Check if Number is Prime in DSA Go - Practice Problems & Challenges

Challenge - 5 Problems

❓ Predict Output

intermediate

Output of Prime Check for 29

What is the output of this Go code that checks if 29 is prime?

DSA Go

package main
import "fmt"
func isPrime(n int) bool {
    if n <= 1 {
        return false
    }
    for i := 2; i*i <= n; i++ {
        if n%i == 0 {
            return false
        }
    }
    return true
}
func main() {
    fmt.Println(isPrime(29))
}

A true

B false

C compile error

D runtime error

💡 Hint

Remember prime numbers are only divisible by 1 and themselves.

29 is a prime number because it has no divisors other than 1 and 29.

❓ Predict Output

intermediate

Output of Prime Check for 1

What does this Go code print when checking if 1 is prime?

DSA Go

package main
import "fmt"
func isPrime(n int) bool {
    if n <= 1 {
        return false
    }
    for i := 2; i*i <= n; i++ {
        if n%i == 0 {
            return false
        }
    }
    return true
}
func main() {
    fmt.Println(isPrime(1))
}

A runtime error

B true

C compile error

D false

💡 Hint

Prime numbers are greater than 1.

1 is not prime because prime numbers start from 2.

🔧 Debug

advanced

Find the Bug in Prime Check Code

This Go code is supposed to check if a number is prime but gives wrong output for 4. What is the bug?

DSA Go

package main
import "fmt"
func isPrime(n int) bool {
    if n <= 1 {
        return false
    }
    for i := 2; i < n; i++ {
        if n%i == 0 {
            return false
        }
    }
    return true
}
func main() {
    fmt.Println(isPrime(4))
}

A The loop should run until i*i <= n, not i < n

B The function should return true for n <= 1

C The modulo operator % is used incorrectly

D The function should start loop from i = 1

💡 Hint

Check the loop condition for efficiency and correctness.

Looping until i*i <= n is enough to check divisors and improves efficiency.

🧠 Conceptual

advanced

Why Check Divisors Only up to Square Root?

Why does the prime check loop only run until i*i <= n instead of i < n?

A Because the loop needs to run fewer times to avoid runtime errors

B Because any factor larger than sqrt(n) pairs with a smaller factor already checked

C Because numbers larger than sqrt(n) are always prime

D Because Go language requires loops to have square root conditions

💡 Hint

Think about factor pairs of a number.

If n = a * b and both a and b > sqrt(n), then a*b > n, which is impossible. So one factor must be <= sqrt(n).

❓ Predict Output

expert

Output of Prime Check for Large Number 104729

What is the output of this Go code checking if 104729 is prime?

DSA Go

package main
import "fmt"
func isPrime(n int) bool {
    if n <= 1 {
        return false
    }
    for i := 2; i*i <= n; i++ {
        if n%i == 0 {
            return false
        }
    }
    return true
}
func main() {
    fmt.Println(isPrime(104729))
}

A compile error

B false

C true

D runtime error

💡 Hint

104729 is a known prime number.

104729 is the 10000th prime number, so the function returns true.

Practice

1. What does it mean for a number to be prime?

easy

A. It has more than two divisors.

B. It is divisible by 2 only.

C. It is an even number greater than 2.

D. It has exactly two distinct positive divisors: 1 and itself.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the definition of prime number

   A prime number is a number greater than 1 that has no divisors other than 1 and itself.

2. Step 2: Compare options with definition

   It has exactly two distinct positive divisors: 1 and itself. matches this definition exactly, while others describe incorrect properties.

3. Final Answer:

   It has exactly two distinct positive divisors: 1 and itself. -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Prime number = two divisors only [OK]

Hint: Prime means only divisible by 1 and itself [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking even numbers are always prime
• Confusing prime with odd numbers
• Believing 1 is prime

2. Which of the following Go code snippets correctly checks if a number n is prime?

easy

A. for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { return false } } return true

B. for i := 2; i <= n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { return false } } return true

C. for i := 1; i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { return false } } return true

D. for i := 2; i < n/2; i++ { if n%i == 0 { return true } } return false

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze loop range for prime check

   We check divisors from 2 up to but not including n to find if n is divisible by any number other than 1 and itself.

