📖 Scenario: You are building a simple doubly linked list to keep track of tasks in a to-do list app. Each task has a name and links to the previous and next tasks.
🎯 Goal: Create the basic structure of a doubly linked list node in Go. Define the node with fields for the task name, and pointers to the previous and next nodes.
📋 What You'll Learn
Define a struct called Node with three fields: task (string), prev (*Node), and next (*Node).
Create a variable called head of type *Node and set it to nil.
Create a variable called tail of type *Node and set it to nil.
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Doubly linked lists are used in applications like task managers, music playlists, and undo/redo features where you need to move forward and backward through items.
💼 Career
Understanding linked list structures is fundamental for software developers working with data organization, memory management, and building efficient data-driven applications.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Define the Node struct
Define a struct called Node with three fields: task of type string, prev of type *Node, and next of type *Node.
DSA Go
Hint
Use type Node struct { ... } to define the node. The prev and next fields should be pointers to Node.
2
Create head and tail pointers
Create two variables called head and tail of type *Node and set both to nil.
DSA Go
Hint
Use var head *Node = nil and var tail *Node = nil to create the pointers.
3
Create a new node instance
Create a variable called firstNode and assign it a new Node with the task field set to "Buy groceries", and both prev and next set to nil.
DSA Go
Hint
Use &Node{task: "Buy groceries", prev: nil, next: nil} to create the node.
4
Print the first node's task
Write a main function that prints the task field of firstNode.
DSA Go
Hint
Use fmt.Println(firstNode.task) inside main to print the task.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of the prev pointer in a doubly linked list node?
easy
A. To point to the previous node in the list
B. To point to the next node in the list
C. To store the data value of the node
D. To indicate the end of the list
Solution
Step 1: Understand the role of pointers in doubly linked list nodes
Each node in a doubly linked list has two pointers: one to the next node and one to the previous node.
Step 2: Identify the function of the prev pointer
The prev pointer specifically points to the node that comes before the current node in the list.
Final Answer:
To point to the previous node in the list -> Option A
Quick Check:
prev pointer = previous node [OK]
Hint: Prev pointer always links backward to previous node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing prev with next pointer
Thinking prev stores data
Assuming prev marks list end
2. Which of the following is the correct way to define a doubly linked list node struct in Go?
easy
A. type Node struct { data int; next *Node; prev int }
B. type Node struct { data int; next Node; prev Node }
C. type Node struct { data int; next *Node; prev *Node }
D. type Node struct { data int; next *int; prev *int }
Solution
Step 1: Recall Go struct pointer usage for linked nodes
In Go, linked list nodes use pointers to other nodes to link them, so next and prev must be pointers to Node.
Step 2: Check each option for correct pointer types
type Node struct { data int; next *Node; prev *Node } uses *Node for both next and prev, which is correct. type Node struct { data int; next Node; prev Node } uses non-pointer types, which is incorrect. type Node struct { data int; next *int; prev *int } uses pointers to int, which is wrong. type Node struct { data int; next *Node; prev int } mixes pointer and int, which is invalid.
Final Answer:
type Node struct { data int; next *Node; prev *Node } -> Option C
Quick Check:
Pointers to Node = correct struct [OK]
Hint: Use *Node type for next and prev pointers [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using non-pointer types for next or prev
Using wrong pointer types like *int
Mixing pointer and non-pointer fields
3. Given the following Go code for a doubly linked list node insertion, what will be the printed list after inserting nodes with values 1, 2, and 3 at the end?
type Node struct {
data int
next *Node
prev *Node
}
func printList(head *Node) {
for head != nil {
fmt.Print(head.data, " ")
head = head.next
}
fmt.Println()
}
func main() {
var head *Node
head = &Node{data: 1}
second := &Node{data: 2}
third := &Node{data: 3}
head.next = second
second.prev = head
second.next = third
third.prev = second
printList(head)
}
medium
A. 1 3 2
B. 1 2 3
C. 3 2 1
D. 2 1 3
Solution
Step 1: Understand the node linking order
The nodes are linked as 1 -> 2 -> 3 with proper next and prev pointers.
Step 2: Trace the printList function
Starting from head (node with data 1), the function prints 1, moves to next (2), prints 2, moves to next (3), prints 3, then stops at nil.
Final Answer:
1 2 3 -> Option B
Quick Check:
Traversal from head prints 1 2 3 [OK]
Hint: Traverse from head using next pointers to print list [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing prev and next pointers during traversal
Printing in reverse order mistakenly
Not linking nodes correctly
4. Identify the error in the following Go code snippet for inserting a new node at the beginning of a doubly linked list:
func insertAtBeginning(head *Node, data int) *Node {
newNode := &Node{data: data}
newNode.next = head
head.prev = newNode
return newNode
}
medium
A. Missing check if head is nil before setting head.prev
B. newNode.prev should point to head
C. Function should not return *Node
D. newNode.next should be nil
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the code for edge cases
The code sets head.prev = newNode without checking if head is nil, which causes a runtime error if the list is empty.
Step 2: Identify the missing nil check
Before setting head.prev, the code should check if head != nil to avoid dereferencing nil pointer.
Final Answer:
Missing check if head is nil before setting head.prev -> Option A
Quick Check:
Check for nil head before accessing prev [OK]
Hint: Always check if head is nil before accessing its fields [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not checking for nil head causing runtime panic
Confusing prev and next pointers
Incorrect return type assumptions
5. You want to implement a function in Go that reverses a doubly linked list by swapping the next and prev pointers of each node. Which of the following code snippets correctly performs this reversal?
hard
A. func reverse(head *Node) *Node {
current := head
var temp *Node
for current != nil {
temp = current.next
current.next = current.prev
current.prev = temp
current = current.prev
}
if temp != nil {
head = temp.prev
}
return head
}
B. func reverse(head *Node) *Node {
current := head
for current != nil {
current.next, current.prev = current.prev, current.next
current = current.next
}
return head
}
C. func reverse(head *Node) *Node {
current := head
var prev *Node
for current != nil {
prev = current.prev
current.prev = current.next
current.next = prev
current = current.next
}
return prev
}
D. func reverse(head *Node) *Node {
current := head
var temp *Node
for current != nil {
temp = current.prev
current.prev = current.next
current.next = temp
current = current.prev
}
if temp != nil {
head = temp.prev
}
return head
}
Solution
Step 1: Understand the reversal logic for doubly linked list
Reversing means swapping next and prev pointers for each node, then moving to the original next node (which becomes prev after swap).
Step 2: Analyze each code snippet for correctness
func reverse(head *Node) *Node {
current := head
var temp *Node
for current != nil {
temp = current.prev
current.prev = current.next
current.next = temp
current = current.prev
}
if temp != nil {
head = temp.prev
}
return head
} correctly swaps pointers and moves current to current.prev (original next). It updates head to the last processed node. func reverse(head *Node) *Node {
current := head
var temp *Node
for current != nil {
temp = current.next
current.next = current.prev
current.prev = temp
current = current.prev
}
if temp != nil {
head = temp.prev
}
return head
} swaps pointers but moves current incorrectly and updates head wrongly.
Final Answer:
func reverse(head *Node) *Node {
current := head
var temp *Node
for current != nil {
temp = current.prev
current.prev = current.next
current.next = temp
current = current.prev
}
if temp != nil {
head = temp.prev
}
return head
} -> Option D
Quick Check:
Swap next and prev, move current to original next [OK]
Hint: Swap next and prev, move to original next (now prev) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not updating head to new first node
Moving current pointer incorrectly after swap
Returning wrong node as head
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.