Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA C++programming~10 mins

Three Sum Problem All Unique Triplets in DSA C++ - Interactive Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to sort the input vector before processing.

DSA C++
std::sort(nums.begin(), nums.[1]());
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aend
Brbegin
Cbegin
Drend
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using rbegin() or rend() which are reverse iterators and cause errors.
Forgetting to sort the vector before processing.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to skip duplicate elements for the first pointer i.

DSA C++
if (i > 0 && nums[i] == nums[[1]]) continue;
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Ai + 1
Bi - 1
C0
Di
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Comparing with nums[i+1] which may go out of bounds.
Not checking i > 0 before accessing nums[i-1].
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the while loop condition to move the left pointer correctly.

DSA C++
while (left < right && nums[left] == nums[[1]]) left++;
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aleft + 1
Bright
Cleft - 1
Dright - 1
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Comparing with nums[left + 1] which is not yet moved.
Comparing with nums[right] which is unrelated here.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to correctly move the right pointer and skip duplicates.

DSA C++
while (left < right && nums[right] == nums[[1]]) [2];
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aright + 1
Bright - 1
Cleft++
Dright--
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Incrementing right pointer which goes out of bounds.
Comparing with left pointer values.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to correctly update pointers based on sum comparison.

DSA C++
if (sum < 0) [1];
else if (sum > 0) [2];
else {
    result.push_back({nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]});
    [3];
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aleft++
Bright--
Cleft++; right--
Di++
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Moving wrong pointers for sum comparison.
Not moving both pointers after finding a valid triplet.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main goal of the Three Sum Problem All Unique Triplets in an integer array?
easy
A. Find all unique triplets that sum to zero
B. Find the maximum sum of any three numbers
C. Find the triplet with the smallest product
D. Find pairs that sum to zero

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem statement

    The problem asks to find all unique sets of three numbers in the array whose sum equals zero.
  2. Step 2: Clarify uniqueness and sum condition

    Each triplet must be unique (no duplicates) and the sum of the three numbers must be exactly zero.
  3. Final Answer:

    Find all unique triplets that sum to zero -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Unique triplets with sum zero = Find all unique triplets that sum to zero [OK]
Hint: Look for three numbers adding exactly to zero [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing pairs with triplets
  • Ignoring uniqueness of triplets
  • Looking for max or min sums instead of zero sum
2. Which of the following C++ code snippets correctly sorts the input vector nums before applying the two-pointer technique in the Three Sum problem?
easy
A. std::sort(nums);
B. sort(nums, nums + nums.size());
C. nums.sort();
D. std::sort(nums.begin(), nums.end());

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify correct sorting syntax for std::vector

    For a vector, sorting requires iterators: nums.begin() and nums.end().
  2. Step 2: Check each option

    std::sort(nums.begin(), nums.end()); uses correct syntax. sort(nums, nums + nums.size()); is invalid because nums is a vector, not a pointer array. nums.sort(); is invalid because vector has no sort() method. std::sort(nums); is invalid because std::sort requires two iterators.
  3. Final Answer:

    std::sort(nums.begin(), nums.end()); -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct vector sorting = std::sort(nums.begin(), nums.end()); [OK]
Hint: Use iterators with std::sort for vectors [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using pointer syntax on vectors
  • Calling sort() as a vector method
  • Passing only one argument to std::sort
3. What is the output of the following C++ code snippet that finds all unique triplets summing to zero?
std::vector<int> nums = {-1, 0, 1, 2, -1, -4};
std::vector result;
std::sort(nums.begin(), nums.end());
for (int i = 0; i < nums.size() - 2; i++) {
  if (i > 0 && nums[i] == nums[i-1]) continue;
  int left = i + 1, right = nums.size() - 1;
  while (left < right) {
    int sum = nums[i] + nums[left] + nums[right];
    if (sum == 0) {
      result.push_back({nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]});
      while (left < right && nums[left] == nums[left+1]) left++;
      while (left < right && nums[right] == nums[right-1]) right--;
      left++; right--;
    } else if (sum < 0) {
      left++;
    } else {
      right--;
    }
  }
}
for (auto &triplet : result) {
  for (int num : triplet) std::cout << num << ' ';
  std::cout << '\n';
}
medium
A. No output
B. -1 -1 2 -1 0 1
C. -4 -1 2 -1 0 1
D. -1 0 1 0 1 2

Solution

  1. Step 1: Sort the array and initialize pointers

    Sorted array: [-4, -1, -1, 0, 1, 2]. Loop through each element with two pointers to find triplets summing to zero.
  2. Step 2: Identify unique triplets with sum zero

    Triplets found are [-1, -1, 2] and [-1, 0, 1]. These are printed line by line.
  3. Final Answer:

    -1 -1 2 -1 0 1 -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Unique triplets = [-1, -1, 2] and [-1, 0, 1] [OK]
Hint: Sort first, then use two pointers to find zero sum triplets [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not skipping duplicates
  • Incorrect pointer movement
  • Printing wrong triplets
4. Identify the bug in the following code snippet for the Three Sum problem:
std::vector<int> nums = {-2, 0, 1, 1, 2};
std::vector result;
std::sort(nums.begin(), nums.end());
for (int i = 0; i < nums.size() - 2; i++) {
  int left = i + 1, right = nums.size() - 1;
  while (left < right) {
    int sum = nums[i] + nums[left] + nums[right];
    if (sum == 0) {
      result.push_back({nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]});
      left++;
      right--;
    } else if (sum < 0) {
      left++;
    } else {
      right--;
    }
  }
}
medium
A. Missing check to skip duplicate i values
B. Incorrect sorting of the input vector
C. Wrong initialization of pointers left and right
D. Using push_back instead of emplace_back

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze duplicate handling for i

    The code does not skip duplicate values for i, which can cause duplicate triplets in the result.
  2. Step 2: Confirm other parts are correct

    Sorting is correct, pointers are initialized properly, and push_back is valid here.
  3. Final Answer:

    Missing check to skip duplicate i values -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Skipping duplicates for i avoids repeated triplets [OK]
Hint: Always skip duplicate i to avoid repeated triplets [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not skipping duplicates for i
  • Skipping duplicates only for pointers
  • Assuming sorting fixes duplicates automatically
5. Given the input array nums = {0, 0, 0, 0}, what is the correct output of the Three Sum problem that finds all unique triplets summing to zero?
hard
A. []
B. [[0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0]]
C. [[0, 0, 0]]
D. [[0, 0]]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the input with duplicates

    All elements are zero, so the only triplet summing to zero is [0, 0, 0].
  2. Step 2: Ensure uniqueness of triplets

    Even though multiple zeros exist, only one unique triplet [0, 0, 0] should be returned.
  3. Final Answer:

    [[0, 0, 0]] -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Unique triplet with zeros = [[0, 0, 0]] [OK]
Hint: Multiple zeros produce one unique triplet [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Returning duplicate triplets
  • Returning pairs instead of triplets
  • Returning empty result for all zeros
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard