What is the main idea behind using a stack to find the largest rectangle in a histogram?
Use a stack to keep track of bars in increasing height order. When a smaller bar appears, calculate areas with bars popped from the stack as the smallest bar, ensuring all rectangles are considered.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why do we push the index of bars onto the stack instead of their heights?
Storing indices allows us to calculate the width of rectangles easily by subtracting indices, which is needed to find the area of rectangles.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What triggers the calculation of rectangle areas when using the stack method?
When the current bar height is less than the height of the bar at the top of the stack, we pop from the stack and calculate the area with the popped bar as the smallest height.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How do you calculate the width of the rectangle when popping a bar from the stack?
Width = current index - index of new top of stack - 1. If stack is empty after popping, width = current index.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What is the time complexity of the largest rectangle in histogram algorithm using a stack?
O(n), because each bar is pushed and popped at most once from the stack.
Click to reveal answer
What data structure is used to solve the largest rectangle in histogram problem efficiently?
AStack
BQueue
CLinked List
DHash Map
✗ Incorrect
A stack is used to keep track of bars in increasing order to calculate areas efficiently.
When do we pop bars from the stack during the algorithm?
AWhen the current bar is taller than the top of the stack
BWhen the stack is empty
CAt the end of the array only
DWhen the current bar is shorter than the top of the stack
✗ Incorrect
We pop bars when the current bar is shorter to calculate areas with the popped bars as the smallest height.
What does the width of the rectangle depend on when popping from the stack?
AThe height of the current bar
BThe difference between current index and new top of stack index minus one
CThe total number of bars
DThe difference between current index and popped index
✗ Incorrect
Width is calculated as current index minus the index of the new top of the stack minus one.
What is the maximum number of times a bar can be pushed or popped from the stack?
AOnce
BTwice
CMultiple times
DNever
✗ Incorrect
Each bar is pushed and popped at most once, ensuring O(n) time complexity.
What is the final step after processing all bars in the histogram?
AReturn the maximum height
BClear the stack without calculation
CPop remaining bars from the stack and calculate areas
DAdd all bar heights
✗ Incorrect
After processing all bars, pop remaining bars to calculate areas for rectangles extending to the end.
Explain step-by-step how the stack helps find the largest rectangle in a histogram.
Think about how the stack keeps track of bars and when areas are calculated.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe how to calculate the width of a rectangle when popping a bar from the stack.
Width depends on indices around the popped bar.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using a stack in the Largest Rectangle in Histogram problem?
easy
A. To keep track of indices of bars with increasing heights
B. To store the heights of all bars in sorted order
C. To reverse the order of histogram bars
D. To count the total number of bars in the histogram
Solution
Step 1: Understand the role of stack in the problem
The stack is used to store indices of bars in increasing order of their heights to efficiently calculate areas.
Step 2: Why increasing order indices?
When a bar with smaller height is found, we pop from the stack to calculate the largest rectangle possible with the popped bar as the smallest height.
Final Answer:
To keep track of indices of bars with increasing heights -> Option A
Quick Check:
Stack stores indices in increasing height order = A [OK]
Hint: Stack stores indices of increasing height bars for area calculation [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking stack stores heights instead of indices
Assuming stack sorts bars by height
Using stack to count bars instead of tracking indices
2. Which of the following C++ code snippets correctly initializes an empty stack to store indices for the histogram bars?
easy
A. stack<int> s = new stack<int>();
B. stack s<int>;
C. stack<int> s;
D. stack<int> s[];
Solution
Step 1: Check correct stack declaration syntax in C++
The correct way to declare an empty stack of integers is stack<int> s;.
Step 2: Identify errors in other options
stack<int> s = new stack<int>(); uses 'new' which is incorrect for stack initialization. stack s<int>; has wrong template syntax. stack<int> s[]; declares an array of stacks, not a single stack.
