What does 'Delete Node at Beginning' mean in a linked list?
It means removing the first node of the linked list and making the second node the new head.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In Go, what is the first step to delete the first node of a singly linked list?
Set the head pointer to point to the second node (head.Next).
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why must we check if the linked list is empty before deleting the first node?
Because if the list is empty (head is nil), there is no node to delete and trying to delete will cause errors.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What happens to the deleted node in Go after deleting the first node?
If no references remain, Go's garbage collector automatically frees the memory of the deleted node.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Show the Go code snippet to delete the first node of a singly linked list named 'head'.
if head != nil {
head = head.Next
}
Click to reveal answer
What should you do first to delete the first node of a linked list?
ACreate a new node
BSet head to nil
CTraverse to the last node
DSet head to head.next
✗ Incorrect
To delete the first node, you move the head pointer to the second node (head.next).
What happens if you try to delete the first node when the list is empty?
ANothing happens, safe to do
BProgram crashes or error occurs
CDeletes the last node instead
DCreates a new node
✗ Incorrect
If the list is empty (head is nil), deleting the first node does nothing and is safe.
In Go, who frees the memory of the deleted node after removing it from the list?
AProgrammer manually frees it
BGo's garbage collector
COperating system immediately
DIt never frees memory
✗ Incorrect
Go uses garbage collection to free memory of unreachable nodes automatically.
After deleting the first node, what is the new head of the list?
AThe second node
BNil always
CThe last node
DThe original first node
✗ Incorrect
The second node becomes the new head after deleting the first node.
Which of these is the correct Go code to delete the first node?
Ahead = nil.next
Bhead.next = head
Chead = head.next
Dhead = head.prev
✗ Incorrect
Setting head to head.next moves the head pointer to the second node, deleting the first.
Explain step-by-step how to delete the first node of a singly linked list in Go.
Think about what happens to the head pointer and memory.
You got /4 concepts.
Why is it important to handle the empty list case when deleting the first node?
Consider what happens if you try to access head.Next when head is nil.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What happens when you delete the first node in a singly linked list?
easy
A. The head pointer moves to the second node
B. The last node is deleted
C. The list becomes empty regardless of nodes
D. The middle node is deleted
Solution
Step 1: Understand the head pointer role
The head pointer points to the first node in the list.
Step 2: Effect of deleting the first node
Deleting the first node means moving the head pointer to the next node, which becomes the new first node.
Final Answer:
The head pointer moves to the second node -> Option A
Quick Check:
Deleting first node updates head = next node [OK]
Hint: Deleting first node means head points to next node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking last node is deleted
Assuming list becomes empty always
Deleting middle node by mistake
2. Which of the following Go code snippets correctly deletes the first node of a singly linked list with head pointer head?
easy
A. head.next = nil
B. head.next = head
C. head = nil.next
D. head = head.next
Solution
Step 1: Understand pointer update to delete first node
To delete the first node, head must point to the second node, which is head.next.
Step 2: Check each option for correctness
head = head.next correctly assigns head = head.next. Others either assign incorrectly or cause errors.
Final Answer:
head = head.next -> Option D
Quick Check:
head = head.next deletes first node [OK]
Hint: Assign head to head.next to delete first node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assigning head.next to head (wrong direction)
Using nil.next which causes error
Setting head.next to nil deletes wrong node
3. Given the following Go code for a singly linked list, what will be printed after deleting the first node?
package main
import "fmt"
type Node struct {
value int
next *Node
}
func main() {
head := &Node{value: 1}
head.next = &Node{value: 2}
head.next.next = &Node{value: 3}
// Delete first node
head = head.next
// Print list
current := head
for current != nil {
fmt.Print(current.value, " -> ")
current = current.next
}
fmt.Print("null")
}
medium
A. 2 -> 3 -> null
B. 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> null
C. 3 -> null
D. null
Solution
Step 1: Initial list nodes and values
The list starts as 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> null.
Step 2: Deleting first node by head = head.next
Head moves from node with value 1 to node with value 2, so list becomes 2 -> 3 -> null.
Final Answer:
2 -> 3 -> null -> Option A
Quick Check:
After deletion, list starts at second node [OK]
Hint: After deletion, list starts from second node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Printing original list without deletion
Assuming first node still prints
Confusing null with empty list
4. The following Go code attempts to delete the first node of a singly linked list but causes a runtime error. What is the error and how to fix it?
package main
type Node struct {
value int
next *Node
}
func main() {
var head *Node = nil
// Delete first node
head = head.next
}
medium
A. Compile error: cannot assign head.next to head
B. Runtime panic: nil pointer dereference; fix by checking if head is nil before deletion
C. No error; code works fine
D. Syntax error: missing import; fix by adding fmt package
Solution
Step 1: Identify cause of runtime panic
head is nil, so accessing head.next causes nil pointer dereference panic.
Step 2: Fix by checking if head is nil before deleting
Check if head != nil before assigning head = head.next to avoid panic.
Final Answer:
Runtime panic: nil pointer dereference; fix by checking if head is nil before deletion -> Option B
Quick Check:
Nil check prevents runtime panic [OK]
Hint: Always check head != nil before deleting first node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring nil check causing panic
Assuming head is never nil
Confusing syntax and runtime errors
5. You have a singly linked list with nodes: 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> null. Write a Go function to delete the first node and return the new head. What will be the list after deletion?
func deleteFirstNode(head *Node) *Node {
if head == nil {
return nil
}
head = head.next
return head
}
hard
A. 30 -> 40 -> null
B. 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> null
C. 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> null
D. null
Solution
Step 1: Understand function logic
If head is nil, return nil. Otherwise, move head to head.next and return it.
Step 2: Apply function to list 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> null
Deleting first node (10) moves head to node with value 20, so list becomes 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> null.
Final Answer:
20 -> 30 -> 40 -> null -> Option C
Quick Check:
Function returns list starting from second node [OK]
Hint: Return head.next to delete first node and update list [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Returning original head without deletion
Not handling nil head case
Deleting wrong node by mistake
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.