What is the main goal when inserting an interval into a sorted list of intervals?
To add the new interval into the list so that the list remains sorted and any overlapping intervals are merged into one.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
How do you know if two intervals overlap?
Two intervals overlap if the start of one interval is less than or equal to the end of the other interval, and vice versa.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why do we merge intervals when inserting a new interval into a sorted list?
Because overlapping intervals represent continuous ranges, merging them keeps the list clean and avoids duplicate or conflicting ranges.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of inserting an interval into a sorted list and merging overlaps?
The time complexity is O(n), where n is the number of intervals, because we may need to check and merge intervals across the list once.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In C++, which data structure is commonly used to store intervals for this problem?
A vector of pairs or a vector of structs/classes representing intervals, where each element has a start and end value.
Click to reveal answer
What should you do if the new interval does not overlap with any existing intervals?
AInsert it in the correct sorted position without merging.
BMerge it with the first interval.
CDiscard the new interval.
DReplace the last interval with the new one.
✗ Incorrect
If there is no overlap, just insert the new interval in the correct sorted position to keep the list sorted.
When merging intervals, how do you determine the merged interval's start and end?
AStart is the minimum start, end is the maximum end of overlapping intervals.
BStart and end are the start and end of the first interval only.
CStart is the maximum start, end is the minimum end.
DStart and end are the new interval's start and end.
✗ Incorrect
The merged interval covers all overlapping intervals, so start is the smallest start and end is the largest end.
What is the first step when inserting a new interval into a sorted list?
ARemove all intervals.
BFind the position where the new interval should be inserted.
CMerge all intervals first.
DSort the list again.
✗ Incorrect
You first find where the new interval fits in the sorted order before merging.
If the new interval overlaps multiple intervals, what happens?
AIntervals remain separate.
BOnly the first overlapping interval is merged.
CThe new interval is discarded.
DAll overlapping intervals are merged into one big interval.
✗ Incorrect
All overlapping intervals including the new one are merged into a single interval.
Which of these is NOT a valid step in the insert interval algorithm?
ATraverse intervals before the new interval without overlap.
BMerge overlapping intervals with the new interval.
CInsert the new interval at the end without checking overlaps.
DAdd intervals after the new interval without overlap.
✗ Incorrect
You must check for overlaps before inserting; blindly adding at the end can break sorting and merging.
Explain the process of inserting a new interval into a sorted list of intervals and how to handle overlaps.
Think about walking through the list and merging as you go.
You got /4 concepts.
Describe how to check if two intervals overlap and how to merge them.
Focus on comparing starts and ends.
You got /3 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main goal when inserting a new interval into a sorted list of non-overlapping intervals?
easy
A. To merge overlapping intervals and keep the list sorted
B. To add the new interval at the end without merging
C. To remove all intervals that come before the new interval
D. To sort the intervals again after insertion without merging
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem context
We have a sorted list of intervals that do not overlap. When inserting a new interval, we must keep the list sorted and merge any overlapping intervals.
Step 2: Identify the correct approach
Simply adding the new interval without merging can cause overlaps. Sorting again without merging breaks the non-overlapping property. Removing intervals before the new one is incorrect.
Final Answer:
To merge overlapping intervals and keep the list sorted -> Option A
Quick Check:
Insert Interval = Merge and keep sorted [OK]
Hint: Always merge overlapping intervals after insertion [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Inserting without merging overlaps
Sorting intervals again without merging
Removing intervals unnecessarily
2. Which of the following C++ code snippets correctly declares a vector of intervals where each interval is a pair of integers?
easy
A. std::vector intervals;
B. std::vector intervals;
C. std::vector intervals;
D. std::vector> intervals;
Solution
Step 1: Understand vector and pair syntax
In C++, a vector of pairs is declared as std::vector>. The pair must specify both types inside angle brackets.
Step 2: Check each option
std::vector> intervals; correctly uses std::pair. std::vector intervals; is invalid syntax for vector. std::vector intervals; misses the second type in pair. std::vector intervals; misses template parameters for pair.
Final Answer:
std::vector> intervals; -> Option D
Quick Check:
Vector of pairs syntax = std::vector> intervals; [OK]
Hint: Use std::vector> for intervals [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Missing template parameters in pair
Incorrect vector declaration syntax
Using incomplete pair types
3. Given the sorted intervals [(1, 3), (6, 9)] and a new interval (2, 5), what will be the resulting list after insertion and merging?
medium
A. [(1, 3), (2, 5), (6, 9)]
B. [(1, 5), (6, 9)]
C. [(2, 5), (6, 9)]
D. [(1, 9)]
Solution
Step 1: Identify overlapping intervals
The new interval (2, 5) overlaps with (1, 3) because 2 <= 3. They should be merged into (1, 5).
Step 2: Merge and keep other intervals
After merging (1, 3) and (2, 5) into (1, 5), the interval (6, 9) remains unchanged.
Hint: Merge intervals if new start ≤ existing end [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not merging overlapping intervals
Inserting without sorting
Merging all intervals incorrectly
4. Consider the following C++ code snippet for inserting an interval into a sorted list of intervals:
std::vector> insertInterval(std::vector>& intervals, std::pair newInterval) {
std::vector> result;
int i = 0;
while (i < intervals.size() && intervals[i].second < newInterval.first) {
result.push_back(intervals[i]);
i++;
}
while (i < intervals.size() && intervals[i].first <= newInterval.second) {
newInterval.first = std::min(newInterval.first, intervals[i].first);
newInterval.second = std::max(newInterval.second, intervals[i].second);
i++;
}
result.push_back(newInterval);
while (i < intervals.size()) {
result.push_back(intervals[i]);
i++;
}
return result;
}
What is the bug in this code if any?
medium
A. No bug; the code correctly inserts and merges intervals
B. The first while loop condition should use <= instead of <
C. The second while loop should check intervals[i].second instead of intervals[i].first
D. The newInterval is not pushed back at the correct position
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the first while loop
The first loop adds all intervals that end before the new interval starts, correctly skipping non-overlapping intervals before newInterval.
Step 2: Analyze the second while loop
The second loop merges all intervals overlapping with newInterval by updating its start and end correctly.
Step 3: Analyze the final steps
After merging, newInterval is added, then remaining intervals are appended. This maintains sorted order and merges properly.
Final Answer:
No bug; the code correctly inserts and merges intervals -> Option A
Quick Check:
Code logic matches insert and merge steps [OK]
Hint: Check loop conditions carefully for overlap and order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Changing loop conditions incorrectly
Pushing newInterval too early or late
Merging intervals incorrectly
5. You have a sorted list of intervals: [(1, 2), (3, 5), (6, 7), (8, 10), (12, 16)]. You want to insert a new interval (4, 8). What is the final list after insertion and merging?