Sieve of Eratosthenes Find All Primes in DSA C++ - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Sieve of Eratosthenes Find All Primes

O(n log log n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how the time needed to find all prime numbers up to a limit grows as the limit gets bigger.

How does the number of steps change when we check more numbers?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

void sieve(int n) {
    vector<bool> prime(n+1, true);
    prime[0] = prime[1] = false;
    for (int p = 2; p * p <= n; p++) {
        if (prime[p]) {
            for (int i = p * p; i <= n; i += p) {
                prime[i] = false;
            }
        }
    }
}
    

This code marks all prime numbers up to n by crossing out multiples of each prime.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: The inner loop crosses out multiples of each prime number.
• How many times: The outer loop runs roughly up to the square root of n, and the inner loop runs fewer times as p grows.

How Execution Grows With Input

As n grows, the number of operations grows a bit faster than n but much slower than n squared.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	About 20 to 30 steps
100	About 300 to 400 steps
1000	About 5000 to 6000 steps

Pattern observation: The steps grow roughly like n times the logarithm of the logarithm of n, which is slower than n log n but faster than n.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n log log n)

This means the time grows a bit faster than n but much slower than n squared, making it efficient for large n.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "The inner loop runs n times for each number, so the time is O(n²)."

[OK] Correct: The inner loop starts at p squared and skips multiples, so it runs fewer times as p grows, reducing total steps significantly.

Interview Connect

Understanding this algorithm shows you can analyze loops that don't run the same number of times each iteration, a useful skill for many problems.

Self-Check

"What if we started crossing out multiples from 2*p instead of p*p? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What is the main purpose of the Sieve of Eratosthenes algorithm?

easy

A. To calculate the factorial of a number

B. To sort an array of numbers

C. To find the greatest common divisor of two numbers

D. To find all prime numbers up to a given limit

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the algorithm's goal

   The Sieve of Eratosthenes is designed to identify prime numbers efficiently.

2. Step 2: Recognize the output

   It marks multiples of primes as non-prime, leaving primes unmarked up to the limit.

3. Final Answer:

   To find all prime numbers up to a given limit -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Sieve finds primes = D [OK]

Hint: Sieve marks multiples to find primes fast [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing sieve with sorting algorithms
• Thinking it calculates factorial or gcd
• Assuming it finds primes beyond the limit

2. Which of the following C++ code snippets correctly initializes the sieve array for numbers up to n?

easy

A. std::vector<bool> sieve(n+1, true); sieve[0] = sieve[1] = false;

B. std::vector<int> sieve(n, 0); sieve[0] = sieve[1] = 1;

C. bool sieve[n]; for(int i=0; i

D. std::vector<bool> sieve(n+1, false); sieve[0] = sieve[1] = true;

Solution

1. Step 1: Check initialization for prime marking

   The sieve should start with all true except 0 and 1, which are not prime.

2. Step 2: Validate code correctness

   std::vector<bool> sieve(n+1, true); sieve[0] = sieve[1] = false; uses a vector<bool> with size n+1, sets all true, then marks 0 and 1 false correctly.

3. Final Answer:

   std::vector<bool> sieve(n+1, true); sieve[0] = sieve[1] = false; -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Initialize sieve true except 0,1 false = A [OK]

Hint: Start sieve with true, mark 0 and 1 false [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using wrong data type for sieve array
• Not marking 0 and 1 as non-prime
• Initializing all false instead of true

3. What will be the output primes printed by the following C++ code snippet using Sieve of Eratosthenes for n = 10?

int n = 10;
std::vector<bool> sieve(n+1, true);
sieve[0] = sieve[1] = false;
for (int i = 2; i * i <= n; i++) {
  if (sieve[i]) {
    for (int j = i * i; j <= n; j += i) {
      sieve[j] = false;
    }
  }
}
for (int i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
  if (sieve[i]) std::cout << i << " ";
}

medium

A. 2 3 4 5 7

B. 2 3 5 7

C. 1 2 3 5 7

D. 2 3 5 7 9

Solution

1. Step 1: Run sieve marking multiples

   Multiples of 2 (4,6,8,10) and 3 (9) are marked false.

2. Step 2: Identify primes left true

   Numbers 2, 3, 5, 7 remain true and are printed.

3. Final Answer:

   2 3 5 7 -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Primes up to 10 = 2 3 5 7 [OK]

Hint: Mark multiples starting from i*i to avoid repeats [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Including non-primes like 4 or 9
• Printing 1 as prime
• Not starting inner loop from i*i

4. Identify the error in the following Sieve of Eratosthenes code snippet and select the fix:

int n = 20;
std::vector<bool> sieve(n+1, true);
sieve[0] = sieve[1] = false;
for (int i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
  if (sieve[i]) {
    for (int j = i * 2; j <= n; j += i) {
      sieve[j] = false;
    }
  }
}

medium

A. Start inner loop from j = i + 1

B. Initialize sieve with false instead of true

C. Change outer loop condition to i * i <= n

D. Remove sieve[0] and sieve[1] assignments

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze loop conditions

   The outer loop runs up to n, which is inefficient and unnecessary.

2. Step 2: Correct loop to optimize marking

   Changing outer loop to run while i * i <= n avoids redundant checks and improves performance.

3. Final Answer:

   Change outer loop condition to i * i <= n -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Outer loop limit = i*i <= n [OK]

Hint: Outer loop runs till i*i <= n for efficiency [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Running outer loop till n wastes time
• Starting inner loop incorrectly
• Not marking 0 and 1 false

5. You want to find all prime numbers up to n = 50 using the Sieve of Eratosthenes. After running the sieve, how many primes will be found?

hard

A. 15

B. 16

C. 14

D. 17

Solution

1. Step 1: List primes up to 50

   Primes are: 2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47 (total 15).

2. Step 2: Count primes correctly

   Counting carefully confirms total primes up to 50 is 15.

3. Final Answer:

   15 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Count primes ≤ 50 = 15 [OK]

Hint: Count primes carefully or use sieve output count [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Counting non-primes like 1 or 9
• Including primes beyond 50
• Miscounting total primes