DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum in DSA C# - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum

O(n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how the time needed to find the maximum path sum in a tree grows as the tree gets bigger.

How does the number of steps change when the tree has more nodes?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

public int MaxPathSum(TreeNode root) {
    int maxSum = int.MinValue;
    int DFS(TreeNode node) {
        if (node == null) return 0;
        int left = Math.Max(0, DFS(node.left));
        int right = Math.Max(0, DFS(node.right));
        maxSum = Math.Max(maxSum, left + right + node.val);
        return Math.Max(left, right) + node.val;
    }
    DFS(root);
    return maxSum;
}
    

This code finds the maximum sum of values along any path in a binary tree using a depth-first search.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: Recursive calls visiting each node once.
• How many times: Each node is visited exactly one time during the DFS traversal.

How Execution Grows With Input

As the number of nodes increases, the number of steps grows roughly the same as the number of nodes.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	About 10 visits
100	About 100 visits
1000	About 1000 visits

Pattern observation: The steps grow linearly with the number of nodes.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n)

This means the time to find the maximum path sum grows directly in proportion to the number of nodes in the tree.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "The recursion visits nodes multiple times, so the time is more than linear."

[OK] Correct: Each node is visited once, and results are combined on the way back, so no repeated work happens.

Interview Connect

Understanding this linear time complexity helps you explain how efficient tree traversals with dynamic programming work in real problems.

Self-Check

"What if we changed the tree to a graph with cycles? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What does the "maximum path sum" in a tree represent in the context of DP on Trees Maximum Path Sum?

easy

A. The sum of all node values in the tree

B. The largest sum of node values on any path between two nodes in the tree

C. The maximum value of a single node in the tree

D. The longest path length in terms of number of edges

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the problem definition

   The maximum path sum means the highest total sum of node values collected along any path connecting two nodes in the tree, not necessarily passing through the root.

2. Step 2: Differentiate from other sums

   It is not the sum of all nodes or just the maximum single node value, but the sum along a path that can include multiple nodes.

3. Final Answer:

   The largest sum of node values on any path between two nodes in the tree -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Maximum path sum = largest node value sum on any path [OK]

Hint: Maximum path sum is about sums along paths, not single nodes [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing maximum path sum with sum of all nodes
• Thinking it is just the maximum node value
• Assuming path must start at root

2. Which of the following C# method signatures is correct for a recursive function that returns the maximum path sum starting from a given tree node?

easy

A. int MaxPathSum(TreeNode node)

B. void MaxPathSum(TreeNode node)

C. int MaxPathSum(int node)

D. TreeNode MaxPathSum(TreeNode node)

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify the return type needed

   The function should return an integer representing the maximum path sum starting from the given node.

2. Step 2: Check parameter type

   The parameter must be a TreeNode object to access node values and children.

3. Final Answer:

   int MaxPathSum(TreeNode node) -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Return type int and parameter TreeNode required [OK]

Hint: Return int for sums, input parameter must be TreeNode [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using void return type when int is needed
• Passing int instead of TreeNode as parameter
• Returning TreeNode instead of int

3. Consider the following C# code snippet for a binary tree node class and a method to find maximum path sum:

public class TreeNode {
    public int val;
    public TreeNode left, right;
    public TreeNode(int x) { val = x; }
}

int maxSum = int.MinValue;

int MaxPathSum(TreeNode node) {
    if (node == null) return 0;
    int left = Math.Max(0, MaxPathSum(node.left));
    int right = Math.Max(0, MaxPathSum(node.right));
    maxSum = Math.Max(maxSum, left + right + node.val);
    return Math.Max(left, right) + node.val;
}

// Tree structure:
//       1
//      / \
//     2   3

TreeNode root = new TreeNode(1);
root.left = new TreeNode(2);
root.right = new TreeNode(3);
MaxPathSum(root);
Console.WriteLine(maxSum);

What is the output printed?

medium

A. 1

B. 5

C. 3

D. 6

Solution

1. Step 1: Calculate max path sums for children

   For node 2 and 3, left and right children are null, so returns 0. Max path sum at node 2 and 3 is their own value (2 and 3).

2. Step 2: Calculate max path sum at root

   At root (1), left = max(0, 2) = 2, right = max(0, 3) = 3. maxSum updated to max(-∞, 2+3+1) = 6. Return max(2,3)+1=4.

3. Final Answer:

   6 -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Sum of path 2->1->3 = 6 [OK]

Hint: Add left + right + node.val for max path at each node [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Ignoring max(0, child) and using negative sums
• Returning sum without updating maxSum
• Confusing return value with maxSum

4. The following C# code attempts to compute the maximum path sum in a binary tree but has a bug:

int maxSum = int.MinValue;

int MaxPathSum(TreeNode node) {
    if (node == null) return 0;
    int left = MaxPathSum(node.left);
    int right = MaxPathSum(node.right);
    maxSum = Math.Max(maxSum, left + right + node.val);
    return Math.Max(left, right) + node.val;
}

What is the bug in this code?

medium

A. It does not ignore negative sums from children

B. It returns the wrong value type

C. It does not update maxSum correctly

D. It does not handle null nodes

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze child sums usage

   The code uses left and right sums directly without ignoring negative values, which can reduce the path sum.

2. Step 2: Identify fix for negative sums

   We must use Math.Max(0, left) and Math.Max(0, right) to ignore negative sums from children.

3. Final Answer:

   It does not ignore negative sums from children -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Negative child sums must be ignored [OK]

Hint: Use Math.Max(0, childSum) to ignore negatives [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not using Math.Max(0, child) causing wrong sums
• Assuming return type is wrong
• Missing null checks (which are present)

5. Given a binary tree where some nodes have negative values, which approach correctly computes the maximum path sum using DP on trees? A) At each node, compute max path sum including both children and update global max; return max path sum including one child plus node value. B) At each node, sum all child node values and return total sum. C) At each node, return the maximum child value only. D) At each node, ignore children and consider only node value.

hard

A. Return the maximum child value only

B. Sum all child node values and return total sum

C. Compute max path sum including both children and update global max; return max path sum including one child plus node value

D. Ignore children and consider only node value

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the correct DP approach

   The correct approach is to consider the maximum path sum including both children and update a global max, returning the max path sum including one child plus node value.

2. Step 2: Identify the incorrect options

   The other options do not correctly handle the problem. They either sum all children, return only the maximum child value, or ignore children and consider only node value.

3. Final Answer:

   Compute max path sum including both children and update global max; return max path sum including one child plus node value -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Correct DP uses both children sums and global max update [OK]

Hint: Include both children sums and update global max [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Ignoring children nodes in calculation
• Summing all children without max checks
• Returning only child values without node