Final Answer:
stack<int> s; -> Option C
Quick Check:
Correct stack declaration = C [OK]
Hint: Use stack<int> s; to declare empty stack of integers [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using 'new' keyword incorrectly with stack
Wrong template syntax like stack s<int>
Declaring array of stacks instead of single stack
3. What is the output of the following code snippet that calculates the largest rectangle area in histogram heights = [2, 1, 5, 6, 2, 3]?
int largestRectangleArea(vector<int>& heights) {
stack<int> s;
int max_area = 0, i = 0;
while (i < heights.size()) {
if (s.empty() || heights[i] >= heights[s.top()]) {
s.push(i++);
} else {
int tp = s.top(); s.pop();
int area = heights[tp] * (s.empty() ? i : i - s.top() - 1);
max_area = max(max_area, area);
}
}
while (!s.empty()) {
int tp = s.top(); s.pop();
int area = heights[tp] * (s.empty() ? i : i - s.top() - 1);
max_area = max(max_area, area);
}
return max_area;
}
cout << largestRectangleArea({2,1,5,6,2,3});
medium
A. 12
B. 10
C. 8
D. 6
Solution
Step 1: Trace the stack operations and area calculations
For heights [2,1,5,6,2,3], the largest rectangle area is 10 (from bars 5 and 6 with width 2).
Step 2: Confirm final max_area value
After processing all bars and stack cleanup, max_area is 10.
Final Answer:
10 -> Option B
Quick Check:
Largest rectangle area = 10 [OK]
Hint: Largest rectangle area for example histogram is 10 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Miscomputing width when popping from stack
Forgetting to process remaining stack after loop
Mixing up indices and heights in area calculation
4. Identify the bug in the following code snippet for Largest Rectangle in Histogram:
int largestRectangleArea(vector<int>& heights) {
stack<int> s;
int max_area = 0, i = 0;
while (i < heights.size()) {
if (s.empty() || heights[i] >= heights[s.top()]) {
s.push(i++);
} else {
int tp = s.top(); s.pop();
int area = heights[tp] * (s.empty() ? i : i - s.top() - 1);
max_area = max(max_area, area);
}
}
while (!s.empty()) {
int tp = s.top(); s.pop();
int area = heights[tp] * (s.empty() ? i : i - s.top() - 1);
max_area = max(max_area, area);
}
return max_area;
}
medium
A. Width calculation misses subtracting 1 from index difference
B. Missing increment of i in else block
C. Stack is not initialized properly
D. Incorrect comparison operator in if condition
Solution
Step 1: Analyze width calculation formula
The width should be i - s.top() - 1 but code uses i - s.top(), missing the '-1'.
Step 2: Effect of missing '-1'
This causes overestimation of width and incorrect area calculation.
Final Answer:
Width calculation misses subtracting 1 from index difference -> Option A
Quick Check:
Width = i - s.top() - 1 needed [OK]
Hint: Subtract 1 when calculating width between indices [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using i - s.top() instead of i - s.top() - 1
Not incrementing i in else block (but here it is correct)
Wrong comparison operator in if condition
5. Given a histogram with heights = [6, 2, 5, 4, 5, 1, 6], what is the largest rectangle area using the stack approach? Explain how the stack helps in finding this area.
hard
A. 12
B. 8
C. 10
D. 15
Solution
Step 1: Use stack to track indices of increasing heights
Push indices while heights increase: indices 0(6), then 1(2) triggers pop of 0, area=6*1=6. Continue pushing and popping to calculate areas.
Step 2: Calculate max area by popping stack when current height is less
Largest rectangle area found is 15 (from bars at indices 2,3,4 with min height 5 and width 3).
Final Answer:
15 -> Option D
Quick Check:
Largest rectangle area = 15 [OK]
Hint: Stack helps find max area by tracking increasing heights and widths [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not popping stack correctly when height decreases
Incorrect width calculation during area computation
Ignoring last stack cleanup after main loop
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.