result
Solution
Step 1: Merge [2,7] with overlapping intervals
[2,7] overlaps with [1,3] and [6,9]. Merge all three intervals into one covering from min start 1 to max end 9.Step 2: Final merged interval
The merged interval is [1,9], replacing the original two intervals.Final Answer:
[[1,9]] -> Option BQuick Check:
Merge all overlapping = [[1,9]] [OK]
- Partial merges leaving overlaps
- Appending without merging
- Incorrect interval boundaries
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
