Anagram Check Techniques in DSA Go - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What is an anagram?

An anagram is a word or phrase formed by rearranging the letters of another word or phrase, using all the original letters exactly once.

beginner

How can sorting be used to check if two strings are anagrams?

Sort both strings alphabetically and compare them. If they are identical after sorting, they are anagrams.

intermediate

Explain the frequency counting technique for anagram checking.

Count the frequency of each character in both strings using a map or array. If all counts match, the strings are anagrams.

intermediate

Why is frequency counting more efficient than sorting for anagram checks?

Frequency counting runs in linear time O(n), while sorting takes O(n log n). So frequency counting is faster for large strings.

advanced

What is a limitation of simple anagram checks when dealing with Unicode or case sensitivity?

Simple checks may fail if case or Unicode normalization is not handled. You must convert to a common case and normalize characters first.

Which method can be used to check if two strings are anagrams?

A Compare first characters only

B Check if strings have different lengths only

C Sort both strings and compare

D Check if one string contains the other

Sorting both strings and comparing them is a common way to check for anagrams.

What data structure is commonly used for frequency counting in anagram checks?

A Map or dictionary

B Queue

C Stack

D Linked list

A map or dictionary stores character counts efficiently for frequency comparison.

What is the time complexity of sorting-based anagram check for strings of length n?

A O(n log n)

B O(n^2)

C O(log n)

D O(n)

Sorting takes O(n log n) time, which dominates the anagram check.

Why might frequency counting be preferred over sorting for large strings?

A It is easier to implement

B It runs in linear time O(n)

C It uses less memory

D It works only for numbers

Frequency counting runs in O(n) time, faster than sorting for large inputs.

What should you do before checking anagrams if strings have mixed uppercase and lowercase letters?

A Ignore case differences

B Check length only

C Only check uppercase letters

D Convert both strings to the same case

Converting both strings to the same case ensures case-insensitive comparison.

Describe two common techniques to check if two strings are anagrams.

Think about rearranging letters and counting letters.

Explain why frequency counting can be more efficient than sorting for anagram checks.

Consider the time complexity of each method.

Practice

1. What is the main idea behind checking if two strings are anagrams?

easy

A. Both strings have the same characters with the same frequency

B. Both strings have the same length only

C. Both strings start with the same character

D. Both strings contain vowels only

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand anagram definition

   Anagrams are words or phrases made by rearranging letters of another, so they must have the same characters with the same counts.

2. Step 2: Compare character frequency

   Checking if two strings have the same frequency of each character confirms if they are anagrams.

3. Final Answer:

   Both strings have the same characters with the same frequency -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Character frequency equality = Anagram check [OK]

Hint: Check if sorted strings are equal [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Only comparing string lengths
• Ignoring character counts
• Checking first characters only

2. Which Go code snippet correctly checks if two strings are anagrams by sorting?

easy

A. sort.Strings([]string{s1, s2}); return s1 == s2

B. s1Sorted := sort.Strings(strings.Split(s1, "")); s2Sorted := sort.Strings(strings.Split(s2, "")); return s1Sorted == s2Sorted

C. s1Sorted := strings.Split(s1, ""); sort.Strings(s1Sorted); s2Sorted := strings.Split(s2, ""); sort.Strings(s2Sorted); return strings.Join(s1Sorted, "") == strings.Join(s2Sorted, "")

D. return s1 == s2

Solution

1. Step 1: Split strings into slices of characters

   Use strings.Split(s, "") to get slice of characters for sorting.

2. Step 2: Sort slices and join back to strings

   Sort each slice with sort.Strings and join with strings.Join to compare sorted strings.

3. Final Answer:

   Splitting, sorting slices, then joining for comparison -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Sort slices and join = Correct anagram check [OK]

Hint: Split, sort slices, join, then compare [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Trying to sort strings directly (not allowed)
• Comparing unsorted strings
• Using sort.Strings on whole string instead of slice

3. What is the output of this Go code snippet?

func areAnagrams(s1, s2 string) bool {
    if len(s1) != len(s2) {
        return false
    }
    count := make(map[rune]int)
    for _, ch := range s1 {
        count[ch]++
    }
    for _, ch := range s2 {
        count[ch]--
        if count[ch] < 0 {
            return false
        }
    }
    return true
}

fmt.Println(areAnagrams("listen", "silent"))
fmt.Println(areAnagrams("hello", "bello"))

medium

A. true false

B. false true

C. true true

D. false false

Solution

1. Step 1: Count characters in first string

   Map counts characters in "listen": l=1, i=1, s=1, t=1, e=1, n=1.

2. Step 2: Decrease counts for second string and check negatives

   For "silent", counts decrease to zero without negatives, so true. For "bello", 'b' not in map or count negative, so false.

3. Final Answer:

   true false -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Map count balance = true/false [OK]

Hint: Use map counts to verify character balance [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not checking length first
• Not returning false on negative count
• Confusing rune and byte iteration

4. Identify the bug in this Go function that checks anagrams:

func isAnagram(s1, s2 string) bool {
    if len(s1) != len(s2) {
        return false
    }
    count := make(map[rune]int)
    for i := 0; i < len(s1); i++ {
        count[rune(s1[i])]++
        count[rune(s2[i])]--
    }
    for _, v := range count {
        if v != 0 {
            return false
        }
    }
    return true
}

medium

A. Not checking string lengths before counting

B. Using rune conversion on byte indexing may miscount multibyte characters

C. Missing return statement at the end

D. Using map with int keys instead of rune keys

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand rune vs byte indexing in Go strings

   Indexing strings by byte (s1[i]) may split multibyte characters incorrectly, causing wrong rune counts.

2. Step 2: Identify correct iteration method

   Use range over string to get runes properly instead of byte indexing with rune conversion.

3. Final Answer:

   Using rune conversion on byte indexing may miscount multibyte characters -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Byte indexing ≠ rune iteration for Unicode [OK]

Hint: Use 'for _, r := range s' to handle runes correctly [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Assuming byte indexing works for all characters
• Ignoring Unicode multibyte characters
• Not checking map values properly

5. Given a list of strings, which Go approach efficiently groups all anagrams together?

hard

A. Use string length as map key to group strings

B. Compare every pair of strings with nested loops checking character counts

C. Count vowels in each string and group by vowel count

D. Sort each string's characters and use the sorted string as a map key

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand grouping anagrams by sorted keys

   Sorting characters of each string creates a unique key for all anagrams, allowing grouping in a map efficiently.

2. Step 2: Compare with other methods

   Nested loops are slow (O(n²)), length or vowel count grouping is inaccurate for anagrams.

3. Final Answer:

   Sort each string's characters and use the sorted string as a map key -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Sorted string keys = efficient anagram grouping [OK]

Hint: Sort strings and group by sorted key [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using nested loops causing slow performance
• Grouping by length only misses anagrams
• Grouping by vowels ignores consonants