Why Find the Only Non Repeating Element Using XOR in DSA Go?

The Big Idea

Discover how a simple trick can instantly find the odd one out in a crowd!

The Scenario

Imagine you have a box of socks where every sock has a matching pair except one. You want to find that single sock without checking each pair one by one.

The Problem

Checking each sock manually to find the one without a pair takes a lot of time and can easily cause mistakes, especially if the box is large.

The Solution

Using XOR, you can quickly find the single sock without pairs by combining all socks. XOR cancels out pairs automatically, leaving only the unmatched sock.

Before vs After

✗ Before

for i := 0; i < len(socks); i++ {
    count := 0
    for j := 0; j < len(socks); j++ {
        if socks[i] == socks[j] {
            count++
        }
    }
    if count == 1 {
        return socks[i]
    }
}

✓ After

result := 0
for _, sock := range socks {
    result ^= sock
}
return result

What It Enables

This method lets you find the unique item in a group instantly, no matter how big the group is.

Real Life Example

Finding the single faulty device ID in a list where all other devices have duplicates, without checking each ID twice.

Key Takeaways

Manual checking is slow and error-prone.

XOR cancels pairs and reveals the unique element.

Efficient for large data sets with one unique item.

Practice

1. What does the XOR operation do when applied between two identical numbers?

easy

A. It returns the sum of the numbers

B. It returns 0

C. It returns 1

D. It returns the number itself

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand XOR property for identical numbers

   XOR of a number with itself always results in 0 because bits cancel out.

2. Step 2: Apply this property to the question

   Since the two identical numbers cancel out, the result is 0.

3. Final Answer:

   It returns 0 -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   n XOR n = 0 [OK]

Hint: XOR of same numbers always zeroes out [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking XOR returns the number itself
• Confusing XOR with OR operation
• Assuming XOR sums numbers

2. Which of the following Go code snippets correctly initializes a variable to store XOR results for an integer slice named nums?

easy

A. var result int = 0

B. result := []int{}

C. var result string = ""

D. result := make(map[int]int)

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify the correct type for XOR accumulation

   XOR operates on integers, so the variable must be an integer initialized to 0.

2. Step 2: Check each option

   var result int = 0 initializes an integer variable to 0, suitable for XOR operations. Others use wrong types or data structures.

3. Final Answer:

   var result int = 0 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Integer zero initialization for XOR [OK]

Hint: XOR needs an integer variable initialized to zero [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using slice or map instead of int
• Initializing with empty string
• Not initializing variable

3. What is the output of the following Go code?

package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
 nums := []int{2, 3, 2, 4, 3}
 result := 0
 for _, num := range nums {
  result ^= num
 }
 fmt.Println(result)
}

medium

A. 2

B. 3

C. 4

D. 0

Solution

1. Step 1: XOR all elements in the slice

   Calculate XOR stepwise: 0^2=2, 2^3=1, 1^2=3, 3^4=7, 7^3=4.

2. Step 2: Identify the non-repeating element

   The final XOR result is 4, which is the only number appearing once.

3. Final Answer:

   4 -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   XOR cancels duplicates, leaves 4 [OK]

Hint: XOR duplicates cancel, leftover is unique [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Adding numbers instead of XOR
• Miscomputing XOR steps
• Ignoring duplicates

4. Identify the error in this Go code snippet that tries to find the only non-repeating element using XOR:

package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
 nums := []int{5, 1, 5, 2, 1}
 var result int
 for i := 0; i <= len(nums); i++ {
  result ^= nums[i]
 }
 fmt.Println(result)
}

medium

A. Loop condition should be i < len(nums), not i <= len(nums)

B. Variable 'result' should be initialized to 1 instead of 0

C. The XOR operator '^=' is invalid in Go

D. The slice 'nums' should be declared as an array

Solution

1. Step 1: Check loop boundary condition

   The loop runs from i=0 to i<=len(nums), which causes out-of-range access at i=len(nums).

2. Step 2: Correct the loop condition

   Change condition to i < len(nums) to avoid index out of range error.

3. Final Answer:

   Loop condition should be i < len(nums), not i <= len(nums) -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Index out of range fixed by loop condition [OK]

Hint: Loop index must be less than length, not equal [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using <= instead of <
• Initializing result incorrectly
• Misunderstanding XOR operator

5. Given an array where every element appears twice except one element which appears once, how can you find the unique element using XOR in Go? Consider the array nums := []int{7, 9, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10}. What is the unique element?

hard

A. 7

B. 9

C. 10

D. 8

Solution

1. Step 1: XOR all elements in the array

   Calculate XOR stepwise: 0^7=7, 7^9=14, 14^7=9, 9^8=1, 1^9=8, 8^10=2, 2^10=8.

2. Step 2: Identify the unique element

   The final XOR result is 8, which appears only once in the array.

3. Final Answer:

   8 -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Duplicates cancel, unique is 8 [OK]

Hint: XOR all elements; duplicates vanish, unique remains [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Adding numbers instead of XOR
• Forgetting to initialize result to zero
• Misreading array elements