2. Step 2: Evaluate each option's correctness

   for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { return false } } return true correctly loops from 2 to n-1 and returns false if divisible. for i := 2; i <= n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { return false } } return true incorrectly includes n itself, always returning false. for i := 1; i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { return false } } return true starts from 1, which divides all numbers. for i := 2; i < n/2; i++ { if n%i == 0 { return true } } return false returns true on divisor found, which is wrong logic.

3. Final Answer:

   for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if n%i == 0 { return false } } return true -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Loop 2 to n-1 and check divisibility [OK]

Hint: Loop from 2 to n-1, return false if divisible [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Checking divisibility including n itself
• Starting loop from 1 instead of 2
• Returning true when divisor found

3. What will be the output of this Go function call: isPrime(11)?

func isPrime(n int) bool {
 if n <= 1 {
  return false
 }
 for i := 2; i*i <= n; i++ {
  if n%i == 0 {
   return false
  }
 }
 return true
}

medium

A. true

B. false

C. runtime error

D. infinite loop

Solution

1. Step 1: Check input and loop condition

   Input n=11 is greater than 1, so function proceeds. Loop runs from i=2 while i*i <= 11 (i <= 3).

2. Step 2: Test divisibility inside loop

   Check i=2: 11%2 != 0; i=3: 11%3 != 0. No divisor found, loop ends.

3. Final Answer:

   true -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   11 is prime, function returns true [OK]

Hint: Check divisors up to sqrt(n) for efficiency [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not handling n <= 1 correctly
• Looping beyond sqrt(n)
• Assuming 11 is not prime

4. Identify the bug in this Go function that checks if a number is prime:

func isPrime(n int) bool {
 if n <= 1 {
  return false
 }
 for i := 2; i < n/2; i++ {
  if n%i == 0 {
   return false
  }
 }
 return true
}

medium

A. Loop should run until i <= n, not i < n/2

B. Function should return true if n <= 1

C. Loop should run until i*i <= n for efficiency and correctness

D. The modulo operator % is used incorrectly

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze loop range and condition

   The loop runs from 2 to less than n/2, which is inefficient and may miss divisors for small n.

2. Step 2: Suggest correct loop condition

   Looping until i*i <= n is both correct and efficient because any divisor larger than sqrt(n) pairs with a smaller divisor already checked.

3. Final Answer:

   Loop should run until i*i <= n for efficiency and correctness -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Use i*i <= n to check divisors [OK]

Hint: Check divisors up to sqrt(n) to fix bugs [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Looping only to n/2 misses some divisors
• Returning true for n <= 1
• Misusing modulo operator

5. You want to find all prime numbers up to 20 using Go. Which approach is best to optimize performance?

hard

A. Check divisibility for each number up to n-1 without optimization

B. Check each number from 2 to 20 using a function that tests divisibility up to sqrt(n)

C. Use a loop from 2 to 20 and mark all numbers as prime without checks

D. Only check even numbers for primality since odd numbers are not prime

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand prime checking for multiple numbers

   Checking each number from 2 to 20 individually is necessary to find all primes.

2. Step 2: Optimize divisibility checks

   Testing divisibility only up to sqrt(n) for each number reduces unnecessary checks and improves performance.

3. Final Answer:

   Check each number from 2 to 20 using a function that tests divisibility up to sqrt(n) -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Use sqrt(n) limit for each number check [OK]

Hint: Test divisibility up to sqrt(n) for each number [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Checking all numbers up to n-1 wastes time
• Ignoring odd numbers which can be prime
• Marking all numbers prime without checks